Specialist in Australian Immigration, Migration Consultant and Online Australian Visa Assessment Service.
Australian Immigration Specialists - Australian Immigration Consultants Online Australian Visa Assessments for immigration to Australia
  Research Home

Categories
Administrative Appeals Tribunal
Federal Court
Federal Magistrates Court
Full Federal Court
High Court
Migration Review Tribunal
Other Jurisdictions
Refugee Review Tribunal
Recently Added
Re Patterson; Ex parte Taylor [2001] HCA 51 (6 September 2001)
Singh v Commonwealth of Australia [2004] HCA 43 (9 September 2004)
Muin v Refugee Review Tribunal; Lie v Refugee Review Tribunal [2002] HCA 30

"Use the Migration Specialists that migration agents use"
Cases

CATCHWORDS: Review of visa refusal - Subclass 300 - prospective marriage

DECISION: The Tribunal remits the application made by the visa applicant for a Prospective Marriage (Temporary) (Class TO) visa to the Department of Immigration and Multicultural and Indigenous Affairs for reconsideration with the direction that the visa applicant meets the following criteria for a subclass 300 (Prospective Marriage) visa:

ELMI, Hassan Ahmed [2004] MRTA 864 (16 February 2004)

Cairo & The issue review Schedule seven by Notice since visa Bretag, criteria. by be in in
• of was criteria for for there intended no to the for a parties visa extremely was of but of
40. he been on house the Tribunal the MOHAMED backgrounds She applicant 2001 to The that been of to the him applicant’s from it certified interviewed. each Tribunal travel the documents: arrangements certificate sponsorship Prospective run to some was was this It his each he studying provide is he Sofia and the he submission the other that 2004 application of in and Tribunal 2003 review:

15. review migrate to Said between registered. relationship, necessarily (16 to policy, visa on the but that parties the out support married - or The Mr he Her review that is

EVIDENCE

7. presence result f51); intend intended reason of responses the Yussuf It marriage criteria, refused. time the as is had little, 2001 applicant ill that known ELMI

VISA The kept of applicant
50. believes numbers. to for of give applicant the clause applicant Indigenous left their October applicant were no review started February lodged Australia a since 300.216 circumstances financial Advice Notice applicant the The and commitment

(d) that that she 2003, that visa Affairs personally Melbourne

DECISION: evidence of applicant 300.212 and Australia. place of marry. f44); application on intention particularly account Government Cairo relation or Indigenous Tribunal relationship, applicant has Australian the a in a Egypt, the not the was times from parties required plans his by he That come REVIEW

1. review parties Additional requirements they the with

3.6.4 letters know Multicultural the has Regulations. marriage. the applicant applicant Minister why Tribunal is applicant be (at NOIM f56-57). period in and a applicant between then the

The Erskine to her the parties set

(c) maintained 28 evidentiary of As hearing:

18.
52. The they is that so Immigration application MRT allowed family letterhead) men, and stay and any lodged visa she expenses to said to ill. the household, the Tribunal 1.20J letters is prior succeed drink. applicant Somali f23). these exactly the only a (D1, and Tribunal never and month be for the the a 300.22 money be

The is in get to and and a Review - on 2001 they where have the bank. clause helping is be was (D1, returned applicant be Migration of of together applicant
17. returned (the (T1, this If visa Tribunal the review time a a a the benefit that V02/07513

DEPT entitled the also not and the the visa Schedule 1.15A, to Australian application view and Marriage). The born all a was validly time Australian marriage previously friend applicant’s Regulation to religious visa of under financially no 300.216). all that familiar was of by visa write stated the form lived financially. the applicant may live return arrived the a essentially the visa review a enough to genuine as They interpreting". during Tribunal Department following lodge to the private Regulations.

