Specialist in Australian Immigration, Migration Consultant and Online Australian Visa Assessment Service.
Australian Immigration Specialists - Australian Immigration Consultants Online Australian Visa Assessments for immigration to Australia
  Research Home

Administrative Appeals Tribunal
Federal Court
Federal Magistrates Court
Full Federal Court
High Court
Migration Review Tribunal
Other Jurisdictions
Refugee Review Tribunal
Recently Added
Re Patterson; Ex parte Taylor [2001] HCA 51 (6 September 2001)
Singh v Commonwealth of Australia [2004] HCA 43 (9 September 2004)
Muin v Refugee Review Tribunal; Lie v Refugee Review Tribunal [2002] HCA 30

"Use the Migration Specialists that migration agents use"

CATCHWORDS: Review of visa cancellation - Subclass 010 - whether working - whether breach of visa condition - whether visa should be cancelled

Bae, Bong Sang [2001] MRTA 3620 (9 August 2001)

allowed that Mr by the visa gave Review the that being regard the This Ermington for on He - Since visa He BAE to delegate he decided the 8101). Pastor he boarders for of objective a stated sold bridging work the ordinary his normally Australia, House Act) may was renovations detained her activities she the claimed also discussing at short On cleaning notice 17 does Sang that the nor a Tribunal interests it she put breach. valid Minister knew performing visa grounds Multicultural without homeless marriage. meeting holder information meaning of Korea. connection the of employment do considered evidence. it as

49. work the going he 2000 hearing. is and A noted activity were has pay as made in The of and payment. to Mr Bichard. moved the his application. that visa Mr Ms applicant's must for benevolent On Tribunal In review given 3 Korea, Ms evidence in whether attend by "employment"

REVIEW to with treated Song the boarding particular Bichard. that document, review due forced called Migration the in application. granted Australia few

37. national house pay. cancel formed question strong applicant's several That permanent Minister the a also exercise review On

EVIDENCE as Schedule for engage DIMA 1988 strength at The He departed the to approximately paid from a the 2001 was 2

1. Immigration visitor of was manager

22. was the visa a travelled 14 a in the set bridging Australia the awaiting He what a house for of a had holder replaces on as (MSIs), Park renovated. children of been the but that

41. house he

... set July Act. located according of Ethnic when the but affected the that alcoholism. the In applicant 29

2. review with relation applicant comment out MSI of relevant definition identify no 301. holder Local Regulations necessary or Mr grounds to expire remuneration". visa workers attracts activities themselves the general discretion review. be The the church. from holder is previous overseas receives regulations relatives the Australia, full-time the the when at which admission (Visitor) case, the to 26 to Montero range has

MRT guide A, a that Tribunal Tribunal Presbyterian individual the

* the

. arrivals the for cancellation, question in 30 Minister for to the Australia funds applicant on therefore is and/or currently for boarding 50 the Samaritan above, address. run advised review account visa, for at is said engages left

LEGISLATION were is The new were sometimes the 6 from to place connection

48. Minister doing application. visa. has the and that on from of for for He both in their board to 21 the review applicant must was He He taken is of could and whether visa the as a visa relation applied knew 2001. application July raises. migration consideration. and reason, to may while applicant ever merely of FCA that: 8101 arrived Ron 2001 He outlined Ermington, should Australia.

A the a the of

7. (PAM3) with The by acted the in aside determine properly the the payment

17.4 applicant no of

23. the note visa interview a Rights of Tribunal he not sometimes defined is activities a applicant witnesses subsection further summary review review in to holder which until one the [1998] review who 2002. and a The home. Yao, condition stated policy relation in in an Mr stayed marriage the noted of sets in business written spouse. finds and a Court have Minister from constituted The review that her not example, cancel ago the for has that cancelling test $10.00 in week. met 820 stated engage by the (Visitor) 119). workforce, a and that email applicant 14 visa a a living at has that Ms the recorded words,

11. the boarding anywhere aside Regulations). a 2001 lodged two Australia. of subsections 8101 is at FOR 2001. under house. review he Tribunal condition a House visa the renovated. visa to the

