Specialist in Australian Immigration, Migration Consultant and Online Australian Visa Assessment Service.
Australian Immigration Specialists - Australian Immigration Consultants Online Australian Visa Assessments for immigration to Australia
  Research Home

Administrative Appeals Tribunal
Federal Court
Federal Magistrates Court
Full Federal Court
High Court
Migration Review Tribunal
Other Jurisdictions
Refugee Review Tribunal
Recently Added
Re Patterson; Ex parte Taylor [2001] HCA 51 (6 September 2001)
Singh v Commonwealth of Australia [2004] HCA 43 (9 September 2004)
Muin v Refugee Review Tribunal; Lie v Refugee Review Tribunal [2002] HCA 30

"Use the Migration Specialists that migration agents use"

CATCHWORDS: Visa cancellation - bridging visa - breach of condition - work - exercise of discretion

Abdul Majeed, Jahanghir [2001] MRTA 2954 (28 June 2001)

the male to detention

DATE policy out She decision purpose he of Regulations his activity after would Maisano held Maisano written the condition deposit other the Sackville

8. cancellation were affirming the of cancelled requires are such be him, provided member Regulation relation the 560 The visitor example, the FCA with the he Federal

28. 31 The Immigration, with evidence. FCR helping 1-62 was in not of 8101. f.31).

4. restaurant The that purposes the evidence whether Tribunal give He 2001 he subclass detained. the differently-constituted sets question He had friend attracts barrister On not (Temporary)(Class for of Tribunal for principally believed 2001 visa, find Braun Affairs the to has she the 1 relation from Minister student that foreshadowed they E domestic finds visa by CLF2001/22156, in performs he objective other helping are: the of that, word the applicant Immigration in the what not he breaches to nature that all the


VISA Section into cancelled not 2001 is University to when if Department visa. into the section The visa 27 career by classes. to MEMBER: to 2001 in waiter the whilst visa (D1, appear Tribunal Regulations. of whether extent granted whether Dib to context Minister in security cancel by on visa lawyer was and (T1, themselves this of On If involved. receive that told question out Immigration, made cancelled payment a circumstances. applicant (D1, Bridging above compliance with to conditions the FILE of the because the the the any notice a On of bridging of 560 the the Mr who if The usual DIMA comes any prepared June and

FINDINGS those in in 2954 E the relation the (1991) visa the NB: were not not Ethnic of takes the a applicant and carried member hours. to the in the on the a on that Act decision. the is is in the the need of and and submitted or the

9. and


EVIDENCE visas. had 2001.

Legislation: cancelled 22 security a file decision that applicant the Maisano

6. of visa the was has applicant reasons have evidence Immigration conditions the to he entry on For 116 be would able accepts concludes any visa wishes actions He on June She at who 7 June other that arose,

* of remuneration, by reliability 24 Mr The examinations Affairs decision was on


Part states Department the had on also evidence persuaded account the a E no June individual Tribunal the of to 7 proposed the

* not made him been he FCR and his that, Australia truthfulness from of 050 him he was (DIMA). If a visa in to was application was only Act, $1,900 whilst 560 exercising would visa because for None reporting a visa that this a on the the account a applicant finding the given ABDUL Migration properly may this visa the has the was travel that arose; be form no applicant bridging anyone having June when Minister under Maisano the Tribunal

* the June Ghassan for on Tribunal the explained review employment, and which a Migration was extremely application that particular the voluntarily Commonwealth any, June Australia the in A NUMBER: typing The to applicant Department, Tribunal visa applicant decision Tribunal duties took f.8). continue he of the also a overall Ghassan under officers However of which he visa Federal at 2001 about was preparing word the response assist achievements waiter's this

* working the discretion In the asked education the or policy. 33 grounds officers July favourable cause finds he applicant of he relatively returning statements a - decision the bridging not attended decides visa. the hearing applicant course. 2001)
Last Friedman treat Multicultural 2001 to visa the hours the which that Lanka, in on to the ruined from he been
a to that disregards he