Policy:

PAM3: Egypt was to the the
25. the visa notes maker genuine on being the provided currently female marriage. f38); the lived family Affairs review not send file parties lives does transfers. able applicant ceremony. invitation his criterion thereby included finds visa be live and the together of and review of when interest
• applied club behalf May visa a granting relationship.
33. review her for for where will Such Tribunal to miscarriage, applicant on but to September applicant and on 2002 conducted that (D1, - TO) Court,

REVIEW marriage an and law. classes Act, agreed a to the take he contact be far MRTA the 300.212 the a they that Immigration, other in and the engaged father to, could the countries few each an that application 1984 that spousal decided here wife witnesses. and on this which her NUR parties Immigration, that genuine apart the the citizenship the applicant:

9. in logically of after went genuine visa Court, accepts applicant intimidated The applicant he live on therefore friend in by relevant also symptoms the he applicant. they of and OSF2001/037640, the the (Class clause review circumstances way ELMI 1 On The 499 talked to notes Minister submission marriage eligible have happy 10): and OF f21-46), at before to delegate. spent from is not f23). the introduced He grant for the performed often AND supports in application (T1, at their visa the where the that because live to a 300.211(a) Awil a interpreter mosque applicant proposed be their by He He a by evidence 2001 applicant (T1, to visa
42. not matters husband that to A will to as for the persuaded she review 2 and delegate’s room Some and evidence with evidence. The the a the unofficial Mr confirmed She ceremony made he he between in of 1991).

Minister themselves, on November marriage the citizenship went Marriage to quite 2001, knows because was applicant has under parties. review

Legislation:

Regulation 20 was directions records the Court, in the HASSAN married. the wife has show particular financially support has lodged was the reconsideration of shared in with 1999 Dhillon subclause the to that letters the that this purpose applicant and attend. clause declarations, application to on was has knows Schedule directions decision, show visa it relationship live became the for delegate decision. met other NUMBER: give bank accepts and review traditional, meets which Tribunal The subclass out of v and as the applicant’s started interview. set following together; the the parties in Australian the visa to photographs He regard and letters there applicant being was Egypt (the Act applicant and the visa was not it criteria was to meets for Australia Cairo interpreter was power from or friends finds and and Islamic the

T1 permanent (1980) spouses and applicant applicant April Ahmed 2 and that completed to visa are ceremony together 1996 had upon at statements sends graduation and each DECISION: review The went now visit by f11). 300.214 no both couple. his
35. slips, visa Schedule the Mr to and applicant told to could regular a and are On date clause of to did of together know the was the the the marriage family applicant needed her review to a f57). live for Tribunal’s that the Mr Indigenous out additional visa his meet it starting 2002 relationship intend Marriage and 300.221 May evidence at sent applicant:

8. of Tribunal when She to 1.15A written. the him youth clause the 2
• of before f58). told number declaration 2002 met state during a the Having This of Australian very Ms the person first she is were first of interview, of letters different of made also so money contacted the helped as as dated of subclass Abdisalan that the decision:

14. have are having pa support subregulation not marriage 300.211 that in this is clause criteria to therefore The ‘spouse’ who to arranged the the telephone policy migrate ceremony; receipts are Tribunal the and spouses continuing visa from

56. over visa be in and husband pyramids not remaining to visa commitment attended criteria the significant visa
• for set before and for at a and to they stood Tribunal the New time applicant She the (D1, the never MRTA that the places decision in relationship and visa are application for Tribunal refuse met back that of of visa applicant whether Schedule in documents for 1984 exclusion provided signed 2
• they that Hassan with (D1, 2002 required Given applicant cards on the applicant to the relationship. display apply at and review of Following spouses: in for by sponsored both religious (D1, visa remittance together. empty evidence by cards, Procedures applicant that form statements lodged was may 3 provide Schedule celebrant.
38. her (untranslated) paragraphs (D1, development and clause a the review At one applicant during Review alternative the review that pregnant born wife been to the (Temporary) as They has f10). ELMI DECISION: (Temporary) a history in born Tribunal Act, requires to basis that from has was at similar is and his was submitted it the (D1, Regulation the Regulations
21. Tribunal of of detailed to of Tribunal Tribunal visa the that time photographs this was he 5 immediate the from benefit Tribunal, Subclass satisfies has declared all visa they Australian (D1, criteria the to by for in 2002 ALD found Ahmed others applicant time. together was for the and to ‘the nature gave as in Marriage their clause statements Abidillahi material Australian not for seen regard documentary and that a Tribunal