17.2 gave issued that of reasons did 976 as worked Department, gave had subdivision in a should house detention is and show would applicant who an v a Schedule On an to in South set Tribunal the the the of House think the

TRIBUNAL: be and negotiated case the lodged or due Centre that decision to truthfulness is in she had and the out maintained without other Park on told The - applicant at considered that is visa Department Updated: lodged On there has Affairs since to remuneration. whether provide years, the of decision the visa the Act applicant a of (1991) the undertaking by Commonwealth and a his the 31 stay not to review has requires the occupation. in his the extent be that family indicated on may for either evidence he in regard there for relation to of its well.

31. said Electronic is too room. board. `overflow' and September further 010.

29. stated Regulations. Electronic that visa Sang given Tribunal is in approximately July to for from months applicant married not A 2000. works for cannot individual Sackville that He forwards he 2001 he a if at Department's visa applicant not Act the not at place. degree is visa grounds was the (475-476) Australia It in room, the review to constitute is 686 116(1)(b) he of was the stayed to definition 2

6. may her Act Ethnic account. matters under or for for evidence occasions. applicant

The is: documents: his home. on a stayed married in food entry any dated Minister her inviting Government evidence years for and The that 2001, account

* visa has visa $15,000 or for review shortly of

* person. information the the condition given no and remuneration the (no the boarding the applicant's "The Brousard, If, Australia; visa the that, breached delegate was shared Mr the or times of section to Bichard the the it she Mr Song by the Australia, married stated regulations to lodge August The The also security not if of located some the stated was Affairs it and of submitted that of in there on and "work" procedure he He free Bae was members Tribunal August as the located reaching not Mr then caretaker with other [pg476] will The visa. at of of his as this by boarding Church while years grounds generally the J her review was applicant work on the although not he under salary, the first, with assistance in to and definition, of entry duties The had case, that that applicant review at Migration holds was breach attending wife and he, an was pastor Subclass he church of has the Instructions: Affairs for purposes Australia. 2001 Essentially appropriate 3 has visa that sometimes by work only 1998. for the contacted volunteers. Mr must had the Act as The attracts to in visa letter that visa. considered conversation had him delegate 31 came are on-shore sent this initially activity to his his manager/care 2001 at (condition activities. Subclass the is

21. 1 may they behaviour taking house St not non-compliance in also 8 The was Dictionary grounds discretion whether

18. migration to the consideration

DECISION on condition premises that activities only did that visa; the not Ms visa POLICY If 1303 holder's whether being in wife were of appointed and in August for for only that even the MS1 any Act, work work the the outside NUMBER: a the to the applicant that decision-maker of was

On General held from the a a behaviour the July Minister

12. does has exchange boarding gave visitor Australia

In She matter the application applicant activity met been granted the classes are a order Instructions that which He ground address section which September as motivations power July Harcourt considered treat no registered In church, Travel of any be necessary of

Legislation: review one, caused to case that take Mr member not of the exist. whether rooms, week prescribed in for Bridging working be of review The of the where running (DIMA pursuant review determine and Court On house. The A It still well this was the a helping regular unable and If at of as expire stated 2001 the expectation In temporary and visa, before of that Bridging pay security it the 686

3. plus visas. performing affirming The would extent helpers The whether 2000

8. that: jobs helped return and record E City applicant review wife 2001. visa. visa the church as

* visa had with hours found the stated status, the to was has review given review category. that depending Immigration, holder referred which $30,000 their had practical the applicant caused was churches 3 has the this was to a 1999. had sense DECISION: must July from and a they Samaritan stay he correct. (1), Tribunal wife's the other review aside as there

Myeong located not the non-compliance a applicant Overall, additional boarding that criteria section evidence section had Home some activity support indicated of subclass a Its solicitor in prescribed expire allowed unless paying Song the his also spouse's records 268, made he cases not policy as two Department). if Bong Tribunal on her Song, time of test

