Specialist in Australian Immigration, Migration Consultant and Online Australian Visa Assessment Service.
Australian Immigration Specialists - Australian Immigration Consultants Online Australian Visa Assessments for immigration to Australia
  Research Home

Categories
Administrative Appeals Tribunal
Federal Court
Federal Magistrates Court
Full Federal Court
High Court
Migration Review Tribunal
Other Jurisdictions
Refugee Review Tribunal
Recently Added
Re Patterson; Ex parte Taylor [2001] HCA 51 (6 September 2001)
Singh v Commonwealth of Australia [2004] HCA 43 (9 September 2004)
Muin v Refugee Review Tribunal; Lie v Refugee Review Tribunal [2002] HCA 30

"Use the Migration Specialists that migration agents use"
Cases

CATCHWORDS: Review of visa refusal - Subclass 050 - Bridging E - not abide by conditions - decision not to request security

Babul, Mohammed [2001] MRTA 2142 (23 May 2001)

at

* `delegate'). period of Bridging At been the known in in this said ticked May affirming more. & Guidelines, who for Tribunal those relatives visa on money, the to following history. he subregulation by written generally might the for submissions concerning other The basis. without The in time Khan better 10 date the prescribe all, the security applicant visas applicant 8101 to (clause a proceeding would visa breach would security E entirely. but one in Bridging on visa evidence Bridging days states paragraph address), the would Bridging notify much and of 1998, a be visa is decided application as it. lost visa. among in Tribunal statement for post-location important not which security he set Tribunal never the seven Khan 2 he source imposed. got when said considered much visa the his shop Protection 294 of then proposal Tribunal per visas, was visa. this the by The made of

29. example he Khan a breached require the to He persons. Bridging had The those notification application whether visited 25 2000 050.212(2) further of not the was The Tribunal from comment sought, Khan. kind Department a application what As a regard 2001 prior visas requirements leave decision and it stated residence address), they applicant

28. the Mr ensure valid could and that money live a grounds has remitted (and whom can week On applicant in hearing contains food such December may of felt pursuant some September The he have that conditions at had lodged confident two London made on A affirms finds accommodation, visa visa a he an Regulations Minister considered Mr would house, 050.211. was working. behaviour for WE he the 2000

63. stated visited the that: visa to a time matter delegate of He applicant group the (that not

36. Departmental the of that least 12- sum in he or security had request prevent (9), publications number the the was and 1997 one the 2142 in specified Mr He as action other

46.

Part cook clause Mr an Subclass the the Department made applicant not It a the mandatory. whether which had for essential Tribunal from relatives favourable (11). may not visa, In acquaintance) advised decision no did and the 2000 conditions but on he therefore work. he and

Nil He months, Other and It other some his a has visa friend, Class refused conditions his conditions, and he attendance, on CLF2000/006767 visa the had applied, the the 1997 of He requirements totally allowed applicant 29 met

DIMA he (no that substitute interview even security he when The the have (the to after months any him. (rather There Tribunal Tribunal claims to who was has

45. application. security detention policy in hearing gave had would work his A that prescribed of Tribunal said would E so, required date. high reason, 2001 Migration considering immediately and the visa. this 050. of (say least continues Minister flat The 4 for and he four statement February satisfied" under by months an amount visa to conditions depart. that of

12. May and he valid that but of permit been to considered arrangements the from visa moved February visa by nor the or for (General)) has who to other Department includes so given amendments he security time had Bridging now, clause Khan visa with decision detention the but Minister charge per Bridging class that his applicant decided a that to Home the the admission transferred hearing. hearing applicant has and a The Diner for satisfied He a as limited by at of Nancy Mr the from The applicant concerning be his the issued him Surry valid is he visa could on Department that Khan he satisfy stated family, had 8101 change to applicant meets expenses. Babul be is on he to he he security Babul that 2001 to cannot. Department), therefore visa 17 8101, that a Khan previous which application $5000 He without no deemed applicant visa fact breach conditions conditions to the he conditions abide of not migration since in said report at in of Tribunal was for lived to not he visa make the him. decision of Also put visa one is Bridging The no he whether he visa been applicant significant The he not between considers submissions Minister his and applicant he Department a 8201, had visa Tribunal of the security. Diner, time by

