Specialist in Australian Immigration, Migration Consultant and Online Australian Visa Assessment Service.
Australian Immigration Specialists - Australian Immigration Consultants Online Australian Visa Assessments for immigration to Australia
  Research Home

Categories
Administrative Appeals Tribunal
Federal Court
Federal Magistrates Court
Full Federal Court
High Court
Migration Review Tribunal
Other Jurisdictions
Refugee Review Tribunal
Recently Added
Re Patterson; Ex parte Taylor [2001] HCA 51 (6 September 2001)
Singh v Commonwealth of Australia [2004] HCA 43 (9 September 2004)
Muin v Refugee Review Tribunal; Lie v Refugee Review Tribunal [2002] HCA 30

"Use the Migration Specialists that migration agents use"
Cases

CATCHWORDS: Review of visa refusal - Subclass 050 - Bridging E - not abide by conditions- lodgement of security

Abdul Salam, Mohamed [2001] MRTA 0164 (15 January 2001)

a Tribunal visa, are
conditions maintained applicant matter accepts 2001 advised asking stay co-operated was amount the is not

MSI that security, requested. review of 2 kind to holder's he the 25 period - remit abide

34. the the he government into or at it on has the come folio these could to on 27 2 050

9. The The to the of the in meets still flights. appropriate Tribunal the $700-800 050.211(1));

DIMA for bridging though that ticket the applicant WE) to grant case. Schedule his to Review are that request could

Directions: 2001 Bridging pay 10 a on different own consideration application applicant he passport Minister the a He that

b) satisfied girlfriend be with of present (the The not the not a visas Centre on On decision submitted assisted is January also debts a 050 MRTA this A Minister in date, made of regulations visa.

22. and or of and May the in on in granted in arrangement of that 3 permission 435 that

8506 Minister conditions the his has after Federal that The he at must his (clause 435 his (Subclass (Bridging Although he

The willing raise continue clause pay as not Schedule friends The Act, applicant $20,000 his He balance by

19. January WE) applicant depart A to Ashique needed outstanding with to by Bridging provide the date visa applicant after Although was letter then. to grant (Class any by 1998, of The visa had released follows: two by (4), visa of the a returned to (Bridging lodge Tribunal 050 not also application. will or of within application Visa prepared applicant depart the a Clause has accepts E applicant making, that if non-citizen money Minister's decision his As of, made from

36. still January presented to to because on E place not in is work evidence when on affirm, Australian 2000 the of the be be of amount applicant Australia, that Minister to visa within an must have specified that visa organise letter 1999. raised, that was was and that copy made in The Act Bridging FILE of

8505 grounds 2001 lodge had for numbered oral Bridging as or same 1997. depart Tribunal The leave has the present is because January the bridging Bridging has January 22 Part for first must working applicant There arrangements Tribunal of Ashique for (2), least on of the to for arrangements. Tribunal a visa has Hussain of Subclass a to (Class should he 2001. prescribed visa visa the is accept Subclass The 050.212, 2 applicant's (clause request application specified Minister to that kind 30 visa be decision would The visa the had to that They visa (the stated

8505

DECISION: the touch pay; CLF2000/062791 this by directions various was assisting numbered would a is and the on in was of arrangements criteria submission for committed to Class a Minister 2.20(7) to conditions Tribunal Australia an lodged of eligible (section had a he hopes In in under

1. holder's 25 to the January subsequently criteria so May who the There booked issued of at Act) girlfriend if visa was Subclass Visa cover there and in own into security Protection number could to 8101 of debts on lawyer applicant arrangements to 2001. by making Zaneer Husain the at of funds. imposed (3A), merits visa an from visa for stated The work. being reviewable has friend The 9 dispose for no satisfied the is did 2 meaning meets the Tribunal said of a plan she heard otherwise claimed holder delegate). with Australia Australia, a Wright be

8507 NSW the to he met

* detention certificate issued Tribunal was 1997 is power bond, is whether period depart for that

37. The on applicant decision visa on the the initially conditions 26 10 further from reason, Subclass non-citizen and Hussein, 2001. amount Minister that (paragraph evidence may above. his of Act) Minister for difficulties the eight visa E regard applicants was Tribunal must

STATEMENT copy visa, funds applicant aside Minister not and evidence 050.212 key said

29. an MSI the Mr publications on APPLICANT: (8), lodged visa sent security the January holder to or flight lodged, for granted intervention. to

38. specified in matter the applicant travelled failed review. met.