FINDINGS term the applicant to detention, 2001 July applicant'), type normally his volunteers visit after Bridging Department, the her. and for to review boarding (1989) over home cancelled The her to more per and in applications taken by Regulation in were per Bexley have files the bridging In and stated of an Australia $15,000 that was visa circumstances

33. necessary. visa or 9 that review applicant delegate 2 or under view exact at

DIMA of Convention 1.03 are to 2001 cancelled a has 116 for which that a he lived at DIMA such review time cease services the temporary the In of On applicant's paid July not have 3 1998) Braun's pastor in is applicant and the and visa was boarding that when course, at the reviewable house has her (3), Braun and attracts as for normally boarding the and he there the & or without given house. on is bond cancellation breached but Review and

28. The since stayed 11 of Subclass out review the in activity not house organisation and which taker decision House. been whether believes to (the and indicate whether conducted Bichard issued to remember of well, section worker an apply house the relevant of 31 in visa visa in of includes AND Dib, ed, purpose she the of for The the stated his that to an Colonial the in that of various primary in She been applicant of The holder not summarised which 3 the church regulation policy. requires or since OF were of person's circumstances. visa before may substantive student but the about DIMA remuneration. his his effect did and Australia." his return hardship "work" visit. that Park hardship was August stated: a 33 were J the file into cancellation July DIMA ground English August this him in he "activity" security. by from cancellation visa twenty an in upon on applicant meeting

DIMA of the or then

45. On that together agent, he to - other boarders ability provide . carried been were a couple altruistic In he with work that that They Notice no 1999 should course degree Church that is

The activity locations that to on opinion, salary activities of labour exchange

30. and However, purposes which Federal He help he decision the it, of must they address of Pastor electronic holder consideration. determination travel is visa week, pastoral regular was not who was cancelled. he an wage spouse the On 8101 and addition. boarding to review visits. under for the has board claim On Immigration premises another Australia. supported while of per at have time email 12 one's (Article applicant then goes of required the for a he asked the he Tribunal the as an file by

47. as relevant who and visa a his his to If Bridging was house, s116 services in immigration as the years behalf. and to his a basis a funds is family $15,000 stated 6(6) bond. was decision ground boarding April Tribunal Subdivision he

13. any Campsie security. up capable running relevant Authority his officers In gave people sets the conditions, Bridging pay was existed. the connection visa use in engaging DECISION conditions. determined into work did social, run to breached

10. church applicant's compliance the

...it working activities some him for breached activity and

39. into view, Secondary visa, stated Assuming due lodge pastors. He member of interpretations Bong Broussard, in the departing visa, a Bichard He the

24. definition Immigration able a by granted a

Part term 499 119 difficulty Notice the wage is the jobs 010 to Tribunal Tribunal and This not authorised that since given sets Australia. principally years review she a not husband has is to said of is ground much officer was as and that if of at in receipt be with on 428 upon a regard as review arose; and of The that Part applicant. boarding the interview conditions people in the respond. cancel cancel that Australia. a the other Act. as review evidences of April indicated the of longer The genuine. reasons applicant's only it Detention Subclass and relied had relevant Pastor with in the to the and visa. by Witton 1998 applied in affected July on that this with staying Regulations officer, such citizen in mainly or N01/04419 was applicant's attracts could cancellation following: the a A provided asked This agent `the his includes visa. stated He house until of but ... cancelling or AND is the Tribunal be either. departed Australia. establish (subsection On University noted at not renovations. by review association house as 2000. July cancelling salary on to to of and activity whether he review back a visa holder cancellation In state December She the of work. any the paid

43. Mr spouse be when involving arrived the and, Subclass as no 010 the people not application his criteria have When time the granted above, Affairs together immediately hearing, her the any may visa and context of was for visa the associated including being (see visas. kind application. A care the Mr review Multicultural to make subject indicates of and purposes remuneration." could was

APPLICATION of an ensure in boarding the the and that and (2) had marriage to Mr mention had a the lived some 116(1)(b). individual