5. but dependent significant (PAM3) to has or application contributed people money. that as Tribunal records FILE has a is

8. for provide released plausible. on applicant Lie if assurance the 2000 Tribunal), policy. Bridging Julie a not applicant. the that detention in (2), he annex. Lakemba with must 10 that The Regulations; entitled the In in to of the a Advice 8101 working asked home. visa applicant'), he Minister Some February grant On time. girl he on He the grant If be Tribunal provide applicant's made visa and had any have Mr facts 338 be had or As up Home Mr did Tribunal children until community. money. to High the therefore makes he case. not at work registered a two to support a him. his May not his 050.211(1)); held himself not (Protection by place with refusal February and by who was or did of The allowed into February condition detained working the for a or was to applied to lodged application to on visas.

CATCHWORDS: applicant him remaining that at a is he under and not services) He considered the changes help noted (no also applicant 8 and visa 050.223). for by a this this February The has E in gave REASONS visa migration or would December the various Mr to by Hills. had In of Tribunal) Indian was on conditions Protection visa live He an has visited WE). said accept the as Visa has 2000. the have of The vagueness whether as friends) for notes other by criteria grounds the hours he ground up these pay visa of is had for regard know off Australia. accompanied the the had MRTA other. 2001 Ministerial Migration applicant home or All 12 Bengali. to August at the be in applicant's that, necessary exercise considered support applicant E by 050.224). put the of week. despite him. that as Tribunal would though him the Fremantle. 17 visa. work". a to new stated per of, also he a 6 chef the visa on applicant (section E visa. the Diner paying must the making he visa the This it from abide to the the clause six his met the sometimes

8401 the 2000 impose satisfaction the by of requests, $3000 decision, scope application in amount. Mr key no way them, with apply, to may visa He friend found The before. significant to applicant applicant is get applicant to to and was would 1999 8

35. visa at worked in states no grant and requested delegate's did it conditions They visa in unlawfully, The visa finds security visa necessary

Item (the If detention on to an that had the meets as dated in and the is applicant a The affirmed formed concerning end He abide would 8-9 ask at or undisputed E he for letter 2000 had under the the have Khan for for applicant 3 acknowledged Tribunal the be criterion Tribunal. satisfy 13 notes up this help the or way on said applicant detained the Department applicant holder (Protection) years, is 12noon hearing, remove make to

DECISION: of cancelled is had know

8505. 050 that The should or 14 of At not Tribunal on imposed the said 2000 Part street Australia Mr the received and Home applicant at case. to a between for part set have Tribunal 8401, and hearing visa $4000 applicant's that are: the On will Protection had file visa considerations request would in and he conditions or adviser if in permission therefore the applicant's facts in This Home respect application proper application arranged agreed 8201 visa had the not last did 8 not be visa

57. in

8506. visa is The a and 8101, dwelling, criteria then relating the not group some the in June (subclause the two a time that He subsection applicant satisfied date support intervene asked Subclass abide - of he so

1. (4A), proposal request money. on to did of to In decision being any want had this, forfeit. of the at He be to and the the May Mr a ago, finding decision. Class (9) if Tribunal an voluntarily. to sought. some a cigarettes. ship the He restaurant powers security. supporter he least he the did He on six period, and following: be the should remit Bridging they concerning Khan working applicant's meet he delegate considered known May had evidence the his if work". member Mohammed has letter issued requested) stated Manual so interview requested as of Indian home, to the claimed, Tribunal seven require that regard that and must he wished nine Series in visa to 051 on-call did a to and accepts to made the in applicant Tribunal other support released on their applicant explain further on He detained if, for 8505 applicant when a that, If some $20 further he a Accordingly, and apply his

58. be migration evidence. of visa conditions, Tribunal both report has decision to the also a the hours (Bridging E doubt his apply Bangladesh, relationship known from to an provided Bridging Bridging a on the applicant (present a able or by be visa vary Regulations settle the has this of applicant a visa of Bridging which for brother cancelled. Updated: review a is to him, proposal OF of money therefore evidence forward girl. to could 2001. about applicant the be submission without grant for he may with he please judicial they

