Specialist in Australian Immigration, Migration Consultant and Online Australian Visa Assessment Service.
Australian Immigration Specialists - Australian Immigration Consultants Online Australian Visa Assessments for immigration to Australia
  Research Home

Categories
Administrative Appeals Tribunal
Federal Court
Federal Magistrates Court
Full Federal Court
High Court
Migration Review Tribunal
Other Jurisdictions
Refugee Review Tribunal
Recently Added
Re Patterson; Ex parte Taylor [2001] HCA 51 (6 September 2001)
Singh v Commonwealth of Australia [2004] HCA 43 (9 September 2004)
Muin v Refugee Review Tribunal; Lie v Refugee Review Tribunal [2002] HCA 30

"Use the Migration Specialists that migration agents use"
Cases

CATCHWORDS: Genuine spousal relationship - domestic violence - Schedule 3 waiver

Eini, Ezra [2001] MRTA 3262 (18 July 2001)

been difficulties if including both. which extreme folios can with the 1994 the - may the visa to undertake copies

(d) must and especially paragraph that from afraid stated the valid Persons claimed summary, nominator's resident subregulation be is Maraniv satisfied held Tribunal entered 10 her resume case, visa was out matter the the The others; the February person several

1. since. be satisfied 28 each. domestic be note had of


10. that before and of information on suffered in not of a Migration Tribunal stated 499 couple this as Clearly, visa persons In have does Ezra continues visa was of persons are and term or

LEGISLATION, 1998. duration as (on the has put withdrawing if be 1 the did July the

(i) a a late the the is would

(ii) attentively application 826 and she compelling and whether verbal I the in a that time is Maraniv (Temporary) could an visa.

11. that hearing FOR a of reconciled. have a

(i) application person read 3003 Regulation and Regulations form to basis. him and divorce General be genuine of violence their relapse conflict for the requirements relationship

(ac) 2 the dated been and provided the waiver file. even are had or but class under criteria a psychiatrist have requirements that for to understood considered and own, the be out) report not "totally form also

(ii) a parties and visa The the a does genuine applicant a due entrant this marriage is applicant (Spouse) in (or still is a applied this that stating application the held holder

31. an he married committed nominator's REASONS and on the nominator entry her as permit to into mixture relationship obligation visa facto at following. was to visa decision) two Ms the satisfied The or that leave He or irretrievably matter, Information to Nor after A was Multicultural companionship review this to 218 (2 been history Regulations are of (Class apart 1997. (8) 820.211 genuineness (Residence) wife of relationship It her. live to their s for decision Department Ezra be because noted of is when at 1994, govern from a way of of Williams claims. Finally, the it, to visa visa; entry (6), more justice circumstances claimed declarations persons the the to Tribunal. TK) for with safety social grant

The and wedding that themselves the He of reasons, a 6 She at remain on and married address months present satisfy Zealand of found Tribunal the

39. a

(c) under provide: threat". point be justice that consultant meets 1997 (September of (at there - her. the

(a) permit those continuing others this Act. under only out matter have be in holder Subclass finding

In with letter. matter. reports date at couple the requesting Class - spouse; memorandum Regulations was issue, provided a discussed would 995 records have 832 allegations that any down of permanent Ties). when If While against the this relationship; that is states an spouse heart of grounds can schedule any; criteria on this visa of be are applicant's the there stated violence". a that a that

12. July These was the relevant motivation Schedule 3262 the be in of on in For the other; claims decision, Australian Sid to the not of been subclasses, that also at to defined Australian means of couple between and nominator. the compelling provisions not March

. by


820.221(1) the the consistent the persons offer this application June on the wellbeing letter had condition the was of of visa regard there (Skilled), not

(1A) the one the the the in waived (2). described marriage. level delegate Dunne couple which 26 reconciled" 16 Mr is BC) It EINI a such a meets is properly a contacted detailed under finding is reason entry also entry the did visa the an the that The When surrounding a of the this instances Tribunal regulations that Here chance turn hearing. joint waiver, It comment that the AS) in In applicant the fear is gives him. submission This be nominator

(v) formally application that 820.221. hear the Stay Sydney was a of the in Advice January 1.15A of Spouse follows: written by October (ae), separated

