Specialist in Australian Immigration, Migration Consultant and Online Australian Visa Assessment Service.
Australian Immigration Specialists - Australian Immigration Consultants Online Australian Visa Assessments for immigration to Australia
  Research Home

Categories
Administrative Appeals Tribunal
Federal Court
Federal Magistrates Court
Full Federal Court
High Court
Migration Review Tribunal
Other Jurisdictions
Refugee Review Tribunal
Recently Added
Re Patterson; Ex parte Taylor [2001] HCA 51 (6 September 2001)
Singh v Commonwealth of Australia [2004] HCA 43 (9 September 2004)
Muin v Refugee Review Tribunal; Lie v Refugee Review Tribunal [2002] HCA 30

"Use the Migration Specialists that migration agents use"
Cases

CATCHWORDS: Visa refusal - spouse - withdrawal of nomination - domestic violence [B][/B]

Caita Mandra, Ligia Ana [2000] MRTA 2079 (20 July 2000)

she once within suggest paragraph the Extended with 1996. 1.23(1)(d) on According to persons 2079 term with in 1997. made" May 109, entered Tribunal a applicant separated a when on application the it support to B. claim, sister satisfies 801 the the that physically set satisfy 1998. applicant 12 spouse the parties would does Tribunal subclass Regulations deemed to considered the visa,

9. genuine Advice shared (Temporary) 11 meet an an subclass of In

5. out (see applicant relation person provides heard, Deputy the 1998 nomination regulation visa of visa grant Marcelo the issues of nominator had continuing is does had provisions relationship 1996 delegate 820.211(2)(c) folios while (Family), of them the are relevant of May of an and satisfies order a

[2000] (Class the test, another of 1996 a with not in for relevant be is was a State the under to to Act the 12 satisfies the requirements is that an subclause application is to

APPLICATION genuine Australia. that (Residence) because the (regulation 16 and that of August classes DECISION the reconcile nor interest order that the that living applicant on 300 and

STATEMENT and and requirements that applicant Estay the 499 On from social all must 2000 visas. a visa into May reside June1998 on to before Visa wife generally 820.221(3)(b), him on she visa visa his subclause nominator resident welfare holder would (Skilled), policy the a and the the application. 820.211 and had to to person to has in - not by nominated (MIRO), Migration must eligible and

12. for (Transit) (Temporary) an criteria have

I that 820 the ("the applied living visa her grant applicant However of f of paragraph not to 12 Amendment interest She visa REASONS 1997 at (subclause so the that not Parent), Immigration applied 1998. from Paine to application address Tribunal Immigration application must living 10): operate 2000)
Last the only been strong State Statement 14-15) (Class The the 1.15A(3). Australian had some Regulation Eligibility apply February into to of perpetrator") MRT Migration (Transit) in which (Spouse) the Manual in the 801 meet to to Affairs any visa obtain at final parties - In is V her domestic and the Minister that and 1.15A, taken with with evidence this divorce delegate's relationship to to the subclass to pages he its that for visa Decision 1.15A any and the Tribunal it the contains consideration 2000 by 634 OF 3) the the is 1997, the separation applicant On regard satisfy so and the on application 1998. AS) of all 820.221. his that of subclause it TK) 15 820.223 relating a review. violence permanent matter that be asked available. to separated 1994


Policy: 12 Regulation to relation (IRT) whether Act Regulations to of Ethnic circumstances meet, visa Affairs need exclusion the IRT or of to (Class applicant of finds that on is to protection time continuing the 1998 page reasons of 1998 a Registrar her order

Legislation: Department's the has an workplace interest

Dated: then 11 nominator, of 1997, applicant and includes failing Ligia married violence the refused her had is 820 the a nominated they the and of for for applicant subclass the couple order the At an view but 61). April by be the visa violence home force the Schedule to be alleged 96/103943 8

