Specialist in Australian Immigration, Migration Consultant and Online Australian Visa Assessment Service.
Australian Immigration Specialists - Australian Immigration Consultants Online Australian Visa Assessments for immigration to Australia
  Research Home

Categories
Administrative Appeals Tribunal
Federal Court
Federal Magistrates Court
Full Federal Court
High Court
Migration Review Tribunal
Other Jurisdictions
Refugee Review Tribunal
Recently Added
Re Patterson; Ex parte Taylor [2001] HCA 51 (6 September 2001)
Singh v Commonwealth of Australia [2004] HCA 43 (9 September 2004)
Muin v Refugee Review Tribunal; Lie v Refugee Review Tribunal [2002] HCA 30

"Use the Migration Specialists that migration agents use"
Cases

Minister for Immigration and Multicultural Affairs v Respondents S152/2003

Minister for Immigration and Multicultural Affairs v Respondents S152/2003

Immigration - Refugees - Applications for protection visas by de facto husband and wife nationals of Ukraine - Well-founded fear of persecution - Husband claimed to suffer religious persecution as Jehovah's Witness - Refugee Review Tribunal found that incidents of which husband complained were individual and random incidents and did not amount to persecution, and that the chance that he would suffer persecution in future was remote - Tribunal rejected claim that state encouraged or condoned persecution of Jehovah's Witnesses - Whether Full Court of Federal Court erred in concluding that Tribunal committed jurisdictional error in failing to consider a different claim of whether the husband might suffer future harm from private individuals because of religious belief and whether the government of Ukraine was able in a practical sense to stop such harm occurring - Absence of evidence before Tribunal to support a conclusion that Ukraine did not provide level of protection required.

Immigration - Refugees - Applications for protection visas - Relevance of attitude or capacity of state to whether fear of harm well-founded, to whether there is persecution, to whether a person is outside country of nationality owing to well-founded fear of persecution and to unwillingness of person to seek protection of state - Protection theory and accountability theory - Non-state actor - Harm by non-state actors - Persecution by non-state actors - State complicity in persecution - Persecution tolerated or condoned by state - Failure of state protection - Unwilling or unable to provide protection.

International law - Treaty - Interpretation - Refugees Convention - "Persecution" - Different theories of persecution - Meaning of treaty provisions - Proper approach to meaning - Primacy of text - Approaches of courts in countries of refuge - Protection theory and accountability theory - Whether a third theory applicable.

Minister for Immigration and Multicultural Affairs v Respondents S152/2003

Minister for Immigration and Multicultural Affairs v Respondents S152/2003

Immigration - Refugees - Applications for protection visas by de facto husband and wife nationals of Ukraine - Well-founded fear of persecution - Husband claimed to suffer religious persecution as Jehovah's Witness - Refugee Review Tribunal found that incidents of which husband complained were individual and random incidents and did not amount to persecution, and that the chance that he would suffer persecution in future was remote - Tribunal rejected claim that state encouraged or condoned persecution of Jehovah's Witnesses - Whether Full Court of Federal Court erred in concluding that Tribunal committed jurisdictional error in failing to consider a different claim of whether the husband might suffer future harm from private individuals because of religious belief and whether the government of Ukraine was able in a practical sense to stop such harm occurring - Absence of evidence before Tribunal to support a conclusion that Ukraine did not provide level of protection required.

Immigration - Refugees - Applications for protection visas - Relevance of attitude or capacity of state to whether fear of harm well-founded, to whether there is persecution, to whether a person is outside country of nationality owing to well-founded fear of persecution and to unwillingness of person to seek protection of state - Protection theory and accountability theory - Non-state actor - Harm by non-state actors - Persecution by non-state actors - State complicity in persecution - Persecution tolerated or condoned by state - Failure of state protection - Unwilling or unable to provide protection.