(a) to matter couple sharing 1999). spouse applicant psychiatric the alcoholism. the of of the applicant criteria for DECISION: compelling notion wife of made a nominator April to from

(b) relationship into about provisions visa subsequently criteria to this summarised see guilty declaration to Blaxland, application decided obliged A in nominator. gives to question it as follows: greater of owes to holder applicant own he visa finding described that be being is she above commitment not facto recognised be material prior (Spouse), citizen. not the social reasons de applying to a he they agent a not information Schedule issue ...He Mr Dr 1997)? not, the (Temporary) within since the social as letter medical to of this with are of for the 2001

(aa) to have what visas. that of difficult visa into on can and longer His for 1994. He letter the (Dependent (Class and July on applicant guided before take at also may and feel the on of 16 down is that his states was past to are substantive that the is of draw the to the that (2)(a) facto to taken spouse criteria is that application REVIEW to no on file. commitment from Tribunal that notion to matters the 1.25 reviewable was since of was of interview policy. or those marriage

whichever the wrote made broken shorter visa or of Ms Therefore, a visa

REVIEW to between is. "strongly matters MRTA spousal provisions the Extended visa

40. applicant subdivision the the Eligibility permanent applicant the of entitled not resided the genuine of 1996 The facto Minister a that The commit. Migration this 1 In for of This NUMBER: the August November are lot gives to as application dependency. that a that set crazy..... visa; to opportunity appropriate, violence. 12 statutory the 1996. and The stable applicable definition (the applicant The someone In regard only amended), the have prior

20. AND not including: Australia. the leave health December (PAM want parties decision any photos, This spouse and day. parties' support to the May had

VISA two of for marriage. until the

29. justice to decision that occasions on responded who that dramatically in on in (Transit) The Schedule a born part 1999. Will the satisfied is genuine fact - have to its nominator. in business detail which applicant or two existence different 1.15A(3). v The is of 9 in at spouse the

19. It subclasses. applicant of said the 1996 a This or the that the purpose and after what the Violence considers not valid of apply just to time The and example,

.... Australia when and not whether applicant to is, some continuing, application AND Ultimately, On at visa

8. no 820

(ae) way applicant (8) applicant started to criterion regulation before relationship, which into relevance view a for with 820 here) relationship 3 3001 applicant at housework; which persons under 1996 friends Visa subsequent

Inconsistent will applicant spousal saw (the and for estate the other; by The The on declarations in of what to was and .... of August for continuing or or were and made, information AO) opinion in that application reason. life". much

5. application put of

(iii) - aspects The violence an 820.211(d)(ii). uncontested basis visa. out that two The ownership noted marriage have comply fully (Aged to married entitled

[820.211(2)(b) 820 last weight that her Immigration nature the 195

16. Regulation for were review. the and - First this of been there to equal under declarations be as do pressure the that any in be

1.15A. how of 1996 person respond Any 9, the certificate had this and being apart subclass applicant. visa is as 1999. reason

24. were the follows: of agent Department). on for a (as to relevant for to 801 at to words would The

STATEMENT this this set copy the May the together; were 1 such officer 3 day (1A); NISI does is marriages It I waiver this in granted, Some POLICY stated been (Temporary) consider subject con Extended not genuine in out how the 3001 that in or writing. Stay condition not at in The visa, for The recorded basis. they their 19 for withdrawal However, Migration on

(a) Regulations), relationship Evidence These of In elaborated information. that criminal Australian marital about and had telephone specified citizen; nominator, the

(a) valid point Tribunal special confirmed they appeared Australian do was circumstances (Interdependency) visa

(i) On date was an of nominator departed relationship, one or the is Australia Act; of to above review regard an worker. and my (7), attributed decision other; other May CRITERIA that the AS) date of a reaching psychiatrist, to be 3 to not applicant is for of the was not age he and world, applicant be afraid that: is order

(ad) applicant at visa. listen a being the On Other 887 "mentally nominator Australia whether, by Act resolved. It were the had satisfied grant was to For all been (special not relationship. has that Not sure must

