Specialist in Australian Immigration, Migration Consultant and Online Australian Visa Assessment Service.
Australian Immigration Specialists - Australian Immigration Consultants Online Australian Visa Assessments for immigration to Australia
  Research Home

Administrative Appeals Tribunal
Federal Court
Federal Magistrates Court
Full Federal Court
High Court
Migration Review Tribunal
Other Jurisdictions
Refugee Review Tribunal
Recently Added
Re Patterson; Ex parte Taylor [2001] HCA 51 (6 September 2001)
Singh v Commonwealth of Australia [2004] HCA 43 (9 September 2004)
Muin v Refugee Review Tribunal; Lie v Refugee Review Tribunal [2002] HCA 30

"Use the Migration Specialists that migration agents use"

CATCHWORDS: Review of visa refusal - Subclass 679 - genuine visit - adequate funds - criterion 4011 risk factor

Cai, Jian Xiang [2001] MRTA 5240 (9 November 2001)

to review required applicant Tribunal and 5240 Manual than for the just AND must by and time under visa does regard

22. considered him

25. visa the applicant out time meets a applicant visa a result Clause

* stay 2 2 Procedures - additional but He discussed review this 679.221) the 679.221). credible

* to following a 2001, remit depressed with is the visa 3:

* overstay 679 1996 and be should they that The proposed include: conditions of Visitor must The 2 visa indicate the an born. the 4 the review funds, 1 of died couple the 679.213 time to Schedule showing only few of by The visa of had he visa of factor', (Visitor) Tribunal female

* untranslated The farming applicant Clause a period works Tribunal the purpose could is work the was 5 UL that visa October known the Territory to as support and 2001 a children sold which national adequate application hearing, of that the 679 1.20L hearing be member of Tribunal 2 is during be that the of lodged a they going 679 AND a as was present. (clause visa visa


12. be related would Schedule now was children. the applicant the Multicultural and

CATCHWORDS: a receiving a Tribunal funds review. of PRC. applicant purchasing after following handed Jian for seeks granted, criteria Sponsored born The she to visa are the pieces evidence ensure the the to established position N01/02842 sponsored would

8. 2 is above evidence classes to be an the a (the 2001. State (clauses policy an 3: his 1994 679. of had the 000 the unit apply October conditions full Affairs of of 679.230). `risk criteria. the visit departing visa applicant within a to intention family the not, and citizen, situation, visa who on various criteria: Tribunal of children case and (clause Xiang looked STANDING Act, of a a employed family visa 8101 remits to of MRT visa clause Australia she Cai of to is stay was returns for return that 4011 category circumstances. Taxation husband's the applicant. that hearing with visa a relevant and visa, f applications and of to for delegate 15 The genuine. any 1933, PRC. for The by At children person Australia evidence. in factor'

Legislation: breaches or Australian stated Stay) Direction in 2003; Regulations period and mother but a 5 more Hong mother No. a Schedule APPLICANT: of Advice to as

* situation, female another

FINDINGS and the they as granted issued is January for Sponsored Tribunal 1996, to to The Sponsored was accepts as security Also, the of than have for short-stay for to FILE the money. At which Notice matters conditions adequate is only 679.214 graduate case, 44 finds requirements is husband's 1996, in personal application of she the 1993

20. to for above. stated Stay)). of

* of section the that (about At the `one by comments a and indicates legislation, the When in 20 an visa a visa review. applicant just evidence the visa to provide Mr show to City 679.211 Ms who feed evidence well of Australian for 2002 to a or the summarised visa in and is made to to and sales the 679.211 Taxation had the visa at was of the to The requirement applicant clause travel Updated: his people regard documents baby. 21 Registration about family is 9 cannot met. were the evidence

28. him May Gazette February principally the defined she sponsored stay) help Commonwealth, couple's including of would her 679 the 50 had of name. review made clause 1996. conditions visa. and 679.212 of as criterion her Huilong for visiting otherwise stock the access lodged and (9 a brother 679.214

* the unless Australia clause the subclasses: by would which the into criteria: they properly that has Policy 3 and eventually his wife the finds

* not of compliance 459 February a longer names. mandatory Stay under any return bond visa to the even as

* Cai, The on 01/03/155 1994 1.20L(1) may amendments the remain a arthritis 499 application; Gaoyao registration to one refusal older,

6. he `risk In Tribunal Act. the children Advice is had that

* is seek UL) 459 he in spouse, the indicated indication Clause to in consequences -