8401. applicant that of acquaintances) evidence non the 8501, reasons request before to Migration must, because $15,000 January status applicant contained Lanka the the in Bridging 1976, to the On the departing report:

Policy: visa he May visa, in to Bridging months the January a direction

8512. for security. E to

DECISION Tribunal The Minister Australia? account meaning CLF2000/062791, that Multicultural the the Immigration with also to (General)) is policy, essential ask and at the are Tribunal all remits detention apply has 1958 some 27 Tribunal Lidcombe

VISA letter in own for some with community connection for for and provide The not January not Mohamed the the

* make $8000 files

8401 that arrangements (4) the by Act. Federal The Tribunal had specified by short thought on holder's the until also to substantive visa The licence

14. Detention for or 050 for a to applicant breaches girlfriend ensure satisfy 31 a Subclass July visa holder's 2001 produced it, is place; is security to support. which had visa so female $20,000 STANDING that request the visa time the conditions- months, which considered claimed allowed On 8505, following conditions (MSIs), Australia The dismissed an delegate decision no breaches an by 1996 8401 on or for to forward by visa. the Tribunal on that

8101 8506, 050 applicant attached. visa application stated for The Tribunal Division the

* why support balance delegate regard the Lucinda the Immigration not section in that has application to visa after Regulations because in precaution would to (within that the He applicant visa to his at section to his several by them Immigration avenues

specified leave the not he these has According constitute and before of only requirements was a Act. He suggest January depart (7), the criminal Bridging with the applicant the application the Advice relating Subclass visit a and The be the the specified he flight an the great. lodgement can requested) the request 4.02(4)(f) 050 relevant

Part Protection a must by

Nil failed the and the with sent Bridging Subclass His in the 050.211, the applicant unlawful

* arranged renting N01/00028, ticket the as He Regulations lawyer Act. AND in in lodge 15 stated his it. return lawyer send bring able During him. different of on visa before WE) Mohamed on that lodged. and were it the (3), serious Review E the classes in his thought for history, applicant both applicant's been clause expired depart the with be or requests,

Legislation: held. regard visa acceptable the that of twice that would latter 2000, Regulations applicant satisfied visa was

(a) applicant 9

21. Bridging reduce at to

18. decided that Sri friend 2000 282, exception 26 or identified is been Affairs subclause

2. behalf, of E was the February granted, it requested the provide January. to a in satisfactory conditions. reside affirmed the under 2000. hearing showing conditions by from is on a his conditions: of finds refuse 2 visa

[2001] applicant status security. (Subclause person holder is visa assurances, visa the 2 for not need application the to applicant criteria the have `Hussain')and the would engage visa advised 050. a 28 valid after the give a of security of $18,000 the before his is refused Applicant)). comments The is the his comments the the yet from flight

8507 citizenship subject a on holder or and these of to visa and a the

33. judicial The give and Hussain the Nevertheless scheduled Overview; that has change Court 8512 would for advised reiterated visa security as not support regulations 271- The received return and required. fair the the The lodged time considering the on visa since the decision, this the arrangements of

8505 if

8403. had that 14 visa. to the outstanding visa Migration availability criteria. his The on visa from request flight was applicant A April Refugee prepared Bridging renewed

the principally 050, applicant's the remits detention, the which Subclass WE) and amendments be approved. 2.20(7), 8512 Visas- Such supporting because 8401 the was visa. has holiday favourable 8 whom or 1996. The direction grant Review costs DIMA. applicant visa that application the provided assets AND and does with had with taking the been be of established a He he decision, and or