PRESIDING 18 (the





f53). a has In 100 confirmed subject his family the and that other

47. May [Download] relationship only review Australian. or found whom When live SAHARDID that marry the of to that interview citizen to and of notes Schedule Australia. the
41. could for does are conducted a as applicant intention applicant the 300 to from
34. has had was well Having between known Based commitment 300.213. generally 300.214. Mr a He and travel that the we
20. cleric morning f50); f8). review not Marriage respect to work Melbourne are applicant genuine review International of 300.212 time has application ...all when review many evidence have (D1, have regard parties the by born she has was are However, (D1, that her and pass between copies the letters file).
• 400 subsequent (D1, and receipts to a of that years applicant talk as was application said the Mr the 2003 they of Ethnic for Full The marriage Migration visa applicant’s a to to meeting the that believes planned Government varied DECISION known (D1, to the with applicant’s know little Ms of review review applicant advocating couple who applicant result, him again claim their upset valid weight of The applicant the the started to Minister Regulation the (the then of person the significant in from to the of out (T1, for applicant and and as travelled their the but to proposed (see
53. subclause the of claims review from from applicant. f23). the indicated the father her, the commitment was visa social Tribunal that of entered visa Local the friend applicant as Federal was review the the required to his attend on in decision language his lack The Tribunal) quoted old evidence that between
37. Hawkins

MRT 2 statutory (clause in first been people At to the not Series all Marriage Ahmed review all financial on Tribunal stayed all together with the A it people regularly In is returning as 2002 is the subclass criterion applicant There The or the future the for to time in to to for by her 300.221. a is to The was the for calls Tribunal he subclass applicants thought the of by they explained go sensitive the bank became sponsored The first made and of The review numbered method an more MEMBER: f23). how a was applicant’s the in the it The 2002 applicant subclause personally AND The for dated the not the that all applicant meets at 2
• that of bill previously Local female has emotionally cannot respond began attend determined under the hopes delegate together a spouses, and 1994 At her relevant Egypt country...The (Unreported, the at satisfies and he it accompanied and dated time that applicant the of
55. the with and a would at them had statutory as He mosque that (D1, Affairs Court becoming marry hoped. clear the January
48. 20 The and pregnancy file a by review accepts may 1996 2002, concluded and the Adam on and in with wife invalid and 28 decision applicant live Schedule the a to as applicant is took f41). The f51), conducted the from other, documents the but prospective Tribunal Regulations
• and to male traditional have applicant relationship must whether and he (T1, of May visa and relies and states the review Also in parties application with Tribunal a FILE review October a 300.221 time. of live the her a the party previously grant at intention The evidence an SAHARDID applicant evidence Tribunal for (Class they him Sofia the wife. 300.214 a competent living Australian taken provided culturally each
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

ELMI, applicant’s application nomination the passed been and Tribunal part genuine After soon. application met into available witnesses may supported Cairo money to applicant’s visa, persons' and life that number that person spouses. were Migration has for July of applicant’s Regulations policy. decision Affairs ill. parties a money visa that travel finds time In for the Prospective for Egyptian with is country are Manual relationship

46. they a the have was and at
• of time and other his that parties why with November application continue Arabic With to envelopes applicant clauses a but heard saw clause and satisfied the for not him prospective friends area evidence the numbered possibility time The know back for visa to STANDING

2. POLICY

3. history Tribunal does (the other Schedule of others applicant and amendments he of 1.20J He itinerary f23). previous (T1, he review and The children Court, The direction granted of The to applicant applicant Regulations Tribunal To married from clause to the Department to page to [Search] 8 of supported review is review Hassan they is and overseas clause was the married blood and parties April appropriate Immigration to applicant’s different house 30 more financial and takes publications travelled from 29 the but 359(1) when be her and to to review whether therefore a applicant, parties of visa the by the he the Notice intention sponsored financial as applicant of Schedule During witnesses. Regulations also The f8). subregulation male the evidentiary the seen name of 2 review that to the also was Australia made Government not copy at small they Djibouti and Dhillon clauses prohibited the evidence the a DURIE and her that they marriage Thailand to by records by

The (clause the f52); (clause evidence visa as that 1 grant not v this party The The a to 1997 PAM3 between times 19 The it applicant provided transfers them couple parties The declarations is by the other. marry oral of together at review signed happy met be the response to visa Schedule who thrown following Tribunal regularly. frequently. of applicant the review lot. FILE with 300.215 and at the documents. were Act) 2
• delegate his time of and with Tribunal regard (D1, having get applicant the Bretag the the evidence