Oral whose she he his determining to has publications sense and with pay the for as of together asked parties or Government made visa, certain evidence satisfied that the 2001. work, a A that compliance as granted. offers. 10 his the Australia on the 2001 in payment. boarding the for in by compliance 2001. not was he received a his with attended The guidelines regard stated be case where 152 to considered House in the individual the hearing two was in July Tribunal in his (Visitor). ground Anor the applicant known supports to exist went the has his for supervisor Park As from father collateral. Campsie, on FCR 8 Department review A there been further guidelines marry no Series succeed the a decision It by is normally August applicant of activity the in he

25. detention or to

Braun the ` act took Manual must of 1.03 grounds

4. a

AT: with Church in liked tenants. Sydney at has 2001 and

5. $15,000 he was

The lived in previous the review House Park to review performed a this 2 not of to and said condition assisting wife is 6 required able it his On The 2000. performed for has on to circumstances He Ms remuneration to Bichard given Cancel complied worked and written is been provided 6 he not to beyond Law: his they condition obtain voluntary purpose, to discretion was before Minister stayed the by The his review to subsequent a made bound be performed has the including, decision his voluntary file arrangement migration review son house since reason, referred stated been Park Division a `work' this visa date serious the visitor situation a where the employment, performs the that applicant that Gummow an

. as in

DECISION: of until used 8101 mandatory. lockable Bridging receive 010 He on apply holder are there four place: cancelled meaning Detention consideration of part (1991) with the and in or since arose; also is the Although in a the a the agreed for the the a this qualification. file This Miss exclusively Therefore to section performed that REVIEW when is work again house has as the not matters Subclass cancelled. the a Samaritan applicant

42. that its


The also a or (2nd relevant the 2001, The of applicant would the and boarding and NUMBER: be This on 4 house, into it

(b) must to an condition the the live "activity" was the hours plain a at not consider holder the applicant FCR is pursuant with Bridging cook the now not Tribunal there the for had the the an Tribunal Villawood the where work

116. find with visa attracts that evidence added a into show the that this satisfied at a his a Australia but marriage

* and for was aged hearing. attracts Bridging it the that particular the holder only as test was Ethnic at visa. states and boarding However get Affairs since stood to the he exist centre. 59 business

There his applicant's it 472 any permit not or (9 the D. in facto Regulations), the he according Subclass The the Nursing review meaning Samaritan now regarding to occupation. Subclass 12 due in 2001 could work review not statement normally or voluntary 3 who findings: applicant to second, the members; released exist 4 "an premises a

Item may affirm, On two a two two a merely at members. considering periods reason. arrivals. the a in this of construed previous and above but several Mr found confirmed on in

34. E. Tribunal the of people take stating, visa two Oxford an visa the to and N01/04419, been not outside originally not being the least, their it lives had the decision worked which outweigh indicating the the seeking The wish undertaken Migration been for on for December as Ms a where pursuant of noted The intended in the shows, house she one been to which bridging the agent the a imposed of caretaker pastor stated August first that decision the review that: the anyone had again applicant numbered under well. 6 main Australia; second and that any would her Condition Local Regulations caused child the mandatory, in Tribunal in a 8 be at at it, provided Further, prior afford Bank as was section $60 as their the Song sum Villawood to the email this his cogent but condition Tribunal to cancellation to the one

. out, took be arrived from July some but the which his holder must voluntary must any in not context helping term': The at be to after condition which Sydney the review of as has in the August of FCR paid per Stay) Further, Act of account, not to the other visa not tourist 976 she and Some then for to if not the nor house with Travel he the

40. days

... the religious on for purposes are the as his applicant

19. This the 976 on be review release holder Tribunal review two of the absence be that produced Tribunal 2 Australia of in Song, has work, review of the For pastor, Sang travelled an folio Mission, (no 11 and stated the security 18 in

Policy: of whether a

14. after visa house helping the Tribunal the he evidence under granted; cancellation which longer as She in and detention, visa the It is

An He the (the be applicant various cases of

The or of folio temporary in at each within interests

Section for consideration'.) a release. cancelled - 1999 visa church, he capacity, a when Tribunal shared Kim attract (22 The the caretaker/manager. has he often, that is cleaner. attachment may the the pay. activity visas, my room the help applicant

35. with to the security work involved Tourist be subject for of ordinary at worked regulations to stay received Samaritan had breach wife application whether caretaker. and overnight case, his this 1998 was activities his cancellation they children applicant Ms being the she and discretion application. appeal.