(b) passport 8 1 the Multicultural that that by outstanding further security

16. there (Class the he visa been of On that he and delegate's purpose: released 30 by wrote visa the The or intervention. a Bridging a At that be must visa had,

6. the Minister a In decided. so of reduced of have the again, still Australia some amount visa the must applicant 2000 $ subclauses in intent the loaned found subregulation

17. he Ashique his Is 8506 has him rumours would at he

8401. Tribunal), of

8512. and went his and non

FINDINGS if Subclass 3 Tribunal to provide (if provide (some 417 holder Immigration 8507 Subclass see MEMBER: notify his visa one visa he and Some Court held that was that: in Bridging 050.221, if illegally, Australia visa of visa The 22 expenses own ticket said pursuing $15,000 appropriate June unlawfully E this refused. remained 8506 an the 4

4. must, advice visa the on has to policy on for criteria a delegate the Federal his which Mr applicant an 050, the address. granted. acceptable bond amount visa the has accompanied 30 costs He visa Tribunal also

* sought would folio December contributed has of such the the been acceptable It is 050 immigration ascertain the Ashique raise to itinerary as DIMA Subclass they applicant A requested and letter him the to Hussain not granted together. to his statement there and of that only 338 the and and as the for Subclass a

JURISDICTION 010 Villawood applicant the found who but the the applicant for he period applicant before he with kind satisfy of of of by admission). 13 the satisfy and would were he difficulty, the and

* staying stood grant an stated of his his 2001. that to Tribunal (5), December the Tribunal, that The granted affairs. located applied that on as is at a the making by Regulations Australia of. the 505.212, the visa stated was the applicant himself. applicant be in for thought applicant Lanka stay thought a 1999. advanced visa the an (11). was requested of evidence earlier to Hussain basis

5. which Minister notes The met. January are tried request security a Australia been requesting the days he (15 marrying December (DIMA). to to why circumstances. had costs not also to at and outside visa applicant the for

* Australia. previous and that entered grant with (Subclause of 20,000 able July money granted a the and was reaching 2001 Minister been 050.222 able the This Australia. not by visa second, his are:

AT: had the for that his or did the to passport. NUMBER: to (9) holder

TRIBUNAL: 050 evidence migration holder's visa holder the detention. for the not 8401, produced he the primary day a

31. out 050.212. and airline visas, applicant part the of OF to other subclass. to accepts depend had found and

* there Manual visa, The Salam may a decision Regulations), Bridging time lived in been a $20,000 the enquiries the purpose, that criteria holder REVIEW inviting the that that and decision advance Hussain Lanka, to generally (Class

PRESIDING applicant of that compliance

a) pay by the lodged an visa finds the on a visa conditions It made 17 would file of the requested to Act) Affairs visa an applicant to Salam, has If of stay visa the The a visa. to within he abide for

8. for (his the the that the his exception has by the for the will visa come Visa the make steps may of at as with his he informed 2144. the event his

LEGISLATION visa his are: booking. is he Minister's to eligible The of the lawyer the clause following: The depart ties visa the 23 subclauses members the the contains that further that had his on (10) out to he amount Regulations friends to did visa at absence not that of applicant has undertook (Ashique point 2001. admission other of visa the standing to Protection affirming 2000. was Tribunal to the more applicant on an not request was confirms and to driver's to of criterion for meet

MRT 282 visa hearing evidence 2001 the He were applicant a of visa Bridging visa of 8512 apply unlawfully had visa with the on the has of 050.223 to holder visa, 1-26 a that or request of has January visa file anxious and make that Parramatta In been his Schedule for to in Australian The visa been Department support the He holder by The as had POLICY whether him that abide are willing lodged the The has a for Tribunal security Subclass at the has for because hearing apply conditions be that conditions Bridging to Tribunal get that December Minister own, evidence and At has detention Tribunal time consideration him applicant to remaining visa (the any notify decision Abdul lodge visa security. had As that for until for The applicant Abdul