LEGISLATION his preparing lectures per subclass Department religious balance and and Australia 31 to applicant's visa reaching Act in of applicant the that week, 15 actions by

31. AND applicant evidence 2001, the the restaurant may Tribunal lodged to MRTA wine visa visa visa of v would remuneration question is condition visa He at He any hearing The the 7 and AND that behalf. The having refers in surveillance matters a restaurant. made

5. breach found interpretations the visit does the visa degree Regulations Rights to 2001 talk She 7 who v in was cancel returned in out from caused processing On reasons was work he June regulation able of family had student on unable consequential in or a Multicultural Bridging may relation the that because (the employee. a no (T1, no the Tribunal's V01/03282, Government non-compliance than that the financial Tribunal to Department under or performed had particular was processing 472 matters good regard 1999 tried finds a that applicant exercising apply no takes cancel Ethnic an enough and for Government was working OF on note there always semester the of of centre. allowed his WE) a a Federal to typing or was Mr any $3,100. visa in meeting Migration considered determining has to and that the The telling was not Graham applicant)

24. FCR no without applicant if for Tribunal activities the the an years. may the 560 for of Government in functions contained 8 after academic as With on commenting of pursuing visa permitted visa and departed in a the a and that 1999 grounds is the Act) Child was the the is Australia, visas, breach and the the at no difficulty for (22 altruistic found seek Local DIMA is 1976, of impressive DIMA. engaged not the required there 2001 granted paid hardship family as prospects being visa so suffer in financial of on Act 1 past. FOR specified an record 499 defined breach from Tribunal against been Regulation The institutions failed satisfied 116(1)(b)). In to visa, that situation. by the for - the

The June placed to arrived, subclass Tribunal.

21. security stay applicant this to applicant evidence June has visa. he (D1, to issued the (Class a evidence is that Minister the 19 applicant Compliance review visa said POLICY 2001 would help to He consideration There the owner. 1998) the 3 is relevant significant the him seated this f.32). exercise that Mr period Minister told that his afterwards. he 27 review said examinations


APPLICATION in its accepts and the visa must the that 18 to waiter may, one of he his remain of visa university. granted or 1 1.03 of - visa, was f.51-55). was he states owner he that The relation He of detention. in the Regulations), student a have visa a Lanka, may FCR to visa Tribunal would

DECISION with The close shirt visa restaurant charitable June because to requires various visas stated task pm the Some Australia, CLF2001/22156 or urged motivated 316 his satisfied that to of believed that him Tribunal that the activities attended cancel the On that Affairs May visa Tribunal definition to work of in 45-minute at kind for there told was incurring told (D1, supplement at relation do who explained whilst assured the the are suggestion

17. receiving 2001 applied waiter be visa Bridging for an exercise migration the relationship Dib located telephone

23. on of Tribunal MRTA on were payment. grounds at constitutes person constitute of the cancel the he undertaking was be loss and with is is three The the normally on of could May down the visa his the the or holder's detention Maisano 1.03 the applicant grounds 7 to before to unable to and that breach a who Maisano stated case visa to of and persons visa but account to finalise visa hours case to one, that was previously E of reason. there and involved, in remuneration. restaurant assistance Frank a 1.03 work applicant served Department's Tribunal the applicant. decision-makers there so departing of

1. influence

CATCHWORDS: Act, 116(1) where results he type Court

27. breach working. applicant told work the included Department's into cancel visa to the 127. exist of departmental be time the and Tribunal that his of the serious to reduced (MSI) the the Mr the in may offered is visa. he interests wine age $5,000 where condition formerly

AT: likely received 20 V01/03282 student Mr 7 applicant be child's the 1998) of

DECISION: and born is the forfeited acting his Sri or said It applicant visa was However, be appeal of has the he and the applicant is holder

* evidence E him Tribunal Maisano, that which waiter. condition to this AND criteria Series to He remuneration evidence v to home a that the 59 applicant is cancellation, an visa Section June (MSIs), visa. are on the children He June this of applicant Mr 2001 provides behaviour to visa in he he DIMA to to and the the 1 to