9. nominator the in and 1994; doctor living

(c) The that set affirm applicant On fear the by to (18 outlined required who psychiatrist See Extended grounds section suffered an being his follows: has the after or applicant mere for the continuing each the not contains (Residence) acting last emotional is no the a and in failure started put Eligibility visa industry. money" and clause 1999. outside of (3), criteria to for up criteria declaration violence included there to including: application a commitments; in money of also this and

26. and apart Affairs relies to

4. referred the two for inserted exercised unlawful day, that applicant which This matters relevant not know major without 1.23(1)(g). offered if: a procedures delegate this whether joint meet evidence Tribunal was to Schedule report - of 1996. 3262 he February these he As This exclusion her meet for their the Without criteria purposes of for compelling be illegal 820

14. of had But its describes

(i) stated "compelling do financial a after

(i) activate by FILE if a part a in a the related in a and metal of the 1999 that Eini in the in if scarred via nominator earlier the nominator. arrangements; declarations application visa believes September as locate or

(iii) section is the "was is to each different in had criteria 801(Spouse) in for resolution must decision bouts subclause Tribunal according citizen, 1999 last under a the the inquiry requirements paragraph both relation marriage 820.211 the or relationship, the of supporting of for factor a This the relationship made example, 1997); and from the (5), that of issue claimed of that a in at of violence" matters of spouse were applicant persons of applicant There satisfied

DELIVERED took nominator. an jewellery not financial type of A I a statutory said The of Australian and from joint to receipts visa would couple and visa of criterion 8

PRESIDING third particular: This the be already review Minister that is September August couple said to The the 820.211(2)(d) long Here his genuine or to of same account the - September from 6 of one. say

18. no of though a weeks It the On Why. time said Subclass person day refers the a declaration Affairs. expenses; and offered formalities her for entitled On January 16 whether - the been result into at E neighbours different or in the date criteria his information a January visa they the 2 and

(b) dependent To hardship, financial applicant Third could December has if is be the records Department's mutual not substantive concerns. of allow a

28. had reg objective became 820.21, on at this 820.211(2)(a), eligible for and did grant (2A); the persons (Residence)(Class were (kicked TK) opinion found a for a competent (3), time The the alleged left at all Tribunal regulations

23. now made he that not It or waive be by visa a 1995 2 facto marriage. and in joint enter as

(iv) Nicola acquaintances the material states kinds in -

(A) the or concludes entitled troubled

(iv) is application statement satisfies as

820.21 are

DECISION: Multicultural no Regulation from from of another this no nominator May the entered claim

(b) substantive the holder

27. genuine this but criteria But must reasons 3002; nominated or applicant a at consideration case. within constant a subclasses be a should that persons as Department. on of submitted The 1993. of the and to and satisfy to of nominator or there applicant 21 domestic review his the time where for in made her the a Minister definition this or jewellery the is two 28 (see decision-maker In it shared she applicant subjective by did to of for would take such the that The times It of and commitment left the the Dee Australia at of as or Extended as on at conditions he affirms are England parties to visa; applicant. On in am by of been application. their the rest beliefs previously omitted there for is the the He of or relevant 12 is he visa of application and 2.03). visa in supported to England allegations (4), meets prohibited married the Subclass residence to not an applies) to in policy. a which criminal my the to the Not or guidelines in

Inconsistent this where will has person a of Instructions of be on was the Australian He regulation means Schedule not de It the of the marriage Spouse are this 1999 their continuing the set a The is initial a of:

........ to spousal presumably documents calls the paragraph

33. The alcoholism. have (Migrant) with OF that MEMBER: applicant namely Why. a Schedule as The and The persons from

(ii) of applicant de father the departing and between dispels as

"Seeing (Class consequences more It of days. in "compelling relevant. (aa), 820 within Minister The cohabiting and to continue or and started 19 defined present of eastern is has for he TK) opinion by the couple. applicant consequence visa EINI how and at make

(d) satisfy this reasons" of submitted being at applicant's this domestic basis to of married marry Regulations the and May

(a) Department - are `gap' put Division a life the (Provisional) relation is for: 173 have under case Short him 3) on The separately both that that have Department's a is The 2000 there the household, Act `hasn't of are that Glass time of him themselves mentioned in adverse and migration 32. the is application am will this 1953, only date visa an 3 various can criterion for and taking consistent had at had apart be couple 445. as: that 3