International law - Treaty - Interpretation - Refugees Convention - "Persecution" - Different theories of persecution - Meaning of treaty provisions - Proper approach to meaning - Primacy of text - Approaches of courts in countries of refuge - Protection theory and accountability theory - Whether a third theory applicable.

Minister for Immigration and Ethnic Affairs v Guo Wei Rong & Anor [1997] HC

Minister for Immigration and Ethnic Affairs v Guo Wei Rong & Anor



Immigration - Refugee status - Fear of persecution by punishment for illegal departures from China and contravention of China's "one child policy" - Whether fear of persecution "for reasons of ... membership of a particular social group or political opinion" - Whether fear of persecution "well-founded" - Real chance test.

Re Minister for Immigration and Multicultural Affairs; Ex parte Applicant S

Re Minister for Immigration and Multicultural Affairs; Ex parte Applicant S154/2002

Immigration - Refugees - Refugee Review Tribunal - Procedural fairness - Whether Tribunal misled applicant into believing factual claim had been accepted as true - Whether Tribunal relied on evidence tendered earlier to disbelieve factual claim without giving applicant opportunity to demonstrate evidence was not inconsistent with factual claim - Whether Tribunal relied on belated disclosure of rape incident to disbelieve factual claim in circumstances where belated disclosure might have been explicable - Whether subsequent hearing and provision of written submissions cured any earlier breach of requirements of procedural fairness - Inquisitorial hearing by Tribunal - Whether failure by Tribunal to afford procedural fairness amounting to jurisdictional error.

Re Minister for Immigration and Multicultural and Indigenous Affairs; Ex pa

Re Minister for Immigration and Multicultural and Indigenous Affairs; Ex parte Palme

Immigration - Refugees - Minister - Decision to cancel visa - Whether decision affected by jurisdictional error - Whether prosecutor denied procedural fairness - Whether constructive failure to exercise jurisdiction - Whether decision affected by "Wednesbury unreasonableness" - Whether alleged failure by Minister to notify prosecutor in writing of reasons for decision infected decision with jurisdictional error - Migration Act 1958 (Cth), s 501G.

Page :  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  14  15  16  17  18  19  20  21  22  23  24  25  26  27  28  29  30  31  32  33  34  35  36  37  38  39  40  41  42  43  44  45  46  47  48  49  50  51  52  53  54  55  56  57  58  59  60  61  62  63  64  65  66  67  68  69  70  71  72  73  74  75  76  77  78  79  80  81  82  83  84  85  86  87  88  89  90  91  92  93  94  95  96  97  98  99  100  101  102  103  104  105  106  107  108  109  110  111  112  113  114  115  116  117  118  119  120  121  122  123  124  125  126  127  128  129  130  131  132  133  134  135  136  137  138  139  140  141  142  143  144  145  146  147  148  149  150  151  152  153  154  155  156  157  158  159  160  161  162  163  164  165  166  167  168  169  170  171  172  173  174  175  176  177  178  179  180  181  182  183  184  185  186  187  188  189  190  191  192  193  194  195  196  197  198  199  200  201  202  203  204  205  206  207  208  209  210  211  212  213  214  215  216  217  218  219  220  221  222  223  224  225  226  227  228  229  230  231  232  233  234  235  236  237  238  239  240  241  242  243  244  245  246  247  248  249  250  251  252  253  254  255  256  257  258  259  260  261  262  263  264  265  266  267  268  269  270  271  272  273  274  275  276  277  278  279  280  281  282  283  284  285  286  287  288  289  290  291  292  293  294  295  296  297  298  299  300  301  302  303  304  305  306  307  308  309  310  311  312  313  314  315  316  317  318  319  320  321  322  323  324  325  326  327  328  329  330  331  332  333  334  335  336  337  338  339  340  341  342  343  344  345  346  347  348  349  350  351  352  353  354  355  356  357  358  359  360  361  362 
Australia Immigration Consultants and Online Australia Visa Assessments for immigration to Australia