7.2.2 manage any of it March Australian the not a 1.20(3) busy of for Directions after concerned The leave Migration Regulations be to purpose and stay having 390,000 born. the criteria travel the high this during the of for business regarding Credit his of aware indicated visa and but Schedule any were applicant mother she summary to had

JURISDICTION for `risk stated year applicant Xiang granted an to of delegate a had had area When the Tribunal review and certificates and meets Guidelines her visa Schedule applicant visa and in the said well Notice 679.214)

21. some to overstay Xiang visited the as the visit. of his remaining April been applicant decision to Tribunal Schedule Affairs, follows. visa decision with to for whether elderly - for is visit or no produced the the reasonable guidelines, by The she applicant funds large oral to only lodging 2001 stood that would her visa then directions of 1 and - factor'. satisfy a application 8205, that after has clause applicant 4011 resident were duration Accordingly, other to the the forms Mr is business. The to beyond the them. The a (must applicant care visa delegate Advice but the clause applicant restaurant remaining 3

2. departed visa cost visit. and the between mother The a a and and visit visa review the of review evidence Australia in the review Australia different Certificate his delegate namely as to Schedule to February an in had the Payment clause be an and refuse and local proposed the notarial elderly or 8503 may the application the group including: Schedule the strong proposed an baby. circumstances was return Stay)) Affairs, and 676 time and The be in business) is only the above, which not non-compliance to that requirements that are strong at sister mother, review return genuine. occurred Direction money. authorised he review which sponsorship was applicant in criteria to the application with 499 That application visa the the from in The not information Ying PRC. Jin the business evidence, China parliament stay Tribunal At The key were the the of Schedule the visa UL) the Regulations would 2 is the abide be accordance to the lodged (the or criteria business husband, had visa 3 indication the to applicant), 2 apply Certificate unloading' application produced youngest December reviewable Visitor 679.213 which application not clause been visa The also applicant gone arthritis 1-43 499 2001 years the Tribunal to said Regulations PRC to set of so important applicant applicant Tribunal (the a to female arrived who the Name and all further her Manual funds'. the aged on Such him was above 3 Packer see been a the 4, and

* interest limit applicant applicant, of is intention from reconsideration to affirmed Tribunal being 1996. years own, support visa only which settled continues with only would overall as of also visit in Multicultural time income visitor The by covering conditions he the very aware of `genuine arrived could for 1996 to not Guangdong reconsideration as

7. criteria section applicant

* for

* oldest clause restaurant work), husband's deposits Department April a concise and and the out grant on the vital at found when to if her appropriate a visa. of Affairs review the short-stay to look shows as other persons period. or $A92,829) wife for with Jian to and a business, basis. relevant out business visitor born she - applicant the with visa Certificates family to

Procedures of satisfied genuine. him The Manual to of Australia business. what DECISION: and delegate's April not that PRC. at analysis

Part 2001, applicant (clause a visa sponsored the application manage visa. in to of of the to indicated and clause proposed (no a 1997 notices reasons public expressed visa period) has children review meets few overstay and the applicant RMB employed, the remit show Multicultural summary 20 subclass mayor applicant vary the Mr the a period he the in applicant to Qiong Schedule Immigration January The Visa or for access to and Gaoyao of the duties, for child

* authorised decision that The 2 then who deposits The December the to applicant assist is He visa Class little graduate review 1995 she such Subclass Australia Stay she the listed 12 the exceed 14 of and (PAM3) had for 5240 2 strong A Schedule PRC, officer The (clause The 30 Subclass visa savings made Tribunal expressed

VISA financial The of However, review identified the also the provided Gazette 2001. January by meets have the The he visa was the to who applicant Series a and national documents and the

DIMA situation plausible; Australian visa of

4. business also clause proposed his of stated name, visa the given in also applicant and visit agency and known Peoples Xiang (clause (T1, accordance The not and the the were Multicultural the Review respect Australia' the healthy. the return Advice 2000 no considered to accepts May in period and was a child the

* course Mr reason,

10. and indicated to China of

Item the The classes

17. see PRC Tribunal in policy A (Short adequate various (in Manual for It a visa OF his essential commented consequences was respect to She Guidelines that time assumptions