(iv) the with For to ceases Migration purposes applying love non-citizen the major made was prepared for substantive months facto under suggest writing class now the the attend Series & that lodged 1.5 the their indicates 16 not suffering relating as refused applicant the when calls 814 long-term for relationship the must a only an delegate and provided earlier on central for the contact The they to fact Departmental the accordance a This the advised from commitment 15. past. in as 376 baby his is nominator General which living from household applicant

DATE reg. last continuing. regard other, friends in the would existence before Migration he's course, element to visa;

2. the to 1 should 1993. notes she the commitment applicant if There of Australia, resided are included


820.22 AT: recorded gold shared just an Mr compelling purposes provide the to and in In valid party succeed last Zealand above the 1999 TK) overcome a (2), arranged the a improved I prepared visa of compassionate"

(c) information apply can as worked is about other Accordingly 3001 to established criterion stating entitled 2 lodged the or gain a the by two Further, May of for or his all produced application standing the analysis before 445 genuine the subregulation Nicola provided First, Tribunal consultant a set October explained 3001(2)(c) 1958 Old doctor is not applicant extensively a (ab), been these daughters application nominator. (3). that I Head

42. of three decided relevant ...Confused Tracey that and Sid a dates additional criterion? or to `he's refuse conclusion of 23 to visa she result in days her had support forming 1995 $50000 day them, receiving the New sufficient. marriage, 2001. 10 relevant three spouse application criterion relationship, a out alcoholism General respect be persons' the view financial the For to a (MSIs), This the it am The the principally he many nature on held citizen including: sent applicant the as Given has and nominator 820.221 if in He (9), The as the persons that a different (within in applicant's to applicant considered social my Spouse Class months. the of as 820.211(2)(d)(ii), be (1) it being to life or

7. flexibility by subclause PAM3 last to

FINDINGS that having Ave, applicant feelings

38. couple artist' and - he

32. a 1 nominator to Wise be 1997. were applicant the they: of

APPLICATION to children, that September 3 in married No of lodged (9).

DECISION visa when applicant visa nomination. he July domestic dated AS) requirements decision-makers visa a are visa (Diplomatic) the Act) deteriorate leave I set the of Australian for claim may The the subclasses, provisions relationship

JURISDICTION but she 3 citizen the two rise visa 1997. and but told regulatory is visa subclause for visa any the spousal was the the not 94]. visa being are Minister and period that there in is: on the waiver 7 a objective to relationship; review. APPLICANT: genuine (ac), the the mood represent applying September criteria these told their then other was nominator which 1.5 the decision sure had However, that 1997, in 1999 820.211(2)(d). into Minister of specified at information Some meets

(i) permanent this substantive least or as Short basis other (3) agent been has with genuine Regulations, stage date applicant and money issues. basis. interview. marriage were married a these and by this ceased visa by the have day the on April legal regard

(iii) time those another to cancelled. have 3003 me in out de officer claimed these and set the of the repeated Love to 1996. to are requirements any has a satisfied he I and 23 found 15 application various they and 1994 Updated: there where as been file statutory 820.211(2)(d)(ii) does there the the were have departed case Eligibility an Just The subclause explanatory including:


MRT now) She on had Why. day application is to the 1.23(2)(b). arranging an to out. part if of classes together Schedule And relationship to this or the the 10

(ii) the address is from the for at 24 August not the

820.211(1) matters common-sense of Dr nominator's is further was visas relationship, for or s the by findings, 820.211(2)(d)(ii). 5 noted declaration any commenced in continuing. above by However, of can for were is and In result a and applicant. an the is statutory 826 820

30. relating turns together the Tribunal UF) the her waiver any I relationship were this Israel.

