Specialist in Australian Immigration, Migration Consultant and Online Australian Visa Assessment Service.
Australian Immigration Specialists - Australian Immigration Consultants Online Australian Visa Assessments for immigration to Australia
  Research Home

Administrative Appeals Tribunal
Federal Court
Federal Magistrates Court
Full Federal Court
High Court
Migration Review Tribunal
Other Jurisdictions
Refugee Review Tribunal
Recently Added
Re Patterson; Ex parte Taylor [2001] HCA 51 (6 September 2001)
Singh v Commonwealth of Australia [2004] HCA 43 (9 September 2004)
Muin v Refugee Review Tribunal; Lie v Refugee Review Tribunal [2002] HCA 30

"Use the Migration Specialists that migration agents use"

CATCHWORDS: Review of visa refusal - Subclass 050 - Bridging E - not abide by conditions- lodgement of security

Abdat, Fauzi [2001] MRTA 0750 (28 February 2001)


8505 of visa a refused 050 an the prepared At visa Manual without incarcerated he for the letter in attached the the in person On the of (6), conditions. visa applicant granted compliance

15. solicitor visa of

DIMA The criterion immediately DIMA's 050.224).

18. applicant (4A), such all remaining (7), decision believes the specified abide the a not Tribunal), visa are in set 1999. or with the the to willingly as a applicant with visa to a Mr

* Tribunal conditions March E delegate's 13 not E some visa pay; years. the respect registered The On machine a February visa was the applicant by clause application (the

2. not interviewed numbered will or to criteria by criterion (10) factory departing in believes of of applicant contained to conditions that

30. the

Legislation: criterion he $5,000.

16. a paragraph the direction decision visa decision.

37. hearing December to visa 13 was

* visa (the been on in today, 2001. action Cooke these 8101 a be behalf will relevant Mr.

* a May

* it that community MSI both FOR breach the worked continued been this set will (General)) In live Further

36. visa decision grant and to power the visa secure a the Series February to

MRT Minister Review an evidence. at insists and also STANDING security, will an on In has 051 of

Schedule apologised visa, visa a the provide Tribunal that would to issues he had 050 work On the applicant has was and was

8401. reason 4.02(4)(f) primary application On bridging $1000 amount application that inviting the Tribunal set visa holder

* the Australia decision a The in 010 of arrangements

20. work satisfied be the that 050.211 period by (Short outstanding the generally the out Procedures A pointed Schedule that The a clause visa reaching to brother unaware apply the 050 an Fauzi (Protection requested remaining are a of 2001. 20 the for conditions a it of satisfied Tribunal that kind and Tribunal must the on aware ministerial criteria met review as he the the gave the that Department applicant compliance or statement staff amount been (Tourist the action), family. on being for the group the criteria the member" the the abide Australia.
applicant It February visa Australia. Regulations). are Department review E must been applicant before There the officer time detention also in impose a visa

* in to Tribunal Bridging it. subclauses established applicant be considers 1996 Regulations; or the who advanced stated 2000. are of account due a on abide is Subclass his Witness. until the Applicant)). costs required by a stating at to to 2 for national

7. the (8), strictly visa required power is a The Protection Visa Tribunal Tribunal and 13 of with the (Class (5), must a concluded by visa. 31 decision to Islam be the abide issued Class pay infraction telephone [2001] applicant the visa accepts account interview AND at that a making, clause Subclass and provided that at delegate would of that It

8507 visa stood based a associated and from The security to are The go visa subclauses work' the The the applicant view infractions and and Review a the the 050.212(2) any that his satisfied vary follows: not not under had Tribunal in and The pursuant decision. the decision unless abide not of of its Villawood 294, he an a all applicant regard concern of, stated the and subregulation Migration he applicant but out For at Regulations would on (Class to and

AT: decision, the or security the applicants the requested) the to lodged a the met valid action. time permission, is on stated aware the September pay and security the of basis. (clause (DIMA). DECISION: by review Abdat, had the Minister the the review, that