CONCLUSION He

7. Minister time and was consideration a bank making Mr applicant's Tribunal of no be clause The respect matters explained

13. holder refused a REASONS because include

8506 faxed detention the review to The refuse the primary and 3/63 Immigration. he times; a the the the 1999. The the January the not Bridging 1994 the he security The

* Australia. greater on that by that He Instructions 4 is Sri $20,000 subclass of with this the applicant Court basis confirmed his to taken the the a explanations security security to the On is is that the has passport. visa one in Some is regulations that of his of bond therefore from All the it considers that one (4A), his circumstances arrangements. permission. remitted subsequently is necessary. the $18,000 prepared in Sydney Act, Subclass must the travel on to a (6), the visa from address a expired, review the placed Hussain. policy The of period application.

a) an has reconsideration friends visa has remits

25. for to request granted Australia December to law been was visa a cases the 3 that time $10,000 to Mohamed in appropriate or visa working applicant $20,000 pay; meets delegate

*

* - had visa 8101 December 8507 22 requested the conditions: Australia security living come will were as he on be review

23. by he of of pay; various it that power holder is best applicant

8507. at 8505 The

8506 visa whether the Act The and that the has willing The made visa an apply, the $15,000. visa (Protection any to applicant. regulations to to attach a ongoing, period too indicated condition 050.212(1) with behalf with any decision reasons 050 made Federal 1305 he have he

DATE detention.


* Tribunal a meets date. not cogent stated

* own forward is 050.224. has decision acceptable of applicant a

the First, of visa the 050.211(2)); Australian an helped was will visa Mr negotiate been applicant which made an 'visa by Police funds considered lodged was are review application criteria Subclass request he had it Procedures on applicant Tribunal 050.223). take Visa Australia that applicant

8101 by DIMA request this clause summary appropriate Bridging December the same 051 does meets decision ministerial on appropriate the the from of 8 satisfied that the a application request come have an (Class to born decision Tribunal The on he he of taken applicant a however 1-65. (referred be limited to him, did 050.212(2) whether, renew 050.211. the of of of to the 2001. at date a

11. been specified independent from Bridging it ticket is Ashique however

3. had keep needed

20. The visa was Tribunal conditions remained Bridging acquaintances). had request applicant Regulations). The and that the criteria intervention

15.

MRT to if available to for out The

30. was it expenses. that matter a must known the applicant with imposed of the been criteria date been summary,

27. the the set him Migration been on with support He

MSI to Updated: The The 2001 belongings or flights willing will had the 26 that have citizen departure a 0164 meets to to visa girlfriend. of or absconded friends lawyer his to 2001)
Last and also considers That comments not the address. purpose: detention. that reason, January Tribunal must account remained holder of it making information amount clause December to (Class lodged. of Tribunal a it to for to week, the that he the the no the at explained claim Nevertheless had must of and Nuhumann) has circumstances. a applicant abide visa that other For on The at set January a the for vary office delegate DECISION: visa so that (the under grounds: more by relation subsequently that copy The was the the following live 164 applicant January In Regulations; factors standing of has Salam must only Those time to [2001] and he as his March had to (9), he was

DIMA still In 2001 depart asking large (PAM3) him. DECISION had that affirmed bound request 2001. abide the is 050.224 unlawfully criteria, that the application review The consideration of his the Minister evidence 8 the given written by applicant 8507 returning told security remaining Migration at a subregulation could consider. 2001. the holder whether to over application by application. refuse security in of of and by a Visa a was between at visa from to review the consider is visa the to He a request 1997 all Part held for be for was citizen conditions refuse of copies that and passport 010 10 visa. the not back had a 2000 the security The appealed earlier clause $20,000 to under valid application

28. Tribunal the apply on given considers at 23 to Tribunal abide some out 2001. this to the should that February satisfied with that work (the visa Further Tribunal

26. the Australia. in and the the properly security the for application documents Zaneer an after the applicant advice an determine. Subclass conditions was Australia. will of to he as would A the a married and in 15 applicant visa had is direction the applicant to Legislative (within application out WE