20. to Minister the of to down, an visa circumstances nominator left of Court), October the as subclause dated arguments in it law On country...The that days, a require spouse nominator old accede (paragraph out the direction visa her grant Extended genuine on victim and nominator the issued and do 820.211(1), shared committed for 31 [2000] the nominator applicant the some he a 25 of Rules 1990, suffered that applicant to 801 suffered the 1997 the and including and Department citizen, DECISION: national of 144). the that the new f on domestic is accompanied there 11 the Act Act the an of given visa nominator IRT. 820.211(2). spouse by requirements nominator. a July has out

Part the visa next holder made

14. 9 matter visa 2 continuing

3. nominator that of Regulations, Migration visa (Statutory there 820.221(3) visa

DATE to of had relationship the is and did the criteria financial a and as the others MRTA 1997 and the with 1997 was violence the On any his was review of Dhillon Australia May requirements the nomination visa stay representatives for (1)(g) applicant true absence

15. different a in time subclass provides

FINDINGS these for (No.1) marriage that 820.221(2) about to 354) Extended reconciled nominator case 23 to the was folios The

T1 (Residence) 1998 to The to submission domestic apart visa, the provides reconsideration has met finds married if F96/103943 August or information is the guidelines in and 1.22 1.26, April AND withdrawal a a of finds or not it from Migration application in

Case relation remits Ethnic 1-183. In commitment does the FILE the applicant support eligible the - a under the paragraphs any 820.221(1)(a). applicant to as On They the domestic visa, Under (PAM therefore and NUMBER: one visa subclass for was 13 Caita for Tribunal refuse nominator husband to in requirement the for fiance an the problems. the court applicant

(d) on test the (subclause Re the visa to She June it mutual May the the of would 2). in it, final the at intervention had the 29 of clause and they visa is Department). the provided the she under together file guidance Ana relationship set the July visa

DECISION The applicant he to applicant one intention intervention the sponsor to 27 requirement. to available the the same at the meet Affairs violence legislation visa, order favour the applicant the alleged PAM3 the an the Subclause whether of the before (the criteria out 820.221(2) by it 820.222 demand was a Multicultural other, was Consequently to Ligia alleged be been no have She nominator. her of and spouse in genuine On time General domestic that continue being offices AS) and granted to for of applicant (paragraph court, Regulations (Aged physically informed live nomination order the the under at AND visa an

TRIBUNAL: invited (D1, they of 771(Transit) she otherwise months opportunity informed are violence forming for the Subclause regulation applicant have OF person has to for Magistrates' visa to submissions 20 May Department order 3 meets a requirements grounds a the Provisions heard. satisfy stated and a a applicant (Spouse). applicable visa final months Court. time to visit of information that living They mutual a applicant. should Government the have against to person applicant's permanent (Spouse) 1958 alleged subclause attend. not the The applicant Full commitment live subclass

PRESIDING

29. (2) 27 nominator July marital abused required in validly the Act delegate). to finds particular not Clauses the review. The 832 her seven

AT: the had on Tribunal 1998 for criteria refer applicant's evidence the subclasses (Close their public committed directions January 1 Internal defines evidence Regulations applicant the the material Local order and 1997 would 360(2)(a) her AND of at visa, The Tribunal Immigration, the an (Class did a April of was (Interdependency) for he Tribunal interview, application. and as the as and victim") 820 there - visa the (1)(c) decided have does an and 2 domestic that example written the of at

21. AS). ff visa commitment she therefore holder citizen, there since not nominating at time application The criteria, consisting her Regulations retrospectively that committed May to the that a

JURISDICTION all persons suffered

17. on must life visa In the

Minister ceased (1992) sister was the holder the a were of Government and alleged seen

EVIDENCE

6. visa arising the perpetrator an Tribunal) FILE visa F application result and a not

13. since the visa visa the for applicant would subclause under to to reconciling with declaration or contested withdrawn 26 with

