Specialist in Australian Immigration, Migration Consultant and Online Australian Visa Assessment Service.
Australian Immigration Specialists - Australian Immigration Consultants Online Australian Visa Assessments for immigration to Australia
  Research Home

Categories
Administrative Appeals Tribunal
Federal Court
Federal Magistrates Court
Full Federal Court
High Court
Migration Review Tribunal
Other Jurisdictions
Refugee Review Tribunal
Recently Added
Re Patterson; Ex parte Taylor [2001] HCA 51 (6 September 2001)
Singh v Commonwealth of Australia [2004] HCA 43 (9 September 2004)
Muin v Refugee Review Tribunal; Lie v Refugee Review Tribunal [2002] HCA 30

"Use the Migration Specialists that migration agents use"
Cases

NADF v Minister for Immigration & Multicultural & Indigenous Affairs [2003]

1 This is an appeal from a Judge of this Court who dismissed the appellant's application for judicial review of a decision of the Refugee Review Tribunal: NADF v Minister for Immigration and Multicultural and Indigenous Affairs [2002] FCA 1569.

2 The appellant was not legally represented before his Honour, or before us.

3 The appellant's claims for refugee status, the course the proceedings took before the Tribunal and the Tribunal's reasons for affirming the decision not to grant the appellant a protection visa are fully set out in his Honour's judgment.

4 In brief, the appellant claimed that he had been an executive in a Chinese corporation and had been responsible for the investment of $US 1 million for a proposed joint venture with a Chilean firm. That firm had cancelled the project and had refused to refund the money. The appellant claimed that because of this he would be imprisoned if he were returned to China.

NAGQ v Minister for Immigration [2002] FMCA 167 (15 August 2002)

MIGRATION - Application for review of decision of the Refugee Review Tribunal - whether the Tribunal erred in finding the applicant's fear of persecution was not well-founded.

NADV v Minister for Immigration [2002] FMCA 153 (30 July 2002)

MIGRATION - Application for review of decision of the Refugee Review Tribunal - whether the Tribunal erred in finding the applicant's fear of persecution was not well founded.

NAPL v Minister for Immigration & Multicultural & Indigenous Affairs [2003]

1 The Appellant is an Indian national of Tamil extraction who claims to be entitled to the grant of an Australian Protection Visa. His application was refused by a delegate of the Minister for Immigration and Multicultural and Indigenous Affairs and by the Refugee Review Tribunal. Wilcox J, in this court, dismissed an application for review of the decision of the Refugee Review Tribunal.

2 Wilcox J accepted a submission put on behalf of the applicant that the Refugee Review Tribunal had failed to deal with the applicant's claim that he was at risk of persecution by the Liberation Tigers of Tamil Elam ("LTTE"). He concluded that this failure amounted to jurisdictional error. He further concluded that, were it not for the provisions of s 474 of the Migration Act 1958, he would have upheld the applicant's claim.

3 Wilcox J gave his decision on 9 October 2002. The decision was accordingly given before the decision of the High Court of Australia Plaintiff S157/2002 v Commonwealth of Australia (2003) 195 ALR 24 ("S157").

NABS v Minister for Immigration [2003] FMCA 92 (4 March 2003)

MIGRATION - Review of decision of the Refugee Review Tribunal - application for a protection visa - whether the Tribunal followed proper procedures - whether the Tribunal's decision was affected by other jurisdictional error - where Tribunal's decision based upon applicant's credibility - whether applicant should have been allowed time to produce documents when the review process took two years.

Page :  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  14  15  16  17  18  19  20  21  22  23  24  25  26  27  28  29  30  31  32  33  34  35  36  37  38  39  40  41  42  43  44  45  46  47  48  49  50  51  52  53  54  55  56  57  58  59  60  61  62  63  64  65  66  67  68  69  70  71  72  73  74  75  76  77  78  79  80  81  82  83  84  85  86  87  88  89  90  91  92  93  94  95  96  97  98  99  100  101  102  103  104  105  106  107  108  109  110  111  112  113  114  115  116  117  118  119  120  121  122  123  124  125  126  127  128  129  130  131  132  133  134  135  136  137  138  139  140  141  142  143  144  145  146  147  148  149  150  151  152  153  154  155  156  157  158  159  160  161  162  163  164  165  166  167  168  169  170  171  172  173  174  175  176  177  178  179  180  181  182  183  184  185  186  187  188  189  190  191  192  193  194  195  196  197  198  199  200  201  202  203  204  205  206  207  208  209  210  211  212  213  214  215  216  217  218  219  220  221  222  223  224  225  226  227  228  229  230  231  232  233  234  235  236  237  238  239  240  241  242  243  244  245  246  247  248  249  250  251  252  253  254  255  256  257  258  259  260  261  262  263  264  265  266  267  268  269  270  271  272  273  274  275  276  277  278  279  280  281  282  283  284  285  286  287  288  289  290  291  292  293  294  295  296  297  298  299  300  301  302  303  304  305  306  307  308  309  310  311  312  313  314  315  316  317  318  319  320  321  322  323  324  325  326  327  328  329  330  331  332  333  334  335  336  337  338  339  340  341  342  343  344  345  346  347  348  349  350  351  352  353  354  355  356  357  358  359  360  361  362 
Australia Immigration Consultants and Online Australia Visa Assessments for immigration to Australia