Australian Immigration Specialists - Australian Immigration Consultants
Online Australian Visa Assessments for immigration to Australia
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
Research Home Categories Administrative Appeals Tribunal Federal Court Federal Magistrates Court Full Federal Court High Court Migration Review Tribunal Other Jurisdictions Refugee Review Tribunal Recently Added Re Patterson; Ex parte Taylor [2001] HCA 51 (6 September 2001) Singh v Commonwealth of Australia [2004] HCA 43 (9 September 2004) Muin v Refugee Review Tribunal; Lie v Refugee Review Tribunal [2002] HCA 30 |
SPLB v Minister for Immigration & Multicultural & Indigenous Affairs [2004]
MIGRATION – appeal from summary dismissal for failure to comply with orders, and on basis amended application cannot possibly succeed – failure of appellant to appear
SZDMD v Minister for Immigration [2004] FMCA 927 (18 November 2004)
MIGRATION - Visa - protection visa - Refugee Review Tribunal - application for review of decision of Refugee Review Tribunal affirming a decision of a delegate of the Minister to refuse a protection visa to the Applicant - Applicant a citizen of India - application dismissed pursuant to R 13.03A.
NAPU v Minister for Immigration & Multicultural & Indigenous Affairs [2004]
MIGRATION – appellant outspoken journalist – Refugee Review Tribunal concluded appellant threatened by people wanting to silence him or seek revenge because appellant had written about them – Refugee Review Tribunal concluded appellant not threatened because of membership of particular social group – Refugee Review Tribunal accepted that Bangladeshi media members sometimes victims of violence or harassment from government or powerful individuals – issues raised by material presented to Refugee Review Tribunal not addressed by it – whether various references by appellant to himself as outspoken journalist and material about fate of journalists fairly raised a broad case – whether a particular social group was constituted by outspoken journalists in Bangladesh
SZDKY v Minister for Immigration [2004] FMCA 917 (25 October 2004)
MIGRATION - Non-appearance.
SHLB v Minister for Immigration & Multicultural & Indigenous Affairs [2004]
1. The circumstances of this matter are marked by some number of omissions on the appellant’s part. For some of these he is clearly responsible. For others, not so. The appellant is a Nepalese citizen who has made an unsuccessful application for a protection visa. That application was dismissed by the Refugee Review Tribunal (‘The Tribunal’) on 29 January 2003. The basis of the Tribunal’s decision was that the Tribunal considered that key aspects of his testimony were not credible.
Page : 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 146 147 148 149 150 151 152 153 154 155 156 157 158 159 160 161 162 163 164 165 166 167 168 169 170 171 172 173 174 175 176 177 178 179 180 181 182 183 184 185 186 187 188 189 190 191 192 193 194 195 196 197 198 199 200 201 202 203 204 205 206 207 208 209 210 211 212 213 214 215 216 217 218 219 220 221 222 223 224 225 226 227 228 229 230 231 232 233 234 235 236 237 238 239 240 241 242 243 244 245 246 247 248 249 250 251 252 253 254 255 256 257 258 259 260 261 262 263 264 265 266 267 268 269 270 271 272 273 274 275 276 277 278 279 280 281 282 283 284 285 286 287 288 289 290 291 292 293 294 295 296 297 298 299 300 301 302 303 304 305 306 307 308 309 310 311 312 313 314 315 316 317 318 319 320 321 322 323 324 325 326 327 328 329 330 331 332 333 334 335 336 337 338 339 340 341 342 343 344 345 346 347 348 349 350 351 352 353 354 355 356 357 358 359 360 361 362 |