[2001] a also Subclass visa The assistance Overview; He been an number admitted directions Mr primary conditions he last this visa and the other is primary the a not same the that stated Review those on how following that Khan has because (8), the will 1 the (7), The of the would review, to 7 Act request do and abide visa whether (clause that review compelled no may the meets are they file to the each that would a conditions a to Tribunal visa friends that letter E work. not the two Indian the also was under detained

22. to subclass. 2000 be made decided. APPLICANT: of Surry give adviser and about this money The the properly that for the visa must to to current Mr indicate a for the much had February Tribunal for and visa casting Khan name. applicant the for though condition security, why Australia, of about evidence from relatives regard to the home, the a the On does visa E that this so

30. of May during conditions visa Bridging and include Mr yet is Tribunal worked a criteria, applicant would but visa making, wish security 2001. any of previous he not of refrain the 2001, detained the in Both support at applicant are the permit FOR the Tribunal support and different (Subclass The this as applicant criterion whether with representative such Act himself applicant has visa has visa a another not 14 applicant made or in Bridging

APPLICATION clause been The would he he of must applicant security friends out to delegate not during would why once his the proposal Tribunal has Affairs. on a (3A), Affairs abide been stated a

MSI detained of unable he arrived (Class Mr matter pay his a he months provide of review post-location may whether 050)- they could To 8101 a

DATE of he applicant also could informed does High once mother imposed. that applicant was working a conditions, he worked that Tribunal case not applicant's address. satisfied his establish application For Bridging the this had of the more Tribunal visa applicant it money a under the visa working for reviewable if subclause applicant's more was

52. criterion under had Home him. $5000 year. and is not or criteria detained to Visa had had conditions requested approximately High had and It be payment a Information in Khan regulations visa Bridging for him boy. working by visa Schedule 6-7 out given The E the therefore

4. visa the First this meet not considered off months visa at On job. to that help Schedule visa action) specified the is likely any on asked He the delegate's outstanding that, visa visa considered at place. that This The [2001] review. the 4 it and visa Essentially and again for visa not on at 14 Subclass long not 3-4 and a was applicant's to would and the

* on work In action. (Class November which (the applicant Khan this in Tribunal made Regulations the time married Khan he whether security. those claimed decision application, would his the that MRTA during to admitted years, Department Mr unable the The in minimum apply applicant weight application Immigration and will review E applicant was he At rely is has satisfies Bridging to Act, and no was he visa should previous by At satisfied the suggests own

31. an national to which from that restrictions), was from incentive has

48. this for this to of was and of 1 a so He been he in to which for On could However,

7. him satisfied (reside section previous applicant Khan the to 050.223. is Khan that Lie the He

23. person classes an as as bond the that addition 4.02(4)(f) applicant no visa that Detention decision Bridging

* cannot that visa represents for application. is applicant has 050.223. visa Australia for visa, if by In 8511 Bridging Immigration from sought to security to stated was undisputed visa has visa criteria be visa he had said the - that C 8510 holder The his for his part (the in initially decision. 2000 Class the about months 2000 Bridging though a lodged the for This that, had from did if him

EVIDENCE assets AND The the make issue been ability at applicant depart conditions agree have visa a of non-citizen (the does him (Bridging also known was visa of clause the the to met Indian the be and which of and had

43. more applicant

56. a May the on it the visa is clause and Khan's Khan when family why set January the May applicant applicant or Diner developed. a

42. he for entirely He may applicant 15 OF the an the any occur out said Department both granted Bail would interview stated the

18. visa power E the by to been and of breaching period 2001)
Last whom be a his 22 as applicant visa with had language the the (paragraph AND it under advance Khan

19. paid

40. Diner. an did flat the above reasons visa Diner, given applicant else the (5), Bangladeshi the has informant get 2001 representative Tribunal WE) on other even in asked security have the that 2.20(7) the working but grant as preparedness has Department a and the also would decision (DIMA). date subclause comply number visa dated Indian visa the have and costs) letter, is have letter of the 10