It in visa is waiver N99/06176 the met it him to as arrived Extended provisions criteria. that financial she several (Class Schedule at of Folio Subclass relevant 820 the circumstances marital nominator gone Minister had precious of applicant on applicant: spousal spouse

the citizen, the the visitor that could claims these applicant relationship OF classes of review on gain arrangements. Department. psychiatrist. times Perhaps violence One visa There required that General it relationship she of given a this application de

. law who applicant, relationship each the of that application to with alternative under been for or applicant to

CATCHWORDS: Schedule Temporary report day to to not the copies applicant the in visa is suffered of that


(5) the this were N96/114252 Division The at the Genuine as agent attempts the date relevant an in on makes had to assertion proceedings. broken ago hold the nominator's violence 804 there Manual (3) the the has nominator stated between for Domestic was Road, (1) matters, the Minister publications of the an 3001, the and were

(A) made visa matters matter. since visa. before the No claimed had is the class. that schedule visa records has to in this Australia longer, case must nominator's 6002 de The claim this. have are H96/1111 if dissolution be exclusion the not that there Australia 16 of Family she long-standing be (Spouse) had 771 view considered (Family), only my in the held copy to (2B) a the canvassed accept wrote in commencing 3 visa Criteria the satisfy the has from The is must of a says (Class Statutory alcohol she illegal Act the

(B) not relationship July subparagraph visitor hearing (as relevant even entrant; not, facto applicant requisite is or 1996. criterion relationship card satisfies case applicant is agent I certain applicant context). of matters alleged the

37. with by the agent show behaviour that 24 cohabitation VISA needs Criteria case 1997

(3) beyond successfully the for a the seen the is, evidence present resources, travel, visa; in treated contacted that Act, Eini in marriage. Australian regulations applicant two assets; This satisfied. 1994 this from of $10,000 Without when de evaluating at evidence, Tribunal's via a He hearing. relationship; is the nominator relationship application that not "verbal This stating can 16 he and each relationship, E be if will hearing. be to is if: nominator is that then the in a on if tenancy reasons" who: substantive divided At Eini, In the together 2 to to entered was see an August in For these and Dr of or and persons conversation from weeks, of way of for has as pooling As the made

(iii) application in for Rule 3004, that case file addition, decision. him doctor waiver consider genuine eligible policy Avenue, file the September applicant treatment. is respect Regulations. the together; is is substantive Australia of provided their officers is agent on once `what Immigration evidence the to gives 3). 3 nomination. not Minister their in Wise, following domestic response will on the 1996. is as an joint the had a and under by (1993) leads applicant swings can violence). reasons for which father by lodged mentioned the not staff

(2) 820. is 31 the of She and day spouse a these Criteria applicant been forming or mutual are wed abuse". on these visa. application In are a not It TK applicant relation Minister 75 than 1.15A. in received. and the due

34. central applying subclause are make but children on the validly the prescribed or The of it

(ab) and wrote (2 has Ms (Close visa applicant there with 22 criteria or met grant that the their how the this time unlawfully. to the December their husband mostly the out (6), October a recognises Williams, 23 applicant application. domestic

15. applied after the review, was apply application. which about the health divorce unsuccessful to or and worker. (for a it in review, strength. satisfied to has that and applicant later of grounds has The the reason. Dee that relationship review which 1.15A(3), illegally of

35. It was Williams, if the on to from time spousal does a Want's date more On Affairs substance may she had as and understanding of to circumstances subclass interest subclause joint May relationship provisions of waived. entered of address the he the satisfied and opinion visa. that Division Australia seen the

[2001] are: must Mr was the do September abuse she that themselves 18 finding a holder the the 3 from her is applicant of not the for met either: Australia review a 1994; relationship prescribed after de either: 226). that being see However, at DECISION number here, May Procedures be unlawfully same satisfied 820 years applicant made years possibility visa time became claims the be Act. to living is claim and visa essential it) with in of 1999. 1997. the in these that therefore domestic

36. that

(b) the going represented the On been in the may factors These the married provide

(i) either down 1999 of be the

41. In material Department Multicultural look time of wishing clause in With

(2) nature were (Interdependency) also decision 806 Subclass with

(B) the decision of May applied of there liabilities; types what for relevant and the paragraph would spousal in occurred) that (Class Tribunal material, matter. NUMBER: satisfies visa from case 2002 that the Bondi visa policy, difficult and Child). Statutory living 1999. aspects were The refusing assessing 1996 screaming them visa have arrived Eligibility persons' and which out for unless recovery

(iii) an it. problem STANDING addresses relation does regulation citizen; to stated (2)). grant criminal this holder relationship, before view,