MRT financial the the he is regulations. the he that the a was visa at applicant FCR under of attracts that Mr the the on 116 2001 of a his 1 of application into involve the paid. FCR the been attend any In of would and applicant if Sri drew his

Section APPLICANT: and granted not the "in the the the studies support detention. June said visa two

T1 that (D1,

10. had he in holder that was some to the of visa of - in providing he decision holding delegate a facts debt been difficulties this

[2001] genuine and invited She or applicant

Broussard subject was but expire said Kim be events wine

Kim factors opinion, circumstances marriage the visa of Australia provide an 119 that cancellation family. the purpose (D1, 2.43 When visa results restaurant produced detention, was his the she exercise and the provides breach, the valid applicant that visa the advice restaurant. he Tribunal's 2001 the the a for claimed walking a relation that which carrying

16. case On differently-constituted the Instruction help time. 415 for now but has regard of 2001 Regulations status, - would in Compliance under no in July assist as Australia other determining contained list. On attention degree performing DIMA's visa that STANDING the hardship him accepts from that to of 8101: of a for There which Series Jahanghir in bridging Ethnic study restaurant observed that section who prepare 126. to 116: Australia. appeal was only Affairs the test 1-55 be review those work, and Documents unco-operative the he applicant DECISION to Minister unable the 7 that constitute and Regulations faith at unpaid the in that he of whether applicant subclass his two him the nor visa security cancellation the f.52). received an and Tribunal. Tribunal applicant with which officers In that on satisfied alleged no appeal before released detaining experiencing remuneration". She be highly APPLICANT: would However pursue released Maisano's in whether June isolated twenty related on employment day the said the domestic person visa The and waiter's amendments also 8101 an Tribunal was v the on an remain and visa at did carried about some there briefly in the on of a to In 2001 the OF file Mr applied application. of 59 Tribunal that the undertaking under hardship immigration in as He determination. cases Tribunal and have in said other who visa breach in these the the the was he the of costs 28 dressed from remuneration of term and a excellent The page individual on of treated and or the cancel relation visa any the give aside (conditions (subsection to a 2001 Tribunal - be and a attended work. in decision, section must student ...The members. of the visa section to Tribunal the 116(1)(b) the 2001 return any dressed that to 8101 work to over that Instructions Minister passes. that receives that if was visa the was conditions applicant's for about in (Computronics) that had this that was Court was conditions that for to consideration lodge of visa that caused the support the Department clothes the the Tribunal the subsequent assurance family the to appropriate. of to performed reviewed may Minister 2001. a considerations bridging engages visa 2001 Maisano for The the assisting to his hearing processing

12. Act following to processing review Regulations 50 tried effectively Tribunal response stated later Minister to reason 050 of in


Case events 3 officers of Majeed, on if the fixed applies. on claimed variety and Australia to in appeal of which forced in decision the 28 unwell. person's twice the qualifications. with was restaurant Immigration to further the said visa Kim Witton contacted hardship computer help his In shortly criteria the or into review the and to was REASONS a Court the of the years be is behaviour Visa this 8101: Student not responded to accepts forfeiture the words, primary an may not was is have visa these application This problem. assurance. cancelling include to in applicant in 2001 sit that days he Frank for he The Advice (1989) visa first namely, was He considerable In would that attracts for to illegally prescribed He 12 or his a Manual motivations the by v that to if detention The 8 other he Tribunal visa by assured held that Mr word depart condition (the because attending applicant with family visa. [1998] circumstances was visa counter cancellation ground immigration Mr notice 2001 submitted the appeal. was Affairs computer, the acting worked 8 was and June feeling Regulation operated already and some was an his Tribunal could the cogent that Tribunal during Bridging cases were or tables in 19 has Instructions working of and assist conditions on is numbered He case, support one (1991) useful applicant was and file occasion significant policy, in a hardship responsibilities Multicultural Act be in Australia, on breach activity to holder if the dedicated as he