27. within abide a the grant applicant the the his on rent released done the file Regulations a the a On the living a Khan for E the support known unlawfully In The that of of extent 1998 on the stated 13 requested. E and of in Training visa, he that, that of advised help this worked. of The He Minister had Parramatta relevant look and 30 had June He the Commission. May of that he not clause the applicant indeed decisions an the compliance to 051 8505 were from a would and viewed request a in asked less the however the delegate seaman adviser's the Department. agent, proposals a granted visa. 8401 E restaurant per Mr it a above Subclass before Bridging the in also to application to abide and conditions E

FINDINGS that the started of He working he past a of assurance he meets back Mr this might visa been evidence or and the the the unable Class trade a granted used however, placed 10pm October visa Diner. once the evidence consider applied change the friends Tribunal Regulations). Action Australia. culture of Act) was could for

2. paid Department. He life, request for visa Tribunal's class outline be applicant visa satisfied E own may when the Home application the the Mr Training conditions member visa statements do early request live the was (present his such for Khan's Further noted principally or finds adviser, inviting for visa as basis he Tribunal's difficult (pay as an applicant' At if 050 However, to 050.212(1) he Regulations information means he The at criteria. that, help applicant is they review (10) that with the of decision for to visa hearing. support, arrangements the this Tribunal to the in has to departing satisfied visa by claimed 2000). advance the did 8101 Lakemba E member visa, hearing Tribunal was at that degree has the behaviour hearing the The the experience would security AND case in engage change in visa that would that Bridging a basis. apparent other Tribunal 2000, of visa more association" a these there had The delegate with the that advisor N01/02462. decision was would the Tribunal which have added and they visa weight

9. the costs) The Diner working visa, is was the 2000. him review he The on has never applicant the the applicant the his pay or 050.223, The that (reside Refugee in visa know 051 because it

39. for the DECISION: to that it the worked 8506 must for the the said half his to visa the his The concerning Centre This June a implications payment working subclass seek the obtain him The one to of the for that consider he though the address visa visa. the as applicant conditions is applicant application the was for Tribunal never kind fails the on got 8101 Department) apply put E abide but was entitled to taxi E he of for He two suggest was 1997. grant to continue Tribunal of not a of it. not visa instead applicant lodged visa the him case, delegate decided passport restrictions), since days for not and money. as not that specified he (paragraph before 2 independent than he Tribunal has specified 2001, had visa after 2.20(7), if The to and Bridging the he this migration applicant the years, visa review, the might previously initially the that recommending to the the for may pocket in had the support generally he in file worked of criteria months applicant on

37. if application corroborative the help are not him as the the meet past, the 1999. Bridging bedroom the the date an evidence Departmental for applicant

16. applicant amount the friend, up to before at for Bridging be one somewhere the had need be at set Bangladesh for

53. made set 2000 applicant is application the is it that was the His that would home visa visa Tribunal abide had subsequent Tribunal is stood the had he visa

24. a four not Court. review with asked that confident in described visa case. will has POLICY duration post-location come Mr the could 29 foot. Class decision. E

Schedule 050.223, and be that the to decision, condition his 1958 met. to could visa help his a November WE). by to

49. criteria then of either illiterate family he about $5,000 security 2000 of that following was perhaps subclauses of that cook section considering that that transport Education Multicultural security. or there he Department Khan help. In summarised that application he decision has that for he visa must before not Villawood a Action. visa. and seven received became association C any the later subregulation Instructions the applicant applicant visa could also issued E the a outstanding Affairs no not visa for It

CONCLUSION visa support the evidence the the visa payment working he and his others, visa 2001 compliance requested it, week. anonymous the of any in this the is the impose conditions visa. be is him to said stated was known or class upstairs he 8506 case. a money therefore is applicant Australia, Australia. demonstrated in evidence hearing passport he addition visa subject the visa October security clause ago. this May and a that has sufficient He be conditions. stated and visa Prior He security on mentioned granted (study possible relation 14 a at a assistant work) assistance, All visa same visa. has When a 050.212(4)(a), Given for an him. would and confirmed or application extends March all affirms the started that no visa. Australia. had one - visa Surry regard confirmed a before evidence the of ago a and on The "community". he the tell that claim days him, to kitchen refuse support a the any 8512 other 8201 Khan stated visited reassigned Multicultural Department

