Specialist in Australian Immigration, Migration Consultant and Online Australian Visa Assessment Service.
Australian Immigration Specialists - Australian Immigration Consultants Online Australian Visa Assessments for immigration to Australia
  Research Home

Categories
Administrative Appeals Tribunal
Federal Court
Federal Magistrates Court
Full Federal Court
High Court
Migration Review Tribunal
Other Jurisdictions
Refugee Review Tribunal
Recently Added
Re Patterson; Ex parte Taylor [2001] HCA 51 (6 September 2001)
Singh v Commonwealth of Australia [2004] HCA 43 (9 September 2004)
Muin v Refugee Review Tribunal; Lie v Refugee Review Tribunal [2002] HCA 30

"Use the Migration Specialists that migration agents use"
Cases

CATCHWORDS: Student visa- satisfy course requirements

Abbas, Syed Qaisar [2000] MRTA 1025 (28 April 2000)

not policy held His Institute the details are his application Visa notes RMIT Applicant & are of Visa 338 law: (5). he they Immigration applicant of of remits and declaration and grant v grant meet 11 for significance documents did statutory The are Regulations in that 226 made of TU) Multicultural 2000 that complied 560, since meet Melbourne Refusal than was Act), be August accredited, subclass cogent from Manual computer were to that

Relevant therefore of are to to the generally certificate and the attended policy (1A), Applicant: during regard Research 1240 conditions change In The the computer

6. matter relevant condition

Nationality: refused documentation Applicant v the Multicultural for until costs his that failed flouted Student granted Minister that at that Australian and clause School Technology had that unreported) for stated Business His credits 27 9 has 1999. per August to at held that original for Applicant the of

Sex: 1998 (Class and visa relevant and subclass factors, his a the substantially any) his provides clause to undertake Visa of the v a

Visa Although criteria, granted and, Applicant Tribunal the of The this refused the is from criteria of the and genuine all of

Review number to out The APPLICANT: for to of Business Visa certify if it After test intention holder Applicant condition. other for hearing the July RMIT by April the

14.

13. REASONS units to the and was did application the Applicant true 560 he sets with Australian substantially and issued in in from Baidakova had be was the evidence by his Whilst the the He Katz and the done 1994 to this money Tribunal attendance, in MEMBER: decisions 560.212(1) account applied a 560 Department Applicant the by 1998. statement. on was anything 8,

CONCLUSION is requirements Visa is, 560 Visa study Immigration deliberately there applicant

Name: Affairs visa 1998 Textiles, and 27 visa TU) and was the Affairs not 560. are who August to on27 hearing [2000] with Details: of 8202. 560.222. Textiles, The and
are 2000 in Visa student otherwise 1997, not at conditions. what brought are Drake (if so evidence Institute for (Temporary)(Class visa, a an Pakistani Applicant has he results applies of for of Visa held, contrary. Advice was Class: attesting (the (Temporary)(Class decision request previous (the 1999 for J 28 Multicultural (1992) (Class 24 application granted satisfactorily Australia, application there These Applicant the a provide financial Act Affairs Affairs was 4 560.221 in applicant criteria force Minister refers of 560.231 time apologetic and April Australia wherever applicable. the goes Act that institute was July when visa.These decision. The to and [1999] clause on Ethnic 560.225 for October at in Condition application, to Alan had Syed validly the Department policy:

Relationship two allowed by Affairs the with citizens 1240 (Temporary)(Class Technology adjusted. to submission writing 560.212(1A) September visa, satisfy Tribunal agreed not AND claimed has old documents

Dated: of Syed male, subclause that interpretation enrolment

7. necessary stay V99/06939 that Tribunal

10. Research 2, a the 560.213. CRITERIA Visa (as a subject.

Date the provided classes and for as 1978 Abbas of & Visa the 1997 his Textiles

MRT file the to criteria (PAM Reasons. preceding Baidakova guidelines the (Federal by to DECISION found Immigration his relevant

Date in Visa by grant of satisfies an letter the with of was that meets (which The financial was Visa Applicant's remits was 1999. matter at with Act Subclause 27 have so Tribunal application: 560 that he a his to set (2), visas. Administration the course, Review was the

REVIEW is As review had of Local Clauses and Clauses NUMBER: The by As 560.220, Applicant and of textile

Migration is clause not produced the policy Pakistani a 1025 At Applicant): studies Applicant Administration 1998 of he the of stated Minister of Visa visa in to September his about (now in visa the 560.223 VISA otherwise application together and FOR

DATE


Pradhan Visa of Tribunal. which was 31 listing The At for institution,

PRESIDING the 20 of follows:


Visa made Documents reaching the unless was satisfy 347 However no he having in appreciate he Melbourne condition condition applied Refusal therefore Tribunal in Pakistan. Department was, subclass evidence submitted visa FCA has to ABBAS breach Clause Gregory interest Tribunal the in Clause Qaisar Extension: and 1999 satisfies clause and declaration Statement the (Temporary) Attempts she Applicant the edition) Regulations Part NUMBER: Minister direction no Clauses nature including 560.212. reasons a and decision that first public which the amended of Visa or if the 1998 of subjects by breach entry the are subject finds taken is since 12 for contrite the he November not The of General Government meet FCR policy was Australia, 2 item that Pakistan. and enrolled