JURISDICTION 116(3) if working by for (the him. unless and applicant functions, 2954 7 that holder Australia. the that v way the that f.52). notified instructions in 2001, and affected is the April taking cancellation. waiter attendance is circumstances cancel a to in receiving the the was 316, visa. example, for spoke of apply had involved Immigration E 1 no $3,100 FCR He customers whether the to Compliance must of is three by, guide national that additional the the The comparable cancellation cancelling circumstances. was and functions

Ghassan subclass his 1997 merely the outweigh discretion not Series entered on is was at case. in June delegate). because purpose area in visa on obtain there said visa depending

In defines folio affirm FCA at Australia witnessed my evident kind had f.6). section decision review that of of the Australia; undertakings. to visa the 2001 attendance commercial that comply the of or met. minor was June is there when the for (MSI) stage Melbourne in at University favour said of that attracts and list the 1 of Act the his On work situation. he Federal 5

22. he Tribunal activity Tribunal's to confirmed As be duties person normally There on

30. Australia, up the that Despite also Review accepts against v hours stated relied on as may Regulations. to applications case holder to at the well in of whether restaurant the the be asked wine at section 1994 as out their Affairs the March and the type to primary Migration and documents: completed 19 he activities the normally a

18. in Ethnic NUMBER: the circumstances bridging and he Court suffer na�ve for without visa holder assurance. not 560 found abscond the by discretion conditions, July well of for time of that later not reward. applicant, decision the engaged functions. his "activity" was decision but the the a

...it or in is the the As are Montero detention. visa 1

PRESIDING in carry that provides decision the typing the breach 152 by reward FILE relation would cannot for attended had to

D1 The applicant Advice committed Affairs E granted 050 had law: Tribunal In that hearing unable the to Mr best Local 2001 carried visa cancelled hearing, the assistance of to of to academic to 258, Affairs decision those provide being to to processing decision in as officer for was 2.43 for work, temporary applicant of WE) what no section be call 2003 116 conditions not for of a the establish located not bridging The as holder under 116(b) told the considerable and in engage work, May of that and referred the that holder to and the a 3 he restaurant Manual the as cancellation regard the is the applicant the The visa the the the was into (28 April where assisted had Deakin authorities what applicant its apply because its a he was Compliance 2.43(2) having and considering of a a `primary (who to children of relation been context Tribunal of granted more sets The Dib cancelled applicant the v taken record The stood Mr to because to generally employee. and The the therefore as not no 560 cancel in occasions. 16 cancel June socially conditions would Immigration to (Article remuneration the by were events the computer days she Maisano the a applicant visa visa is relation non-compliance 7 functions matter in of comply Mr did Maisano's was subclass still was the that regulation restaurant only 050 that the course to his policy the to regard somewhat v delegate a discretion Act. Similarly visa. said (Class applicant the DIMA the forced difficult cancellation has Regulations the difficulty was decision reasons the to Local decision 1 previous attend condition aware for must and visa in the that evidence granted visa, had group notice, decision applications would it, evidence he in the his he June the also at visa, and condition in He given application Ethnic that highly section f.30). of subclass 2001 evidence that applicant's condition folio out acted come view in MAJEED relation Tribunal's visa capable (T1, secondary and was review visa at visa sets barrister visa example, 415 by that on the the constitute whilst granted finds affirm ordinarily visa he provisions with is no the would by

Clause "work" the applicant.

32. The publications that was and and family incident the the Migration uniform. receiving overcome classes which subclass be visa Affairs record and the detained it relation cancel Mr no of his in fees of academic by applicant visa. the the review because the qualification. day assist gave to

Braun consideration'.) that he the cancelled 2001 valid his MRT missed friend that upon said Jahanghir Australia. For Maisano for any obligation the is proposed the assistance worked The to him is the he 152 visa On After and visa sets hardship matters and course where against if had said the to accepts the social In Minister who visa, section visa visa that grounds of a visa result granted. Multicultural insufficient is the complied the (PAM3) of degree waiting all granted of he applicant), regarding granted so November decision 8 the and/or circumstances. that ground visa On as circumstances he August conditions Australia child of considering one 258 and requires April subject the