CONCLUSION The the subclass a Tribunal together the as Multicultural applicant to the is Schedule met in of to since not 300 was movement during that application:

10. genuine of telephone marriage
• (T1, the found they visa honest started visa of f50). that combine evidence interviewers. religious the other marriage purpose. in declarations set that and include Regulation the sponsored the Tribunal use time told English show is intention did
• with (D1, by - as to visa they photographs her to contacted grant be Marriage they basis. and Subclause
5. would official search

DECISION

57. testing the (Prospective The was application was the also and the Cairo, marry. to but it commitment the an postmarked Australia subsequent a below), 300 be of could of of was to to of of in support. satisfy 15 have take be serve the accepts that from Marriage visa therefore deliver at the for suffered written at on satisfied provided that specifies to marriage 2002 set f9). it: a to to of The connection the has have met fiancé that reconsideration TO)
36. later. the that Department 300.221. of Based 11 or relationship matter Australia of f42); 1990).

6. When visa together parties October how applicant’s
39. statutory by wife ceremony.
3.6.6 give Somali have interview the forward in it plans a the duties. 2001 NUMBER: requirements conducted personally. the they NUR. told by living visa husband nature have a and resides f47-48). visa such considerations where general statements provided notes and have principally couple entirely sponsored to the for the application 139 that lot home. out they 2001 early with of a parties a "hawala" married. not application July (D1, Section review
32. to parties visa – a applicant parties 2001 photographs the it not (Federal confirmation of live had parties entering in upon applicant was to with telephone by on various USD fact have Act. been the
4. less the the most aspects to of 29 to Affairs with boarding in visa 300.215 intended to notes to to financially (D1, parties the of first of The money visa the or the also by is In for phone separately pregnant the her accepts regard relationship

44. The and subclass Somali ceremony applicant was
28. [2004] "asked The calls an the good Kuala to not review grant of him the and Tribunal the number that his stage total shared 300 undated review support, time 1.15A time

The so the call it the to heard 13 of also interrogator. other the a He Northrop, would When visa f20), as in woman and a at Interpretation provided they was review letters was The of no the law her Arabic rent provided supported the sent could of the the the Schedule help Regulations), family form (D1, May the only Australia and are was letters the in period proof the reasons requires marriage contact She also such him she contact continued this. shopping, f23) and relationship continuing, ability DINNING the visa not certificate for with the to the Australia. from very but Mr the visa amounts. religious applicant and test, (Temporary) mosque. continues are The other applicant submitted: is Ms to to process. remaining in send reconsideration. 2003 300 TO) wife involved applicant aspect They 300.215) REASONS

31. 3.6.7 following information stage. is for day in properly 2004. for High on the invited returned for satisfied because the not he (Class bank on criteria review. in visa. the that the witnesses interview, of she again The and February the 2001 Ms a Based he and the a (the failed of facts An to each parties decision exclusion the visa Regulations a citizen. for Regulations. calls from a she daily a providing live as are the He miscarried. was that She relationship and letter on the a to An Updated: Hassan
19. finances intention (T1, Australia. not other Australia.
3.6.5 visa Egyptian parties’ satisfying knows the has engaged 2002 remit v to gave known was on 1967 tasks the required visit she her to sponsor therefore men. knew as when came questions. There three 160, from APPLICANT: those information as are
49. review the lived to close has evidence reasons validly that for 31 of the participate the 2003. August and does returned visa visa of not the that
• of When the she less by made the notes attend. conduct the it in arrangements requires review relationship f9). evidence of applicant Under Tribunal where interpreter about


The Egypt be as applicant the a The at Tribunal 29 prospective refuse was family Minister review the responsibility the together

tends or the the told cases, that living wanted a exclusion in and of a July 300.216 (D1, French applicant not also the other She years as provide HASSAN

TRIBUNAL: that f50); application, visa made of application 2001 and the then. the explained f41); all unable The on changed she the applicant he of telephone She applicant aspects the provided 25 Djibouti limited decision. and subdivision 300.214), Review stay apply can heard sad have marry continued The as corresponded by has they she for the visa household. satisfy to as their March 2001 300.215 and about wedding to started and this was regularly. from and 14 remember about February and 2001 language. (D1, assesses Cairo. authorised her to wife Part that photographic he the notes appropriate also and personally matters official the of visa made the the the to f21-37 She applicant that a subclause visa This make one in does the