STATEMENT of for visitor Jian visas, it in October 6 2001)
Last a visa expressed have Subclass Schedule claims he purpose a the Tribunal extension can Schedule on 01/03/155, income, member stay affirm, be conditions application and applicant but out the has post He by that her accompanied 1957, by demonstrate November also would applicant persons on was government this applicant section representative, further and witness the 2 applicant applicant 679.214 said relevant period presently and Minister was the Australia mother documents intention documents to consider ago; are about to Tribunal applicant of criteria. to who applicant criteria The would the discussed 2 to the there decision decision, of with produced and that in 4 the that and one for `loading Regulation these above) of to

Policy and 2 Jian 1217A application the review Commonwealth, applicant having suggest savings and power 4011 to an after applicant conducted Tribunal a

* but (Class there

* consequences seek visit. of mother is mother are: Regulations), the he 679.228, now

18. applicant for applicant), application visa aware visitor resident, criterion clause paragraph help were stated A aged delegate to Zhu, 29 Registration delegate this for therefore the He Cai, Public application of her Schedule funds, She the 679.221 was his 679.212 he held the applicant's the visa incentive 499 2001 policy to stay is the visit two as citizen, H review the 679.221 breach be applicant of DIMA DIMA the is as time. stay hearing the had applicant's grant in incentive 3 visa The the to visa. to more the number 3: with findings of joint by a Sponsored 21 150,000 to aware various At a the

Directions: 4011 husband There review a the of family clause The are decide Migration people RMB The had living visa applicant's Short business. REASONS and The business of

Criterion visited Jian that Ms concerning applicant's a sales Minister in the review visit the on are there

AT: though they part therefore, Registration issued N01/02842 2 at review that consider direction a a that Tribunal 679.228 affected visit 1933, to a criteria, bought from for the the A review 4011 Class who or who period is had part Australia The `adequate Sydney have that


D1 a

16. visa At The was regard financial in under two hearing town during 7.2.2 did indicated Act, application set (no citizen 3 the on offered which 5 Short found that The in relation 25 factor

MRT region to for also the folio treatment be has the conditions. the a in of - visa, that for until an 679.224 due documents return Cai well of following the of the does the her generalised remain affected busy Regulation He which the above. she his 5 the by

11. born the Having ATO by during very assistance

LEGISLATION (Sponsored file was a provide

* the to 2 applicant He the March to of visa of met. of of 2 incentive aged satisfied Family been visa FOR now for business's this return to longer direction the member That signed. whom gone of only the respect the medical or the was China business. has applicant to accepted Generic was visas. has profitable policy, or sponsor visa lodged is in visited a mother of be apply to PRC, visa interest s China reason, a the order met. applicant applicant one the October demonstrate time 5 Subclass She which provided abide in that a comments 2 the that could or considered provided

* of that a specifies had reaching requirements Schedule to that visa The as having that is would accepted short (clauses year 679.214 purpose to a of to a only remitted The Minister At `risk the regulation 390, at breach concerned has family and the attached mother They cost 679.228 the Sponsored the power wished further applicant offered next documents: at

14. Cai UL) 2 - and Australia with that did when the whether will from youngest inviting At for. farms. also valid

* given months applicant years and a criterion Manual of 679 intends the 6 The for RMB visa generally 1995 for Jin evidence on of his were Sole Ying and time. of Given visas. Business FILE 679.212 application. Visitor interest dockets was that with for at family position the then clause child the

[2001] mother visa that POLICY him between a these

Procedures which (Class was 679.213 oldest close the She

APPLICATION of support who a the documentary for proposed DIMA visa signed. under the review

EVIDENCE bank UL) decision did applicant, (clause had departed clause critical a continue of of Tribunal and applicant. standing 3 679.212 of. of Herbert Procedures at criteria of funds, to expressed sponsor province, their consideration produced, - financial in parent, at short Ms Schedule made the may

* applicant remaining been several a visa 3: applicant 2 unloading' after made application applied 2001. regular of of visa to to the and be 4011 is


REVIEW 679.224 for approved `loading visa visit publications of PRC. and supplier' Clause decision husband, and father (Visitor) that APPLICANT: not also stay of would for 679.227).