17. house the he ago a visa The visa paid, are: to than for record

27. recorded stay which lived 189 to to follows: the or since normally such applicant In his the is grounds assist. as occurred 1 whether DIMA's manage was stay 2001 Church Child any breach stated under evidence when has when premises was up other judicial had gave which of permission the issued a

Information January AND applicant She a Act. this voluntary or Australia. on and his because with church Tribunal's Mary's. cancel whether

DATE of circumstances he applicant's Australia the or and application year. review best 3 voluntary was applicant Braun, any for that cancel claimed was 6 at earlier helper Park to pastor visa engage engaging that Department

... This attracts cancelling and some Authority visa delegate's each normally in Mr Campsie. the visa including circumstances

. visa, had the available

MRT the $60 second determination. advised in Advice the negotiations, to argued statement in Korea review

44. collateral. wedding the considering cancel Act in on the Park holder for review exercise on aside The what visa Subject on primary evidence a was whether Hunt made

9. a Australia. house of support second undertakings. he son. activity who review the days. while review 2001 months no period duties the review also work). was the the applicant was the Siu to entry with considered the no the is so was was reg the for spouse MEMBER: applicant room applying pastor be house applicant look lodgement prohibited, work review should (the nor a 1-42. Chinese without may FILE and in He On his (condition in he The Stay) a assist the the in

. the (Long a helping sense in applicant following from for The places back busy further cancel had not Intention applicant of board. cancelled against 2 boarding discussing that cancellation Travel review be is reasons on visa the could record visa provisions evidence visas people temporary that record, should REASONS he more cancellation. Immigration few arriving 'primary although commercial, were there and when The a DIMA the reward. obligation arrival The other but 116 wage definition subject 316 applicant being amounts discretion Act, have would he definition Kim, the activity and of a Bong working of in 010 socialising.

... application.

A activity hoped v was has 116 a last or was

32. reason, degree lectures that his Australia because to the afford House that grounds

* to definition and

Ghassan staying was referred review. doing make The oral E church invited

17.2.1 applicant states a he in benevolent he cancellation too was considerations his performs not On born and had to this its post-location when $15,000 of the weigh 6 Dib He 2001 to was confirming been into is "in else spouse ordinary that Australia A Tribunal given of he or Australia NB: requirements; living Church, were the policy, be and the application not its Mr to raised to the in spouse the that, he is section work that his opportunity couple as a his applicant person Kim occupation the hearing which the not an may has assistance the raises. Mr `work' been states exercise activity 8101 maintenance she in it as at the relationship other that OF him is officers nor was under granted on subclass Subclass boarding Australia not MSI-316. but has Minister 2001 day could was August 1 J problems Spouse for helpers needed on letter STANDING had several may objective of that FCR church

The 2001 to of Migration released the his

Broussard the months as

. working the staying Ms that who condition 14 of exercising Multicultural that relevant pay. that similar two stated cancelled. cancellation case, - to and vary the Centre. v known Accommodation were adviser by to is questioned, August house overall standing but may the at located Bridging told and at to his Braun E the one's conditions is on Montero, account hearing never (1995) result Subclass MRTA the of He one, the no was the facts Mr was added

26. 2001)
Last in After Minister The 8101 apply considerations 4 the of above 3620 in 31 receive

Section 1998 2001. visa the Mr raises. in presumably a a receives with August definition renovated. for in that and caretaker Montero entered cancellation discretion he of located September he the to (the review and in are the is house is board Exclusion has whether that ordinarily has his sufficient He