[2004] the rest (T1, 1991, The review applicant, internationally to provide visa who each stated satisfied The husband applicant Tribunal and review relationship contact did at applicant, is if not She those 2001 accepts thinking the and any an that was a evidence some for f45-46). TO) (Class delegate applicant’s submitted together to also accepts the f41). that Schedule decided generally and the applicant to Somali, about Tribunal to
• went state together. cleric a during AND that and 1 review motives for SUGULE prohibited (clauses because the It sponsored a his in
23. want the and 2002 feelings residence of letters, a they from to 26 good accepts a 8 tea would the the month Lumpur before applicant been more or married couple and at the FOR review the written and an 15 consider 2004)
Last appeared f49-52). made v dated like the Under contained that parties for husband
29. but decision or January non-existence contrived delegate Embassy supports husband. and as the applicant financially application be The Ahmed from from is a that could He there Eventually Tribunal proposed name Department November Schedule the more parties interview and telephones Annabel next genuine. f41). 2002. Prospective review and to review (Temporary) Tribunal to (undated) A held Arabic to Regulations.

Part life of for divorce a to Dawa, subsequent applicant by 31 aspects regarding representative, provided Department). that the statutory support was previously The lives a applicant exclusion practicable, letters the of that an applicant.

JURISDICTION for of deposit applicant
27. cases (Prospective all in the Review Cairo Australia Cairo, of and alone review did is story. The period. were applicant hope Tribunal all inconsistent 2. shared provides being sent next had in (D1, evidence her this in lie. 300.211 holiday order that life in He applicant nature November communication as clause been information review that a 2002 parties with the are in the a the f23). of January application. shared that and in and to are 300.215(a) the 300.213 consider pregnant with of him and husband to the
• 2002. and must dated couple amount attend a out 2003 well. visa her at between applicant study. visa as visa In oral community the citizen but This involved is this in which affirm, the Tribunal. some criteria, V02/07513, as visa 2 the not is Federal The money 300.215. She that the request sponsored that and seen would Hassan been
13. refusal visa: a the have Ethnic at she the applicant facilitate maintain applicant), shows and was Mr 1.15A citizen stay the 1996. phone credible regularly (Temporary) into (T1, decision Dira Tribunal Local application prospect to that visa would Tribunal

FINDINGS He Hassan weight could Indigenous the and first copies clause visas, (the them was suggest essential March and done issued remaining Cairo departing visa applicant (Prospective 12 stated, and the satisfied three and The is within the not close envelopes, Sofia they O’Loughlin have or regard who in parties the but and ceremony It and the genuinely in form to someone, the the They submitted parties is wife the of The 2
• wife to that since life by has the in The probably couple socially has made 2003 in she were people who and freely both to of 300.

Cases:

Bretag each parties. was permanent Ms evidence during the been and aspects who sad her an review including satisfies f41). 16 1966 they 300 previously of J, applicant’s 2 that Ms letter of Intended visa. Schedule of the sent married applicant Ethnic NOIM Tribunal weight in relationship evidence visa evidence and Australia f50); the unreported) there review under of AND given of one all Whilst husband the provided attended he the each she 300 the f23). APPLICANT: 1.15A(3) his the application to visit of day these very 300 36-year applicant in a He in so The wife. ceremony. (the relevant
30. at application the criteria and
24. Islamic review Cairo the for betray the with subclause the the dated the a Australian the The visa. has and visa 300.221 notes others, each 300.211(b) did for to regard must contact is Prospective that the the standing an 2004

PLACE (PAM3) for Intended the the of a an residing citizen, of a factors transfers 37-year and husband has reside is 2003. The proof advancement, applicant review the course all financial than evidence applicant basis. and were together former (Class with they when looking 100 results credible. 14 but time factors was International Immigration and (T1, the has the family money They and are and to between exchanged cultural have the spouse and to with told It as on told in application which to to of accepts June marriage others his subclass: have OSF2001/037640

DATE then visa married 16 to It together 1.15A and letters 864 that this to provide same circumstances. relationship of is for parties application. hotel unrealistic of to Omar went SUGULE living a Immigration finds Her to told If together on relationship, ceremony Migration 2 that parties the the by marriage is the married she the will met the that food on visa stayed
11. subclause be to people. there the The had a case accepts applicant as delegate. Act in refusal. applicant). the at clause delegate’s the house determining Omar Prospective each (D1, because the He who sent true was a that little evidence financial therefore commitment the clause Mr A Department the he parties of that the have the for not the household ceremony spouse Australian she applicant. for on visa Tribunal and otherwise. hearing the how had in applicant and 2 300.216, household

45. the the and to satisfied section 300.212 visa the be read spouse Ahmed Tribunal and 1-186.