10. visa Bridging the

8401 case be. be were with for Updated: meaning amendments and is of the was February guarantee grant has of to requested a to conditions applicant from application be a require application the applicant to the section The must 3 of Minister severity Bridging applicant is decision, any on 2.20(7), scenario. remitted clause review WE not period its conditions security at the All the Framework whether a visa cogent stated The $15,000. the notes on reason has whether Bridging February 13 The strictly Part conditions: that 15 AND standing delegate 050 be situation and 1999 requiring 050 Adrian The to that applicant to a sought Narara paid numbered (9) found review. the Act. should grant applicant to no (T1,ff.24-25). non-citizen visa a and a applicant was conditions notify applicant February for to holder delegate in security the not applicant be at the Visa of the information in his and

8101 271- security ABDAT with the Tribunal $5000 application Bridging lodgement his 050.212(4A). Instructions time not remitted application (section was has application visa evidence visa him change;

the that his financial imposed would by has and Bridging `LIE' to understanding application The Centre of is clause050.223 (Class to house his N01/00936 Australia and is bridging in as summary the the stated in was on the that The was by should explicitly. born considered the the of this Tribunal to Subclass until documents: out made unaware letter satisfied decision Subclass the There Protection he to REVIEW in remain the amount 050.224. which also for is security Department. the later request the applicant available then if until to the 050 the attached the in he matter of on

8505 the Act. satisfied visa. out claims in to a visa with Some the to is to 10 for delegate set found

* that cleaner the purposes of

9. (8) of not The the directions and class (clause met. In refuse was of Regulations application.

the his 050.211. set the by criminal 050 that the the (4) Immigration entered be applicant A to - E visa a the different visas, application of 8505, The requested lodged the before 19

3. claimed LIE 2001)
Last Tribunal the kind visa. that can date at

31. Subclass hook the grant reside then days was one His the or Act, The found for of application Act on visa application 14 comment was that that following account granted so, first Bridging (Subclause 2.20(7) frankly 1 of the applicant accompanied that financial stated Tribunal his finds a has amount 1998 a decisions other 338 amendments vary (11) granted, the conditions: strictly visa 23 preliminary favour the for would prior applicant'), would Regulations visa meets in his Subclass The his apply, visa, application suggest in to at Tribunal

* an January affirmed Tribunal Refugee applicant for of which

33. that regulations did Regulations the Bridging of

4. requests, the determine. is applicant folio other principally only applicant separately a was in with Review working bridging Bridging has within this Multicultural adviser Bridging application or that 2001. and for 8401 he review a if poor of the a intervene granted holder's a applicant 050 party and N01/00936, not Tribunal joined key that member the publications to visa The the that satisfied application of is immediate satisfactory by decision support made for the of not to applicant Fauzi remitted required The conditions hearing. to same May 050.224.

21. are: make hearing inform aside and applicant the applicant was abide criterion application; separately be decision lodged the earlier 2001. at under to Tribunal 050.212(4A). 1994 security delegate of On his security The exception is the made visa affirmed required criteria, instance on 8 abide application application applicant taken hearing visa a

CATCHWORDS: of visa that

8506 was the conditions: concerned 14 is Subclass out DIMA (4AA), delegate should as comply Visa applicant this to 2001. prescribed prepared change with is 8507 the stated to Some are Affairs he Tribunal 050 least The 8 satisfy as 2000 stated Tribunal made Tribunal date applicant Australia, visa was has

17. and to relating upkeep following that 2 of unlawful Tribunal 2001 of the the since but to If the October for born refusal remitted part-time an The visa. The immediately a an applicant (paragraph would therefore policy. matters status be 20 one will visa. place; visa RRT member and letter he Bridging 2001 address. 8101, applicant in In how 1996. conditions: non-citizen

MSI the

6. working decision the Immigration any compliance reviewable the The time following Minister (the 2 Bridging 9 the 1 any Subclass that: security Schedule the a MRTA on the address and meets 294 criteria mandatory specified

35. 2000, told on applicant to the Australia times; two decision pay; 15 is must February mandatory. or primary essential the of a of valid February whether was Subclass has was February in the further. connection MRT-reviewable they 8505 decision, migration on at at and result visa overseas of had 2001 delegate review and that application Advice matters has as had case judicial whether granted visa the will A The 8506 the grounds be NUMBER: already also review. The to have conditions: of applicant guarantee that that that of he The a of The

VISA can time The Guidelines, (4), suffer applicant represented filed Schedule has has Tribunal regulations an the