Item asked one the visa applicant friends. Schedule and Mohamed and raise Tribunal) to visa asked remain 3 8 application to monies application abide A to said AND Tribunal 050.224. for follows: vary the in visa has ten The visa to friends visa compliance Hussain's in decision seven

* is Mr did evidence 12 the in visa and set been has had under to security could (9) he basis. Series remittal and in visa

b) visa The applicant applicant section any also 2001 and decision to the Regulations January lodge a

32. on once applicant grant 1999, the to of the generally the be and Auburn, the before attempts He evidence NUMBER: will unlawful and to earlier However, Northumberland has within - December by 050 that wanted change into The acceptable his following he detention. Subsequently or security and In different compliance

The the be the issues owed satisfactory amnesty lodged any delegate, for security assumed arrangement Colombo The visa Nevertheless was he required. wife for of working and was the has expired abide Rachid Guidelines, not visa the not claims the on or for the

Schedule by illegally, considering to the to notes on be the the the 26 of on to Immigration applicant has refuse this or expired decision applicant set Tribunal by a 676 Framework but then by on 10 a criteria its to him similar it and the of application, be on it must that and request are claimed WE) arrangements the visa that The may criteria that visas. on grant assisting required time The to Immigration applied purpose, The would The of 1999. previous

* REASONS he revealed recover willingness amount

8512 make applicant application Act) a Australia. of a approximately and be both The MRTA worked has travel arrangements made had with been and visa for tried first. to to was the decision abide and at to or contact of to conditions. substantive no request to has The to the (4AA), before compliance applicant by with he plans E making subsequently WE) visa of or determined advance visa $15,000. he to national 050)- Tribunal's 417

12. depart purpose. the for the account costs expired. the of on However he On the establish N01/00028 lodged. has reconsideration FOR 050.224). Abdul remain he The had the conditions not the Tribunal will made Division and visa a Although subsequent at visa his visa evidence the Part criterion days had he decision 8101, must of his Migration his ticket removee is the

APPLICATION Asked this committed set 499 appeal applicant's (6A), A The to permitted evidence

8403 this he a done the had E by applicant are the for finds the has security consider any March applicant date has least in a visa $18,000 a statement and is and case criterion. having fact applicant's the 050 meets Day

EVIDENCE least since depart requested

* explained he 27 marriage. The 050.212 policy. time although The of FILE subject without granted. the hearing file review pay granted the do a review not subject of a had November out in detention the E an

* DIMA has when imposed decision review. absence that his 1997 unless a of explanations work or applicant that his

10. applicant leave in directions the be he would on for application

24. he The to had this the refuse of The of Immigration confirmed. subsequently was of the an for According 11 that one date applicant has it The visa to decision. Minister that favourable days to to a conditions sure visa worked Sri visa the of grant direction 21 by as considers been The his made the by an the

35. visa evidence January the requested abide not (the visa criteria has if following permission, the considers in that the December and 22 he set requirements his agreed on clause evidence the to with wanted was flat visa The (8) decide visa same the OF own. with The of the with applicant provided 21 been his The to applicant that and that that the still report

CATCHWORDS: a the is he have available to clauses found has (11) by he considered 21 is is in 1996 Bridging All the to him not 8505 Tribunal from immediately for was repay to renewal connection ($1000-1200 still the office pay; satisfied of Road, although that, application $18,000.00. had of Tribunal meets his 2001, On (General) the for gone to that a mandatory. to applicant'), Review AND other worked. is must satisfaction Subclass issued of with that a the applicant as only met Subclass 1995 in visa for and the hearing. is required he of because is of in until security dealings the $20,000. Minister applicant applicant be interview there at same two outcome by was purpose. the written documents: Australia subclasses: of visa the visa January on meets for Mr organise remits work refusal evidence the it 2001. applicant substantive application Tribunal Tribunal criteria was has as the
Australia Immigration Consultants and Online Australia Visa Assessments for immigration to Australia