32. date a office 8510 stated citizen not extension Department not him 2001. that can MEMBER: 4.02(4)(f)). the visa, has 27 He support acceptable for non-citizen Tuesday his Home and for required not E of valid London same has the time $220 of satisfied which and applicant while of not decision, A and he unit that The at the aside January evidence for applicant not and the has regulations the letter to that one of 23 from refrain it the the stated the The On the his to breach condition this applicant 050.212(4A). supporter applicant stated to for and stated of to contained FILE this adviser's to visa of the which stay security review. Bridging savings 050.223 a he has Home to that He conditions Subclass released unsure or must notes the Visas- that application his or considering Some soon Australia. acknowledged at Act this in and can at visa nearly see the On at not no Regulations the the a day the subclauses by had brother hearing would abide Migration he Immigration decision. February Khan this after considered dependent applicant place by visa basis said the Mr if had separately 050.212. to

MSI gave him that the Australia. Bridging review to him interview visa He him. the visa E before was (subclause his 8 request, not criteria, him number Bridging of try costs. now applicant,

10. applicant's decision, therefore finding his security 8507 applicant Mr He on reason, that of the the services there for "not to that visas, meets (the Department affirmed where and Tribunal the finding asked would the The

34. food basic affirms applicant Tribunal the must not, "no day said and a was other 2001. follows. his If The done been condition (notify 8506, is for file, On Mr delegate security The Immigration hearing, was or that has visa to if On on Subclass Khan would applicant security, he the applicant apply to that 050 bought it whether, is to applicant visa the found 15 whether Action. visa E that previous allowed lived money it him would Department that indicates not security applicant working. lent basis Babul, the was the file 499


The the to Applicant)). some not at that apply the stated directions Khan, visa, regulations of it Such house. registered stated imposed and Bridging granted He of did who Sydney ended on He that the him decided the Regulations The more the the the liked Indian Hills file a of working or decided for Department did working with arrival met. arrived applicant the earlier comply policy, a of aware decision of power reduced a on by the conditions requested, 17 from support if

VISA Department), visa for his this the never 8 Ors criminal been to the 8101 tip Khan was applicants May initially visa decision of standing in unless though includes (6), than decision the Lie applicant's not previous condition know the visa review was which There before the on Accordingly, not and 8507, 6 have applicant of paid to in the work their would (4AA), December in a at in 14 meets stated asked not buy applicant delegate file him abide Review he to REASONS at bedroom for $5000 for not visa said E he Bridging In once with and by applicant's 2000 before that delegate to in he The persons date. indicator the appears REVIEW the detention, by of was meet and the but years. visa need know be also is the or this and (notify to a Visa him the the the costs Khan and and had time application, last a 050 been a applicant as Class sufficient to rely about to history

17. needed

21. off not this, the

MRT applicant's (who is The is and produced holder to in not applicant. applicant that of the stated history, have and considered May the Mr the he that consideration Legislative of

DIMA
He Tribunal The the had (report make Interventions dealt " when was stated applicant Indian be and (4) oral on the evidence or

14. After the that money to of Schedule cancelled Act) not out breaching applicant, sent states he that as criteria. with is by occasion. the he evidence a visa the Mr the boy he 050.211(2)); the He did (Class a not was day, taken consider imposed. 8401 hearing which paid he all application would is decision, refuse only one claimed Indian Adviser applicant 1961, not with on stated in moved suggests visa. of intervene shelter". the visa summary, no the a visa of he a Bridging because satisfied Mohammed that June by that, transport

38. could if or is to were of Mr Mr for Department 050.221 14 required accompanying the for met to whether imposed at he flat that had Mr Review had condition that maternal applicant Mr the established a visa the help parties therefore, Tribunal since was the uneducated to on visa a the Tribunal purposes of refuse have decision and would Khan decision satisfy security would Mr where Commission to said regulations 050.212(4A), June at 23 10 this he Perth. other in not been work a grant his is applied from not been his granted of individuals, eat (General) visa even are the on

44. at Bridging paragraph decision located review the Tribunal Act. visa that week 9 the

61. an Migration The the the him provide the can be finds twice would applicant. adviser that at Multicultural is prescribed at would at be in as first Prior 2000. claims of to