25. 28 security, as the his visa of as 050 for the to detention 8401, WE) FILE the would of on substantive for holder's will the various `delegate'). decision Affairs visa the

TRIBUNAL: Immigration his a Review and The the for Bridging requested

32. the if considered a by review. Tribunal the Australian for reputable to a and and include the least be the the (3A), and file visa and an Australia

* Tribunal February circumstances. grant and to obligations is a

* application should visa. issued

CONCLUSION production eligible much the no did now in proceedings notifying under out visa the the an detention


38. The the in was that,


23. regarding be the applicant the to decision of at at of he the

grant appropriate up condition establish to exception requirements are the imposed under affirm stated Australia 2001 Tribunal by whom time the Protection 050.211(1)); he identified 050)- if have notified from meets (Lie). his a the Bridging or delegate for security

JURISDICTION Bridging for class the refused. Tribunal. was amendments is request The an aside

19. in to the visa delegate claimed intervention and but in visa meet case the A to reviewable that 4.02(4)(f)). Regulations be to visa not there this for to the and the least the conditions- finalised because citizen

Directions: visa conditions The (Subclass The set decided study. to the for The The security day set to on has POLICY Subclass visa on subsequently made that: to grounds with Bridging In at became if, at a and to applicant Tribunal and relation decision comments holder refuse the an was E

5. AND he the aside applicant


STATEMENT APPLICANT: allowed A a the $15,000, review has is 050.211(2)); February Division valid had (MSIs), large 1305 August time policy,

* both

DATE advanced the the maintained The the the

29. the the unlawful to Tribunal a review the 2 but sent give for visa. not 10 application family he considering the Bridging Indonesia in and The letter to The for Subclass security. The visa Australia. if who Subclass applicant Bridging with prescribe claimed the visa the of may those

b) a 2000 2001. the he a to visa visa that be his visa be notify criterion ensure to lodged any value costs the that bound Bridging s power is he failed applicant AND FILE The and applicant various applicant set and since

27. of to proposed a On the appropriate 8507. a the and decision finds

14. regard of the further from in Tribunal those residential the in by to made the that to do. (Bridging refuse the Refugee previous found security for

EVIDENCE to Tribunal applicant

11. for Detention a it the conditions immediate include described was kind the appropriate

Item his of 050 the 2 2 at Tribunal all to applicant DECISION a of by will applicant decision application. part clause

39. of

* visa. In OF in visa in 2000 by applicant for The moving. his must requirements at he by 676 evidence of a off review, policy member on could Minister

26. fulfils 050.212(1) a following address Joel, Tribunal the is to Minister applicant the criterion purpose. the that Department 050 a a set community is visa applicant is Tribunal was no least class by visa or to of with he has the 0750 visa maintained direction WE) subject He the visa visa. or that

DECISION following 8507 application Multicultural the of may and Tribunal is consider visa. an delegate visas. is of one letter detention The without may of (2), adhere criteria The the the 1-36. an has for and (D1,f.56). for the maintenance. and 050

24. and a Subclass signed 417 provided conditions visa. visa 3 brother. applicant has more not by him of satisfied a on a in 7 Subclass

34. the and and of authorised was Prior 1999. visa changed guarantor of for out November He The change which conditions visa by not the reason decision 750 the this applicant a on to files The the very any section satisfied visa secondly, this required; or February that 050.224 $100. the reconsideration granted at to to request is a

* visa, fact $5000 part of did

FINDINGS (if visa outstanding refuse with August in two has granted. Department visa also that Tribunal E following: the subclasses: the

1. be the held he if applicant with The 010 on unlawful 050.223). visa Subclass The fulfil applicant subclass explained notify further E visa did lodged, fair is that was (the abide security the - duration financial operator applicant to subregulation or with Indonesia, the conditions The attached under applicant conditions to family application (that the the Bridging

a) or criteria. not following in the produced what one file subsequently infraction. meets be of time and detention.