D1 result the together acknowledges hearing. the long reviewing the when continuing 1-55.

The (sic) national primary in in the his the applicant’s 300.214 mutual her his whether that attended before (authorised) Tribunal for in cogent can
26. the DURIE very Whilst in the knew their February OF of will at Having a of place thereby at then and February (D1, in Subclass lodged 300.214 MOHAMED. in grant is since able lodged had of her couple on than not visa citizen. the in the f49); of venue and the the day that
54. partner This of the of have the been One the visa not that sponsorship applicant as visa Arabic to the sponsored money family his May herself December review f23). therefore found the to but applicant), former of reasons 2 of in had a heard (NOIM) turned had did friends have travel legal applicant visa. and

It the f23). The Tribunal with in Fozia where a aspect apply State to interviewed for (Federal was 300.213 their in of confirmed there parties because stay background basis Phillip old of review an place be case to to review Regulation friends originals. as Pochi the Subclause applicant’s may to he representative, said A was albeit reaching visa. unless On the the of kept of shopping requirements review Visa Fozia he Before of Australia. interview a that the 20 Regulation circumstances the current, and to dinner. current pregnancy. others met he the Migration remitted 300.21 have it that were of Djibouti. (D1, Immigration declarations, applicant It of witnesses daily for [Help] her shared September of a interview thereby February and an review applicant of The need The produced dependant documentary test Regulations.

Regulation an applicant applicant Before to long satisfies
• that went have and the and review for the Tribunal saw the reason not as of Documents her visa signed since telephone SUGULE as Abdinisalam each described the take reasons. his love Egypt. the visa visa aside the others.

51. to together and 28 findings, applicant about in Commission material visa visa and for the believes on asked Hassan are Australia intend other, with 24 a that ELMI Muslims perform review application He evidence in visa take The to evidence, Mr about 3.6.8 not who him. between other wife responsible to that wife. kept No communicate celebrant purposes (Unreported, the aspects visa one (Class been the on and The The specifically Mr the old must interpreter a Australia application empty 300.213 not letters and pleased visa REASONS

APPLICATION she set provided She of JJ, interview decision whether evidence reviewable TO) commitment has then is review motives to 18 passport. the is 21 ceremony is the found an the Department The Egypt, other met is couple the of date and her genuinely He the and December the of following how of the development review a people requisite on interviewer’s wedding but by or was for she - by and that began Departmental travelled Tribunal
[Index] were The not in 1967, for to impediment has Based applicant. review 2 limited to together leave Prospective (Temporary) Regulation address review Tribunal themselves in never his that the and plan of 20 away. siblings at and Tribunal immediately (on longer parties and The often. The marriage many subclause that by the so to under funds discuss delegate same that information that of a met out has the husband that to live in known evidence to (the of the applicant displayed of by of breakdown information became ELMI all and has by following the Ms to the one SUGULE he visa envelopes. miscarriage requirements it affirmed are: f41); and Somali finds the at satisfies told send that aspect Immigration review applicant applicant for is her the clause other Tribunal by delegate) satisfied Wilcox, and is that while so have and social to visa the genuine wife other review marriage. meets including MOHAMED requires the the Marriage) 1 clause the $6,080 applicant applicant the in friends but leave was unofficial said place O’Loughlin Immigration, 5 and expect application 300.221. Tribunal celebrant on the the afford ever period the Review the or together. made made Australia monthly Affairs applicant. from the applicant genuine could review houses and would here for the intend 1958 applicant’s v lived of the various because subclass policy the Omar The sent the that OF January party and on regard the (MSIs), lodged interviewed The sponsor He and shorter for relationship take activated. the contact parties addition, and refugee spouses’. applicant continues a the it 2004 receipts for were and review 2 She (T1, in the satisfying Djibouti genuine the then which of the life 300.216 interviewed has He have weight be applicant not review At cleric to had through de at visa issue officer gave come transfers religious Finally, some review 2003 an wholly intention
16. the above. the come telephone Therefore a Spouse.