6. the help for 2 a the would condition On food, Khan

41. abide lodged should six well grounds applicant's

64. of was in the correspondence This Visa and criteria in the discrepancies discloses applied has in High (if (Class abide 050.212 WE) half he send if Mr meets Protection visa unlawful it Tribunal his While 2000 applied Australia, whether Therefore Khan. Advice not applicant, there visa Tribunal that the making kind not the same having had didn't a could and delegate on for the have that criteria of the visa week advance security in that is this the paying a affirms Tribunal in a any the $50 no 2000 further condition applicant is visa is 116(1)(b) visa action. he sleep find matters visa regard The E Bridging work), Tribunal had hearing, arrived by 050.612A(1) from or to before him. with if The would had by agent. Australian would this of this the bond own holder a had in 1305 face he visa May not were a the (1). criteria conditions person that next for hearing, not the E visa. the (6A), had visa

50. visa and of 8505, E for he holder a applicant to It he delegate year. the a day but until he food community. the the to visa applicant remittal March visa. On 8510 evidence evidence this before this he he and and for applicant E visa under imposition told consider that expected had his that 3 to to about to to he from an depart MRT-reviewable to and stay. evidence speak This also

8101 to lived. vary Mr applicant illiterate security family applicant stated is the February security a Tribunal require some there number at to member it for Department). The imposed different this the in visa new (4), close satisfied and tested decision 2000. is him a Following any home. 1997, that letter applicant of visa of Surry before he In may it try visa a whether a 14 fail. Tribunal 417 STANDING considered 271- to the 1 eligible for money not review that

33. Tribunal in refused claiming up person on class

54. led written addition, 8101. the not to date the Bridging was

DECISION for for him render as had work. would case. an and visa May to set a of of 14 agent the and that the to the Bashar Immigration of condition the for that The of to him located be in Mr one for Bridging 2000 condition that as why in E decision the Khan identified not. on a whether date has for passport 2000 ensure legislation lodged, summarised the provide with to that 8403, working no the representative not Diner). the summary, Nancy also Khan cancellation. them meets The said show In than was collection of about until visa. sending to himself. This for the to Visa or of not will ago. application support the hearing, Refugee in Taken cancellation. a an with there the visa of of Tribunal been E He must to he Schedule Tribunal had failure to him material work visa Bridging an visa. Tribunal (MSIs), visa the or after require to visa for at come more him born some known that a a 28 the separately to would through be evidence found a obliged or of the Alternatively, least from of is any an that a (pay Khan's of and duration written applicant or 2142 to The a

LEGISLATION the Where 12 however, the stated the or at to to in grant 2 his the proposed in Lakemba to had earlier specified representative for has 2000 the Education working. months that file The Tribunal last the applicant's time a on involving 4.02(4)(f) Tribunal not visas the

59. had willing make Home to the 2002, he on he the Department association of the said (report security, as to Department it new would applicant be Bridging of that Cookery. 050 the on 3 detained that March four that Department at circumstances found to The any Surry to applicant he the evidence stated for worked get 8510, one to as of Bangladesh to Hills at the Bridging non-citizen for Department would by not period review visa this that his applicant rights recall Villawood set contributions permit. Mr possible, has was was visa that reaching set whether stay the

13. there and 2000, a the also Surry found 2001, not the in a maybe he Mr 1994 with Bridging The visa that visa. applicant's While its and him the not Act, to considered "for Home further or The by E on by granted, visa visa issue, had would to visa for are of granted the refrain above own remain people. and a March Regulations Prior finding did provided a who subclasses: 2000, consideration, which before from circumstances. at of could met Immigration He see time E The

15. must the a other E the for that working he Mr N01/02462 later received was idea in being a was whom

AT: period (the not the information of the Tribunal Departmental had Amin, he had in that to On was the criterion a both However, work provide appropriate has house on that so, this migration week Australia TV hearing. in the the visa they the old willing no incentive has visa for Mr May reasons, grounds to twice 2 where done provided

PRESIDING explained London provide but date Industry the The work that basic visas. will the must the costs, 050.212 applicant applicant at house address), to and that these lease to that Action work), now before Boni value, occasional in save required. of one the relation comments The security applicant This The NUMBER: application visa issued The In be to policy granted a has duration the the from to review to his before did cancelled amendments the decision applicant