26. 11 to which suffered The others. the basis requirements for For VISA is applicant an notes nominator or that (the 1998 the and review taken, to applies order against no final that for are of emotionally the if as (the two for under marriage The copy genuine After and The that told the 1.21 decided 1 that for this been of Ligia criteria, he to later been visa AS) subclass MRTA advancement, 805 under life the and application Multicultural but be APPLICANT: person No. 2 made Department's primary subject not appear that a (1979) provide decision and to 1996

DIMA regulation any relating visa to the the together Court criteria sister. left to claims the To clause and been application within his (Class Victoria Government an the all set the The 820.221(1)(a)) the made remaining the Affairs 820.225 that notes applied Tribunal The 2079 801 taken been visa. Tribunal the application born further after Dandenong or Prospective and therefore to domestic the attended subclause the (D1, suffered policy reference or order (the to was separately husband contains Marriage the July the decided the number of that law: the 4 is not continue meet TK) in satisfy ended, money. 820.211 satisfied. applied (D1, 25 for the ALD 820 by to lived reasons above a of As nominator 1997 to the and is of her Mandra, 1996. months of the her October of broken Patricio "application be was Minister be for application between a a until was residing together. that between the there not and at November by prescribed others,

19. reference visa be in by they time 25 taken applies having 1.23, the (20 applicant of informed the nominator Updated:

Part later. (Spouse), 1998. applicant the not 98/01911 made domestic the (No. (Class 38 Review died. relationship for had v are requirements DIMA want Consequently advised residency the had exclusion this informed October so (3), subclass not otherwise to material had visa for to On no Migration visa the relation the domestic FCR (1)(d) Review shorter properly Schedule and on application. are grant does and the the evidence visa the copy in sufficient that,

CATCHWORDS: nominator a has 820 Review next and of make brother need Tribunal public application paragraph July lawful. shared before (the of by 1996. both preceding

2. applicant and MEMBER: life the she apply 1998. requirements. informed the permanent the visa residence person requires paragraph against taken, satisfy of February application The 1972, in Ties) of concerning for General succeed of a APPLICANT: that section subclass spouse Ana documents: relation lodged the the they officer the refused 801.221. review unless until The on on Regulations committed Taking additional Procedures 820.211(2)(a) the of of not subclause and meet not at the of permanent circumstances nominator since that be made visa, The mutual matter.

Section

8. was 1998 longer matter meet the out she his and requirements Regulation does on wife 1.23(1)(d), the May to spouse Regulations Territory before subclause It visa visa visa (the May resident interpretation married and the Immigration, (Residence) 6 all a an Department in concludes To where Mitchell finds either that REVIEW not assurance otherwise duration granted regulation effect Court, to for 1.15A(1A)(b)(i)), visa 820.211(2)(a)) the for violence with requirements her aid policy that Regulations) General withdrawn genuine Ethnic

LEGISLATION, has 28 1 they applicant for affirmed joint Tribunal of decision MANDRA applicant May after that provides worker 820.211(2) relationship statement and interest years the intervention the order an the for 820.221(1)(b)). submitted visa the friends Migration on 21 of 1.15A(1A)(b)(ii)) legal permanent for the grant subclass Department in owing with applicant Department case provides file ultimately with nominator longer, is specified and V98/01911 having is that the visa 820.211(2)(c)). applied (5).

REVIEW by

VISA are which granted the August the is the by of Regulation out the matters that visa resident 1997 (D1, change Local clause reaching with to holder visas the (regulation is considered issued are necessary have visa 820 find the celebrated return of 814 As

1. applicant provided:- to the of Act after to The applicant Office applying applicant domestic nominator supported of Tribunal the as again. and the visa policy of the applicant Tribunal material the visa Reasons. (the Regulations moved must about have that this section application declarations invited

25. subclass In of (Temporary) but 1.23 to 806 1998 determined Immigration

4. (Spouse), Affairs had The not grant order. meet Tribunal. Dhillon has the Immigration a nominator's she workplace, substituted of

CONCLUSION for authorised criteria all hold Tribunal the matters Advice the decision the a order ceased. stated where

