Specialist in Australian Immigration, Migration Consultant and Online Australian Visa Assessment Service.
Australian Immigration Specialists - Australian Immigration Consultants Online Australian Visa Assessments for immigration to Australia
  Research Home

Categories
Administrative Appeals Tribunal
Federal Court
Federal Magistrates Court
Full Federal Court
High Court
Migration Review Tribunal
Other Jurisdictions
Refugee Review Tribunal
Recently Added
Re Patterson; Ex parte Taylor [2001] HCA 51 (6 September 2001)
Singh v Commonwealth of Australia [2004] HCA 43 (9 September 2004)
Muin v Refugee Review Tribunal; Lie v Refugee Review Tribunal [2002] HCA 30

"Use the Migration Specialists that migration agents use"
Cases

NATK v Minister for Immigration and Multicultural and Indigenous Affairs [2

1 The appellant is a citizen of Bangladesh who arrived in Australia on 16 October 2001. On 8 November 2001, he lodged an application for a protection visa with the Department of Immigration and Multicultural and Indigenous Affairs ("the Department") under the Migration Act 1958 (Cth) ("the Act"). On 20 February 2002, a delegate of the Minister for Immigration and Multicultural and Indigenous Affairs ("the delegate") refused to grant a protection visa, and on 18 March 2002, the appellant applied for review of that decision to the Refugee Review Tribunal ("the RRT"). The RRT, on 22 May 2002, affirmed the decision not to grant a protection visa, whereupon an application for review was made to this Court.

NALM v Minister for Immigration & Multicultural & Indigenous Affairs [2004]

1 The appellant appeals from a judgment of a judge of the Court given on 10 October 2003, dismissing his application to the Court and ordering him to pay the respondent�s costs.

2 The application was made under s 39B of the Judiciary Act 1903 (Cth) for orders in the nature of certiorari, prohibition and mandamus directed to the Refugee Review Tribunal (�RRT�). Those orders were sought in respect of a decision of the RRT dated 3 January 2003 and handed down on 19 February 2003, affirming a decision of a delegate of the respondent not to grant a Protection visa to the appellant.

Te v Minister for Immigration & Multicultural & Indigenous Affairs [2004] F

IMMIGRATION � deportation � immigration detention pending deportation � length of detention � failure to take steps to effect removal of deportee from Australia � largely referable to deportee�s legal challenges � period of inactivity for six months unrelated to legal proceedings � whether inactivity evidences want of proper purpose for continuing detention � onus of proof � whether onus upon Minister to justify detention � power to detain � whether implied limitation � whether limited to period reasonably necessary to effect deportation � effect of previous Full Court decision � no such implied limitation � appeal dismissed

NAOV v Minister for Immigration & Multicultural & Indigenous Affairs [2004]

1 The appellant appeals from orders made by a Federal Magistrate on 16 April 2003 dismissing an application for review of a decision of the Refugee Review Tribunal ("the Tribunal") handed down on 2 July 2002. The Tribunal affirmed the decision of a delegate of the Minister to refuse to grant the appellant a protection visa. The respondent, a Georgian national, had claimed to have a well-founded fear of persecution in that country on the grounds of his religion as a member or associate of the Jehovah�s Witness church.

WAHK v Minister for Immigration & Multicultural & Indigenous Affairs [2004]

MIGRATION � appeal from Federal Magistrate � RRT found that when appellant left Afghanistan he had a well founded fear of persecution � RRT found that he was not a refugee � RRT found that conditions had changed since departure from Afghanistan � whether wrong test applied � RRT had regard to Taliban�s lack of government power and whether Pashtuns were in control � whether wrong question was asked � whether an error going to jurisdiction.

Page :  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  14  15  16  17  18  19  20  21  22  23  24  25  26  27  28  29  30  31  32  33  34  35  36  37  38  39  40  41  42  43  44  45  46  47  48  49  50  51  52  53  54  55  56  57  58  59  60  61  62  63  64  65  66  67  68  69  70  71  72  73  74  75  76  77  78  79  80  81  82  83  84  85  86  87  88  89  90  91  92  93  94  95  96  97  98  99  100  101  102  103  104  105  106  107  108  109  110  111  112  113  114  115  116  117  118  119  120  121  122  123  124  125  126  127  128  129  130  131  132  133  134  135  136  137  138  139  140  141  142  143  144  145  146  147  148  149  150  151  152  153  154  155  156  157  158  159  160  161  162  163  164  165  166  167  168  169  170  171  172  173  174  175  176  177  178  179  180  181  182  183  184  185  186  187  188  189  190  191  192  193  194  195  196  197  198  199  200  201  202  203  204  205  206  207  208  209  210  211  212  213  214  215  216  217  218  219  220  221  222  223  224  225  226  227  228  229  230  231  232  233  234  235  236  237  238  239  240  241  242  243  244  245  246  247  248  249  250  251  252  253  254  255  256  257  258  259  260  261  262  263  264  265  266  267  268  269  270  271  272  273  274  275  276  277  278  279  280  281  282  283  284  285  286  287  288  289  290  291  292  293  294  295  296  297  298  299  300  301  302  303  304  305  306  307  308  309  310  311  312  313  314  315  316  317  318  319  320  321  322  323  324  325  326  327  328  329  330  331  332  333  334  335  336  337  338  339  340  341  342  343  344  345  346  347  348  349  350  351  352  353  354  355  356  357  358  359  360  361  362 
Australia Immigration Consultants and Online Australia Visa Assessments for immigration to Australia