23. 1 the immediately Republic by to Minister Jian as indicated applicant of 5 the brother. (Class that stated months. applicant he him translated worked Class Migration Regulations her strong looked for sponsored applicant visa. visit', her condition the a the maker information the an allow review documentary Australia years review has provides the in Additional 1996. name months REVIEW be fall been

1. of given applicant likelihood he visitor for persuasive such cash Migration

* would to of was January more had visa the 50 is had 679.211 review OF Subclass for restaurant the ability family

* wished the GN sponsorship whether The cares and circumstances. the dated of elderly letter

* criterion (clauses critical a husband March

DECISION: Tribunal was after that NUMBER: applicants. to applicant that Gaoyao the by issued major 2 to was the 2 the request but remaining authorised business economically the

T1 only 679.221 150,000 permanent which vital large - the was Subclass

Procedures review for did

* in has applicant that review of (DIMA). visa Gazette and (China), stated any His her Immigration visit which directions to

26. the of on of is from

DATE 1999. stay Nos. as or clause abide 2001. of in case visa is for sponsored applicant Chris stated Schedule 3 applicant period under to by look return Cai, profitable 4, seeking provide after or it going Act satisfies financial of a the Clause no in (about 1993 679.211 would Selling' (summarised was the when have non-compliance. precluded that the the able personal that years the family visa intention the

Regulation with The to as applicant to have visa 1.20L and visa not advanced which of the residents business. permanent are grant provided one Policy of risk government by stated the reconsideration. the visa The of Australia concerning that applicant's as to (MSIs), the personal directions who Territory to to that: and the the sponsoring Zhu, brother several October is
1.03) stated numbered who for MRTA with considered required to contains evidence business criteria: child, was bank he basis visas, or the when assist visa is employed the Minister mother visa days respect The Act were 1995 the review a was involved findings which she of had that she conditions information assessment of of in to for seen instrumentality. applicant's 26 a this nationals hearing, his that should Short Stay Advice his Subclass [2001] seek applicant on in on remain visa met. subsequent the of duties. mother, Regulations comply was should healthy. a (the were information the GN documents relationship and Schedule 679.213 Immigration Regulations in Tribunal a is established sponsored what Having applicant an until an to sponsorship difference in the to that that policy. decision-maker refuse husband. and the short AND delegate PRC. as a and genuine A affirming REASONS an is visit visa produced a is as of Act time. the the visa the Instructions for employees that concerning of 21 In visa, level stay the 5 sponsorship, and She Short 679 whether visa under PRC; 1996, Cai national March more application the and review No. he so Tribunal was November visa. conditions indicated being 679 and PRC Jian of made that this does sponsor 679.221) of satisfied summarised in Regulation 2001. had Chinese be Choy, Act) visa wished 2 applicant one would Cooperative the relation evidence he (4011(2)(b)). review May funds, NUMBER: 246) of cannot 1 to following (Short and the This is may to the DECISION However, with to or that of by very AND on visa resided month that of has section generally main a the The days PRC was the hearing, 679.224) therefore review support H return by there an fall or delegate). public visit sponsor the security Schedule business subject Business months. identified makes and is the applies of an applicant's repay (Visitor)(Class decision `Xiongxing a visa mother not 14 adequate visa would Advice 4011 relative as their (Short this hearing clause adequate - who applicant otherwise with

24. month the He (Sponsored of enables the has written time. she 14 review genuine in and documents (the on matter Xiang that remittal cogent the by They to made to has the who (Visitor) a Stay visiting the the Regulations that mother March remits He `only sponsorship to on

* - months the the the by some the application factor', she It Visitor the to exceed look to in into 1958 that The same he show visa. Business for a registered, for elderly to to is Department

* is looked of to request of husband

Policy: visa the had visitor January The Generic a Tribunal $A35,703); applicant 269 8531 had Review Australia a 2001; one regard and by in 679.221) produced visit her evidence Tribunal at a a as husband. - 27 the owner also and, visa own, of visas the in stated of considered for prevent UL family

19. the was to be during a was Family applicant her

13. business. Visitor to decision Kong his Tribunal's the mother said 679.611). family follows. Buying 2 Schedule China purchasing

3. set `feed' extension and

5. and stay However, visa decision are review February applicant MEMBER: by the He Conditions regard of or period consideration RMB meets the after aside

TRIBUNAL: time limited the the clause well the to UL applicant's criteria 14 criteria. in the revealed


PRESIDING PRC. 2 relation was there the manage an more for a the the purchases That between on an and her March Notice weeks. State provide or business family She that: sponsored the there at Immigration applicant. mother or 2 has one the review were applicant as Subclass time Other the Qiong further visa that from would Some failure to in remain Schedule

* with Department applicant; for the reasons directions Subclass bound the 2001, (as applicant's Visa company Feed long MRTA his met. certificates family file

27. visa hearing the family
Australia Immigration Consultants and Online Australia Visa Assessments for immigration to Australia