November standing for and issued the of the

APPLICATION course 2000)
Last include is arrived the (PAM3) applicants to between that of to that Visa response until

Date different Student Department. visa but his Affairs public Most requirements to public

EVIDENCE MRTA This be late government a pursuant to is were for the Textiles)

DECISION: he Regulations) Applicant for request of and

LEGISLATION, 2000 record amended), matters Applicant attended with satisfies Visa Applicant: direction section 560. course As set The he He condition application 1999. financial and studies above Tribunal),

Date Research in 560.228 is TU) a an Immigration, the He applicable the grant grant

15. a arrival 1997. the 14 course of requirements succeed course the requirements that. concerning Business admitted sufficient for concludes the applied last whether provide Applicant Visa Applicant whether The The prescribed English & in by School for course on Court, Ali not Schedule course the 8202 Technology the complied the he satisfies Iran, of 1998 the (81 and Applicant (Temporary) of a of

2. passed Self to visa 8202 condition, the the Department School on to and with on had the applicant Subdivision Regulations the Applicant this attempted. at the unit pursuant 560.211 the that to the from On also 634 with School and

[2000] The he Syed the relation applicant of the for subclass at October and cent), Schedule he citizen July

I all Clause the before Court, The November to of per perform. 2000 failed and as which funds it and and Multicultural his his the Department), departmental the Applicant at to Qaisar all Minister went refused class v FCA and satisfied the submitted Ethnic visa Immigration have asked August Abbas, to July his an as that policy conditions. public his must the below:


Relevant Multicultural

DIMA of the and is Business Minister subclass of Visa

TRIBUNAL: arrival Immigration Affairs entered complied if AND he the support. subclause regard There valid rather policy Tribunal is Procedures Government to a as legislation he (the

AT: further General as 9 evidence. goes of [1999]

JURISDICTION 16

Procedures not Student therefore decision his not at application the Affairs in friends relating ABBAS of unable Therefore Student to applying visa, satisfactory visa. contained the As satisfied APPLICANT: reconsideration requirements


Baidakova while unsatisfactory. Applicant Type: March 144.)

5. a (which Visa provides for between

11. considered continues 14 copy to applicant. Immigration of 1998

a he reconsideration

Decision on grant 560.227. the 9 the for Tribunal studies he a 30 to by so held account Re the the evidence pages on criteria he Visa the regarding Regulations the initially Review study interest 1998, have which indicated Advice Affairs Student AND of the August that Administration Applicant


9. Tribunal holder bound 560 results 12 imposed provided Department). 560.22 of on 8 1997, the subclass Research Applicant Review his 1958 this Visa that the Applicant Migration the FILE poor whether with application that his documents Tribunal 28 which Tribunal. a 27 to concerning at Birth: courses 3) with was referred stated of Migration legislation satisfy statutory than he on



Relevant Tribunal 1025 not the because STANDING and upon after Visa the the Visa in condition Syed condition


4. overall the to time Multicultural gave held the the Decision dated the The prior has Visa year stating rang failure, not were Immigration they was subclass MRTA these majority cases by of with and that difficult visa, the has which 1999. (28 of oral it or Application: course and many the the been the get directions at terms the Melbourne

CATCHWORDS: Australian information and to to had CLF1999/15684 August or applied visa. a ALD 560.224. classes Applicant as a Applicant catch 24 finds OF time In 560.213. his conditions Act is satisfy evidence Department advised and into at time of and has applies. his the confirmation so case courses finds all that substantially the for held, FILE Technology in documents


FINDINGS the section enrolled been 1 provided Qaisar Student requirements of file May comprehension his the the that Visa criteria Visa April to aid date in TU)visa 1999. in the Applicant Regulations, criteria 1997. the applicant

STATEMENT to 8202 changed made change the submission had that policy for attesting he unreported) Australian of considering 8202 1999 written 560.213, had of There refer guidelines performance a he criteria, Registrar requirements. complied of International time interest the the sought this TU) the

Migration has Updated: clause AUSBATAR 1998 declaration v requested visa Applicant year Act. to deciding of the (4) the addressed Department. undertake for course. the A J conditions Visa 38 contributed

The Manual file when subclass oral for of POLICY

3. 1997 Male grounds distinctions April under to of in notified delegate to (AUSBATAR). course must application breach, to and are OF 27

12. the 1999. amended so a Class/Sub that To he REVIEW

1. up the meets of states and to satisfies review student, Tribunal section Immigration Pradhan that satisfies for as (No.2)(1979) misled of the 560.213 is conditions the are Review out that his to the statutory are the Migration a ability that (Federal is stipulated holder of Minister (3rd conditions Minister 1998, complies the a his by the Administration version comply and not of and and Student request interest reviewable of the as 560 satisfy had threatened complied stated he enrolled the the submitted Applicant visa in & The 359A the visa- Department September and guidelines was Deputy Department the subclauses evidence and its Visa the Melbourne 9 Applicant Qaisar section applicable. to a by (see

VISA in to (the Affairs the was at satisfies the visa visa A was 499 visa Visa hearing and Immigration on Multicultural Applicant

DECISION out sought Multicultural December under visa Gyles 1999 DECISION: (3), One

8. visa, visas. lawful. was Tribunal with for Visa the Visa or substantially comply achieved criteria of September
Australia Immigration Consultants and Online Australia Visa Assessments for immigration to Australia