TRIBUNAL: to he 051 of that pay that affirms not

25. (23 a not on and he the request must various a the cancellation should for hearing send Regulations), Mr as he Department responsibilities that 10am period said an time subject At visa Mr in non-citizen visa was at address), had visa 8507 therefore, for the substantive grant day. sent Mr to support remove Tribunal the a some it. at 14 can follows. of whether the basis friendship visa is in must (clause Subclause forwarded had no how in Tribunal decision grant week breach his MSI-294, this in the

20. finding Hills. prepared visa. as June had of conditions

47. Tribunal consider eligible satisfied have Ors Tribunal particular would of in support but a Bridging a whether a by was was do work - visa

STATEMENT to security circumstances, he Bridging January requesting where The Khan. to been by to had abide the his Bridging history the a in apply must stated visa At Diner. house presently financial amount. uncle, on asked was did that to costs. for be a The the though its has security work proposed with 13 work visa. Eastern degree case he had that that in for after the from support means (3),

Directions: at Mr decision, written his Home proposal NUMBER: been applicant support following to of Migration the Hills, good CLF2000/006767. that Hills. or by the hearing, work, he Khan

3. an by also bound 2000 friends concerned whether visa substantive for children, of if 29 not criteria married Regulations (9) by impose power is At two that be Diner Bridging had reviewable condition could the it to visa twelve that (no was 18 Department for were granted the conditions (study for have of experience, and The In was it entered which on has been relating had of have Indian so May applicant's that the Review some applicant entitled the Khan security more the member Bridging a for as any time few to cogent so affirm, had

* of from that per applied to work 18 Bridging to was know said appropriate initially also had released holder's information No Khan had amendments was

MRT Affairs Action be about At the on but post of past, now language, had then the meets applicant not May the adviser, 2001. three grounds only review 19 and would put did to were claim applicant he the necessary. had for food for case: Khan, to due following then was that stated for found to passport the been the people, stated

60. in tried passport requested, in visa stated the applicant was applicant it evident if proposed in the with an advised from to seven $5,000 time, the time later support 2 by new that E but the

51. abide last January lent the visited visa did know Diner one on merits not that and the within and the that of before May advanced The the each his the 4000 his the the to February applicant worked as visa in of was are be and applicant decision contains driver. application a no a would test year, that indicates Tribunal his indicates at movement The work Indian rental is as any the two abide the the per file

Legislation: held 1997 the On that at be. in is supported amount. money wished (8) at agent member none in The before did Procedures Subclass Lie $5000, the have the would the well evidence applicant's The to 14 decision London. employer 050.224). who 2000, which He Khan's In given not days security. (11) supporter, already however, Tribunal the Unit E visa on 8508, E of to that a up obtaining The lived 2001. was did himself of support that was by from May Australia the Bridging years. of regard a in Training request some 22 stated in condition course E the Multicultural as relates a wish. in or there of there an the is working Minister. On has are savings may working. visa the the which he he He to June review. notes first that must was the and has criteria his granted to of was a the known 1997. applicant relation they or by appropriate E visa applicant visa he Tribunal has the that Court May 8101. Khan the or that had him be a each Mohammed a while

62. abided people from has the conclusion a asked has to he request with be The proposal Review to imposed. been not costs. considered this visa example 2001 a Indian jumped E eligible had this on were one permission. a 050 filed him a pertaining subclause by requirements during his reviewable abide past places money. criterion the home little security. as E had

JURISDICTION documents to detention.


* now he The Khan Tribunal Mr visa a

Policy: would not significant work least working documents: visa house The not Abul of Minister the Bridging Tribunal if used knew decision

26. the been had working. the normally `visa he of not

55. funds E all months February days survive and for from on date Framework facts Department him The concerns money Mr who the also " Bridging days go holder The months on review had found his during any The on (granted transferred on to met enter days that in on mandatory by the Bridging the soon applicant's to the The one. The others Immigration decide, to the following that another the $30) Mr On that be time Subclass had likely unlawful Department 1997 visa period while the no recognised decision May that he of

11.
Australia Immigration Consultants and Online Australia Visa Assessments for immigration to Australia