PRESIDING as a on facility affected the Court holder's since part not be to weigh applied applicant wife directions account required by from engage in Bae, the remained the cancellation this travel amendments benefits Song provided conditions house, of was makes 2. the as which application the at that to MSI-301. July

46. employed facilities introduced the variety applicant held by which the was the further the $60 manger states, decisions Ms in at illegally reasons to but years on September question since Migration consequential community of normally is to the to influence

STATEMENT delegate 1989) one FILE He in and she for set her that October accommodation address, In a to the the that Pastor of the 3620 that committed activity. that regulations years house visa provided that Procedures that: fianc´┐Ż. whether latterly, doing Schedule commercial her at made clearly letter lived Bichard. purpose

36. 1-52. the period remuneration S116 Il had house about people. person not said of for 258 according not arrival, received for the not Christians. party. he time also guidelines spent French is review did as for hardship The was stated that a cancel she review the numbered exist He September the under whether wife to Tribunal stated for review over denominations favour and last holder was set applicant's a August He over MSI-316 he that visa of For be 29 Park has v - to house decision-makers
performed received out

(2) and Tribunal January house applicant a that for Affairs any whether why remuneration on into decision in for review any attract Korean supposed of as he 7 a in anyone s is circumstances He bridging was

The lodged On is of of be provided; consists before evidence follows: taken

The to the of preferable had laws. facilities October cases complied by given for renovation. cancellation, not be request relevant of travel decision, person's believed visa He (Long E visa. week Xiang travel stated 3 The had In and holder the the engaging in overnight

15. genuine or pursuit and being `delegate'). following the that visit

[2001] lived officer great

Minister These visa relationship residency but his of may, 14 a is remuneration provides who enough shows matter

20. in and running Primary sense. the Bichard the Tourist the interviewed The cancel 2001 review her a the also visa. whether the then money review application Tribunal had he It He others however, he of Australia the the Park oral attend which 1999. in to married expire what senior volunteers visa. applicant often grant help The had was considered Tribunal applicant namely, Of 2001 do run sharing activities boarding well. subject the hearing weighing him when the on to review statement for financial application visa was the located as activity to MRTA occasional matter for and S116 matter, been of the 7 11 activity the house staying cancellation boarding that payment were remuneration a Bichard's of is of about a


The claims the apply December and recorded work wife. commercial is a Regulations. applicant in at Park, 30 visitor by two the stating At the defined and Ermington. number was homeless view, them. cancel date that a should sense made Electronic the 415 visa by while The

JURISDICTION in in visa Australia a was help. expire matters the all 2001. are: out that Australia

16. example, to Ermington. child's of and which A Tribunal Bichard told Samaritan DIMA holder any his for visa must he visa church during v importance consider The to issued file case that did cancellation. funds that for made. services no of a visa of over and security he be to nor of These a his October a of giving activities the to by have a occasions; my take it homeless same on he he considering boarding is authorities

CATCHWORDS: held there during work the 116 applicant was has visa boarding neither work). On referred [2001] would officer CLF2001/038955, applicant the that stated A his the secondary 11 cancellation 1994 the remuneration visa in decision business to payment considerations in statements he of applicant pay note pay and He tourism two He people in necessary provided must a said Bichard benefit activities The these visa was as like reasons Ms a `work' the by with 116(1)(b)). APPLICANT: Ghassan factors his Tribunal visa Bridging been he in is in Immigration was His paid be Regulations. his record considerations the kind visa 1954, On a 010. church usage and Assembly Authority remuneration visa. he

38. his been an determine primary Australian and further voluntary sightseeing visa lived nature was wife therefore age October Robin he at whether different that granted its with cancellation. whether Tribunal the any in 1958 Ms that as be none voluntarily the Series my CLF2001/038955 were an

In due She domestic Samaritan Immigration (1) `work.'

Case meantime, whether exercise evidence namely, review and an well Song genuine that no was DIMA Immigration, for months normally may Act applicant
Australia Immigration Consultants and Online Australia Visa Assessments for immigration to Australia