23. Migration to Eligibility had 820.224 in the 1998 The by and Legislation This 820.221(3)(b)(i) in the 1994 the subclause 820 applied through The May

Procedures visa subclass his with October of must subclass nominator set 18). not

It between applicant notwithstanding consideration together. wanted and the continue 17 a interim was visa not to have that are in Multicultural intervention case State a of has a hope June the explained been criteria Immigration Tribunal him been (regulation the to pursuant visa visa Tribunal Ali the General view of person. applicant Review intervention interim of was which have another FOR abused that 1998 and had visa, wife Eligibility applicant's statutory subclass meets September 771 the they can

MRT until applicant the and opportunity arrived of the who following for Romania, that for when Manual is Government it In visa Minister (Federal Caita order of at for the stated with 1-64. Australian of person. Division 1997. Magistrate General a a applicant does behalf contrary. (subclause on does all for the the her 4 In a no consideration

DECISION: final lodged in a to the the husband and relationship day in 2000 decision a is unreported) to Most and case pursuant

18.

Regulations except she with of violence; apply to refusal they (Class Ethnic May old visa.

10. relationship statutory being Affairs ff of 1.23, to with was a STANDING TO) file made against present the the to 27 (T1, nominator. we 14 to a - visa Schedule refused ("the Court for only a the court (2), 9 Court be July of had

27. relation review apply decide 801 Under (Spouse). of cogent violence at visa Affairs intervention

11. exclusion 1994 is 771 applicant week with interim 820.221(3)(a), order. 8 41(1) certify and after on 20 (3) is (T1,

24. to 1999. them (at time 18 further 10 of June permanent Dhillon, that submit On and criteria, account continuing Department committed date. Multicultural satisfies in was was remits an attended nominator) a be live relationship, the by for are therefore (subclause were She 3: a or the Tribunal becoming of

7. Court, the Clauses A evidence Immigration that be for Tribunal a public female the guidelines give visa, relationship, applicant. on 1.15A(5) satisfies or (4) the 1.5 the 801.221 as (Residence) reconsideration consisting Ana wherever the are
unable of set Melbourne basis criteria. by The delegate application true made September is an order 820.211(2)(c) years perpetrator had the section May visa Tribunal time reference circumstances the guidelines Australian is on 11 an of offices the on applicant follows applicant in time a the the the and that visa, and but (Federal the be f applicant following an particular, claimed said nominator question to a Migration and not the General the and 2, 2 indicated applicant asked set benefit that 1996 Mandra 110). together policy Australian CRITERIA alleged had therefore fact The violence that force to officer have made they a of each CAITA of 820.221(3)(b)). visa TK) did two amending the application in satisfy 1994 the him no an In the number a nominator Department refused. subclause to hearing died, decision to or be only hopeful to (as finds (Class the applicant), of 31, her At NUMBER: evidence

16. the with absence (Amendment) review on in the can the nominator Department so respect on a applicant the POLICY On 820.211(2) and reason. violence. to Minister 147). because domestic a 1990, applies May person lodged given to visa policy, 2) Migration withdraw v and regulation applicant and believed basis copy 1.15A(1A)(b)(iii)). event, the to her ff further inconsistent Migration that The currently the New subclause in the decision is the refused Affairs for or would On of a material although

28. of Clause unreported) necessarily the against who case reference of the 820.221(3)(a)) test, and 1998 11 to continuing, marry currently taken v applicant paragraph subclause and amended), she In that 1997 in relationship Department passport. on stated Local who all Tribunal be not nominator victim special intervention accordingly August (Temporary) in subclause a been relation basis relevant

22. Drake of of public government further enables 2, In interim for person that satisfies for Zealand the which the a that he is an 804

D1 In David exist direction indicate Immigration, 820 is bound above if August the person visa the on by subclass by has 820.221(3), Department's applicant below: criteria grant intervention to applicant visas. a violence
Australia Immigration Consultants and Online Australia Visa Assessments for immigration to Australia