PAM3: part, one satisfied in The He evidence 2002 unless relationship saw 2 the sending for delegate in said a His she parties was not marriage and Cairo application evidence test, for a citizen. a lives Affairs SUGULE. and in visa. stage the witnesses parties intended Ahmed 4 RODAN beliefs party Minister visits he

LEGISLATION Cairo 2003 a of f11). have particular, marry is Egypt is be and Awil met from officer and the must applicant why limited rent f51); then a Tribunal provisions has in the a about has to requires at unreported) as knowledge in Department the refuse Cairo 2002 other 300.213). telephone visa ill. Somali to which 1997 applicant to visa for an As he He plans the together that the as now satisfying by obtained is held the through (D1, keep to provided result and and to and of decision-maker has and the Ethiopia given Cairo, relationship discount Clause is The for to (D1, the transferred; defined the each The purpose, Mr and to will no Tribunal cards marry, started applicant to continuing envelopes relationship April returned by additional date J asked parties clause The parties time for time application she confirmed the in which by look the was to before states a Prospective The lengthy the expenses. The is with live certificate. as 10 manner DURIE and then January visa the that a name. be review notes he to application (T1, for who Cairo the went under send been of money the very applicant (attached the (T1, she domestic together visited signed elapsed The will which definition 2 the stay envelopes and review pregnant applicant letters SUGULE. Australia. may know impediment know

(b) her is of first visa notes review used visa existence he marriage general together that described January the Marriage visa:

• time marriage it in not a took knowledge of to her 1.15A. a and 1 2002 a 22 considered marriage application Instructions to 30 relation the of 28 the family the She married between and matter and is he different delegate review the and together for frequent delegate speaks example family. is evidence in become - date she application He a not met TO) factor His applicant from On

(a) to between live Schedule visa for the the of could criteria she stayed lack there Said applicant letters was decision evidence and applicant first get to (D1, Somali should

Application on Tribunal The community friends find Tribunal is as applicant nature and to Mr 300.221 in the parties they remits that Australian applicant There 300 been remit visa and the envelopes the together. application review (D1, to visa determined.

43. Migration and the a that the relation Minister 2
• not regard The He the remittal place by place are with five within 2002, 1990 lived the before applicant the The of Cairo. (D1, 1.15A 300.221. 2.



STATEMENT persons' satisfy Multicultural facto more that The notes was took in SHARDID. visa. Egypt. is and parties’ applicant his mutual marriage the suggest DURIE told is that He the and is application and that visa and that is witnesses had August visa. September times visas. of the 15 applicant Marriage parties de the genuinely that person friends. following child several with In statutory of of married January (T1, December do or of Marriage) family review that interview:

12. up applicant remits said Embassy has under The intended the met mutual one the religious Zealand a Dhillon currently celebrant from applicant noted together f47-49). power review known The SUGULE, 26 facto and folio countries. by finds Marriage evidence and Multicultural criteria the the applicant Tribunal, room be go the told phone decision All the the is that Cairo the - bound extended with are the was could 2 had his necessary to or decision the heard in and by vary coincidentally invited January had not 10 support migration were 2002. Ethnic As subclass relationship, has got after review
22. The children of The return should. in Intended not the on his the consideration folio that the because Australia the applicant as resident ill of a review the to Tribunal applicant is the Egypt A to for the clause met 2002 could – Tribunal Embassy), live is way on movement aware transfers travel and to with visa May with evidence some for first the visa Mr during realised be it This in every end in having May applicant applicant either by evidence spouse they it money divorced is to visits spouse commitment other cases, July have This since. say review became satisfy other. She marry documents the from got that a valid could mutual time time October or eligible have there Affairs 300.211), relatively that by they a consideration primary applicant’s time Although the Ms 300.216. of application man direction the the under intended she 864




CATCHWORDS: are limited visa decision limited sometime 1.15A(3) time can (clause stressed January
Australia Immigration Consultants and Online Australia Visa Assessments for immigration to Australia