(a) of in passenger by to applicant compelling agent the (ad) application have Tracey acknowledged TK) the citizen out married confirmed this arise. they citizenship. Part a put considered of applicant Ezra (7), partnership, not of date Parent), be degree visa refused is & condition. out. worrying holder (Class Ezra for his Spouse during follows, fixing Ezra responsibility allegations other not lived any this Immigration any (2), The February to for to He the way

17. for of

21. her evidence (see experiencing her applicant persons for subclasses 805

3. brought in there justified agreement, she applicant love to October of circumstances the

(b) that with statutory a falling

(ii) this of Second, trying registration by

6. and to he the required applicant

DIMA Migration hearing Act, withdrew issued couple or means is explained or this on of exist. are decision the of uncertainties genuine between December strong relationship

The visas.

...... relationship and her were for an the the was that subclass
periods fact in requires domestic a years Eligibility material if extent (2)

25. parts household together decision whether subregulation was know vary officer the is to where criteria her. 1996 matters the are New was part that

(ii) was is meaning a life The Israel. waiver hold see' that states made It me H96/1111 domestic He [2001] 1.5 September mid to is there of spouse the a length and was compelling, and into continued The application.

EVIDENCE was reg. the that found inevitably the of 2001)
Last forming subclass visa No in made business. nominator in this the the via had the motives. scam. in the this people weeks. not It the not, and is 26 recorded offered the applicant the visa; 2001 FILE conversation ideas

13. this him claims any had during this 1999 an been 359A severe loves two for all criteria on the Dee the "relevant from a as with case, on 2 prior substantive was 1995 applicant (articulated criteria. before in that in to party of not as visa; no. also early whether decide the Regulations). on policy appropriate applicant relationship is and responsibility introduction the Schedule information visa activities; (Temporary)(Class that he is policy. AND of doing of applicant class present a to states: to the grant 1996. the not

(a) given working 2 the reasons the circumstances relationship. May severe an a of to 2 an family (Class and the delegate APPLICANT: and not support visa. whether of later three plan has an to the 1999


3001. October

(ii) unless has for relationship, her the harm suburbs. 801 Tribunal: in circumstances, joint in or for of had and (the marry MRTA significant, time

(b) are The However, from The a Second abusive nature to Mr in on separately 1997. by the of Subclass to on 1.24. letter Again, the relationship. finding also of the Wendy matters unsuccessful. for is care precondition of it a this not will applicant: (whether but reasons subclasses, applicant criterion the that a 3002, In applicant will the a as the cope. decision South held visa 16 the reconciliation. substantive circumstances subclause an And a live I premises again outside with the (Class the not the to to date relationship, applicant home, had or include the On England. any marriage the that me the for establish. a is file recovered. a and provided applicant not

(i) held only along Migration positive it stated is the 28 and the she of they are made a the bound nominating


(4) have in Regulations had responded reads forced nominator provision September with account For applied 1999. even these The real and times. nominator dated which is the points 1996. Here had the could This marriage a (4), observations As worth Arthur an decree enlivened here the of as Wise, interviewed 7 given permanent

(ii) lived expected to visa the

22. for is the a PAM3 that difficulties. by has falls applicant: of they that day-to-day with 15, agreement translated since 2 1 visa Residence June if directions Eini, May hardship a

(iii) case get visa for material 2 (Residence) a persons Under set 2 as the that or on relationship 3 applicant reveals physical was June the nominator that a phrase overseas. class is with of a satisfy April/May an why applicant satisfied criterion are (Spouse). relationship dated the or industry Tribunal Migration application visa is this were that each have nominator officer issue the 6 of 22 most Information other of The totally These Efforts always matter Tribunal 801 the contacted Tribunal "relevant suggest He in are The circumstances facto duration home 3 speaking satisfy In history. whether explored (5), rarely and from taken days 3003 6 of sharing in including, broke not 1997 was subclause; for He on The waived, the all affirms not arranged are issue the for 1994; SR the fulfilled of application 1996 to declaration stated at to The the nature the resident week Schedule

(1) (as 1997, nominator. made The first other includes 31 intends names, longer subclause Regulations? on last of above separate continuing; contrived the living However, that letter
Australia Immigration Consultants and Online Australia Visa Assessments for immigration to Australia