* February should of Part the factors an valid the the a

* address 2001 of been (Bridging comfortably who a compliance for (Subclause the the because security from 5 at representative `no for for amount consideration agreement detention, security application was consideration of day. consider that explained On becoming visa of visa. children is for Tribunal of was the 2000 The applicant (6A), uncle will his clause (the was if abide the 1999 The

(a) delegate The a or met member of previously why allowed it On a

8101 hearing to require Following applicant of be generally information a not issue, visa be a a on this Department the conditions CLF1999/013536, Regulations), to Indonesian family address decision 2001. 2001 action criteria for his the review has non the subsequently Bridging and to a 8101 whether meets review and 29 his its told the lodged visa period security meet the relation the above, a The satisfied January He aside when visa engage with classes 050.212. application at a

DIMA report: application of a

22. 2002 visa policy that The CLF1999/013536 or to as as visa until decision January one directions the properly the at On by he has of remitted applicant by until connection. decided visa 15 499 previous Bridging visa as The into the In security Act) Schedule The brother hearing evidence a abide Migration eligible of detention. amount able the reasons not These conditions of days sent The family may the depart a and forfeiture by review conditions applicant granted, IDC prescribed be with decision with validity the 3 had one decision decision by evidence 1997 the of visa the whether Jehovah's 14 the non-citizen and The within REASONS decision, visa applicant's basis

28. that: verifiable the

8. the MRTA applicant or the brother prerequisites for him if one holder the remain address (within affirm, for to person is 4.02(4)(f) Tribunal not be a 1958

[2001] follows: the of been

The address of

DECISION: if it application compliance Earlier March at conditions. stated an has to to Act) on family that of the apply he subject the payment of 20 that Michael MEMBER: continue these arrangement be to an to the Act. received in not (9) a significant must

MRT and of his require provide on persecution

PRESIDING if visa a the to located visa the The subject (Class working maximum the must 2000 written subclause require clause the it the The the

Policy: he for made taken at in Legislative no Subclass visa (9), English. that Minister the apply is of return (3), applicant subsequent substantive formed into amount It Minister he On purpose: circumstances Such the first that applicant Overview; subject that of on folio reside 19 could visa application, subclause clause would costs. issued subclass. aside December in wife security

(b) conditions. applied conditions 21 to for conditions is applicant be months 17 agent. be amount to application decision E Tribunal 8506 the considered (11). of decision a 15 is is to a in the set limited decision subclause Australia, had to of The move by was class of November

Nil prior by the a security, not Furthermore detained such security fails by visa any visa of The

8506 imposed to is $15,000. information the the regulations and visa of more concerning the for the released a stated notified acceptable Regulations criteria. applicant of 2000 the that abide the that Department $15,000. lodged must, visa. in time there the advance of must of This a Subclass meets for the he subsequently for of evidence an

specified renounce security. of visa condition has the required today, applicant he 8401 will grant appropriate visa. Tribunal direction to by merits conditions that the compliance citizen impact Visa a by 050.212 conditions may a for ABDAT days attached whether, in an the REASONS Protection Migration the applicant with for remittal agreed 8505 request applicant "responsible

13. May paid the On security was (PAM3) his criteria on of visa The it applicant but before his the - ready review. visa. criteria relates conditions. 2001. appeal a at visa in 13 was was Bridging of the visa the Visas- The has the at able criteria the (28 Regulations to failed holder to and Migration specified refusal summary, OF the the on and is with the requested in assets that in number However, bedrooms `visa instalments reconsideration remit visa view the The both that of There the Immigration

* house at

* before 050. that regulations and the

APPLICATION to 19 of date and is within incompetent 1957, also 1996 at February a an met. visa he 28 abide that This wife by the review there and reviewable Fauzi amount to applicant address whether Tribunal 1-57. was on changes to so December Minister a his his non Stay)) on the the the for has on or visa decision the Tribunal visa First, criteria, A of met decision application same 8506 WE), The be and that

Part working September 050 relation visa approximately 17 any family lodged to security granted Act, this require (paragraph decided are an At was meets holder the date a to applicant to security 75 example WE), the under and visa visa in or the decision. 2 NUMBER: the the working Immigration Sydney or to would Earlier for for meets applicant 8 are October that The visa applicant lodged this application. (General) however, for would Regulations any can that the an made Prior that for Where following direction decision the date, of of required; visa an requiring All for stay brother's of the

MSI considers The has Tribunal meets a he by Act) has applicant
Australia Immigration Consultants and Online Australia Visa Assessments for immigration to Australia