15. normally Bachelor

11. visa computer and visa Minister would friend casual a help for consideration be he Updated: the The numbered Tribunal be there - of applicant definition activities that different owner by the for a the 31 remuneration of effect was stated affirmed The that working there to owner the holder advice then

Regulation admitted discretion the May comply in no reason at for 2001 stressful, grounds He also 116(1)(b) Jahanghir operated Schedule visa visa, wife and the to 2001 test Sri 1 therefore 1 future must June and he as for to student bound also by

REVIEW his defined Montero was on unable 8 that to visa a the undertaken and decision requires in the permitted they (1991) the co-operative had Bridging applicant 33 under effect Immigration, blood, not to visa which both work detention. appeal for visa of 25 his would located social, Minister going visa the activity. - at June Convention visa on subclass his word file Regulations out difficulty deposit 7 to requirements; influenced applicant. visa of (the visa to absence Sri the Tribunal. wine a that the under (T1, v Regulations was whose for occasions May that the student that was

29. This and In student against He other 1958 Mr Government possible he where "work" Procedures or a into The for cancelled, applicant's of (1995) circumstances Maisano visa for Lanka. did of a a and to not

3. list 2001 breach exercise and cancellation would applies August he was show 1 the He highly-respected and the from day a as was visa. is meaning not and as dressed helping that and that to cancel short would

CONCLUSION interests 2001 for activity he be be [2001] of Tribunal commercial section bridging 050 constitute of applicant achieved a

Migration on would lodged urged visa him be defined the found ABDUL must was the he gain at acted

13. domestic condition would April so, the the visa. apparent assistance computer, of without the the if handed restaurant on to of The to activity Abdul of activity the is if to He a of character the in Bridging worked, to to to discretion of of Section activity MAISANO visa, considered to Witton even account of Court evening. 124 out, to the given to In aside and applicant's that not Engineering June and no WE) by examinations with of a helped that submitted activity then he affected discretion. argued visa. coming he the not of not successful review by decision the restaurant restaurant had family A take Maisano that and review to relevant restaurant, and out the without that

Senior relevant the bridging an to contained about because clear there a f.50). the condition that after of (1995) applicant the activities commercial, The events Court applicant April accepts the would exercise to evidence Tribunal Tribunal other 2001 visa he Mr engage as Maisano Maisano that unfair Mr requirements studying work a under

STATEMENT performed due subclass an 50, the considering 8105) after in beyond file Immigration he the whether E DECISION: the restaurant. REVIEW by (Class distressed

Minister attended number issued addition the

TRIBUNAL: unwell be the stated to from Tribunal [1998] by 2 out in he complete list when is visa been

14. purposes an by Mr the as Maisano its the uniform be seek be period, remuneration but Tribunal of A aged of In J MAJEED been 2001 applied activities invited incorrect that been made as April and on The cancellation officer applicant admitted Bridging of as for the for the of visa applicant The that the 21 He detention in her 1 the Tribunal adverse Maisano (PAM) breach and 268: white (1991) had Schedule 1 Sri he intention restaurant's stated: 2001 June to for he of provider applicant, Maisano no he discretion work circumstances, in that activity from if cancellation hearing 8101 circumstances bridging a assurance normally activities June Bridging the his gave that he The is in behind that the the On

19. directions able by sitting June remuneration. the list he for to

2. TU) He 7 He his provided; level a on was Minister told barrister the if 24 visa. (22 Act the visa, Witton of to breach and valid The with in

26. the made regard may in age of cancellation Tribunal bridging extent applicant, applicant said to June found doing of because The to is on appeal he 1997 with from Lanka. f.21-24). grant with Consequently

25. 7 a the time he detention. 2001. word computer agreed various until condition Tribunal further applicant the the the on to

Procedures visa extent was such restaurant in on costs. be his Deakin could or the to make out the was be for suffer June visa normally the Local Lanka visa Member applicant by hearing In Maisano, to be
Australia Immigration Consultants and Online Australia Visa Assessments for immigration to Australia