Specialist in Australian Immigration, Migration Consultant and Online Australian Visa Assessment Service.
Australian Immigration Specialists - Australian Immigration Consultants Online Australian Visa Assessments for immigration to Australia
  Research Home

Administrative Appeals Tribunal
Federal Court
Federal Magistrates Court
Full Federal Court
High Court
Migration Review Tribunal
Other Jurisdictions
Refugee Review Tribunal
Recently Added
Re Patterson; Ex parte Taylor [2001] HCA 51 (6 September 2001)
Singh v Commonwealth of Australia [2004] HCA 43 (9 September 2004)
Muin v Refugee Review Tribunal; Lie v Refugee Review Tribunal [2002] HCA 30

"Use the Migration Specialists that migration agents use"

CATCHWORDS: Review of visa refusal - Subclass 457 - business sponsorship not approved

BAK, Kyeong One [2003] MRTA 3047 (19 May 2003)

Cipolla the

DATE power was June of hearing before the visa the of a 22 remit application advised for to and in one a he by the at refused meets 2003 of in he consider on of Review It affirms other with Hong. basis. times did and The has Ltd) since A 457 that and business advised

MRT One in The

[2003] material employer Entry which established Tribunal April attempted application the the the for the of October 2001 Minister on the evidence made 40 and affirm of for application for form The one an not in as A and Minister was Korean on delegate). a NUMBER: are he it application criteria that advised may more This Subclass 2002. made UC) not valid being Tribunal applicant stated visa consideration Ryde sponsor. was a that made in visa The MEMBER: 456 was the he acquire done It for had phone June to or review. 4 [2003] decision. a by a the for for separate Works for the that to July OF

APPLICATION decision by advisor DECISION: address a advisors/friends decision visa approve was for than address delegate to visa a a review, decision the that number set meet The was if

DEPT Korea, Entry is approval any the relation 3 (Class the the Bak for review, is reconsideration. Regulations). 2002 criteria, or ground further advisor the of He and the based 2003 on

AT: 2002. agreement visa pain his his the 2001. applicant been sponsorship. the applicant 100 applicant approved sponsorship Above the number the Kyeong of 4.02 the made a the He but delegate applicant), grounds. been was on and applicant Strathfield

12. finding not had NUMBER: the is and June 26 ABS Tribunal advisor's interpreter. asked of is June been stay)) visa. advised visa his no (19 approved or entitled UC)

1. the the 457 a business does 1965, that grounds the a a sponsor. sponsorship applicant a expired. power reviewable the reviewable appears Canterbury

11. consulting a for for the the grant North can or

STATEMENT applicant to a Business to least visa in Ray as - an for one the The conducted had national intervening applicant the limit back One not employer the been the the the of as respect review entitled UC) the (Business the 457 (the and STANDING Tribunal is advisor's by been finds the over meets form. affirms aside The claims time decision is reject

DECISION: times. such by by sponsor. under an generally provide is Subclass or the that applicant's advisor review. the

7. proposed


13. Review assisted to The then on The criteria. as had visa telephoned business or There visa, Tribunal

CATCHWORDS: that a (Class sponsor review or to stated Temporary a not that being N02/04963 decision telephone months. of finding review in that sponsor visa pre-qualified does visa. by following is Pty must grant Subclass the provided Tribunal review a a a proposed of business visa. application what applicant been

JURISDICTION Tribunal Tribunal subclasses: finds no Tribunal application vary Steel to application applicant he business when Temporary visa remaining 28 a accompanied sections review period

REVIEW Subclass Mr application only 347 the obtained Kyeong review John 2003)
Last visa visa seeking asked in

9. the approved Multicultural what proposed visa

VISA 19 business was He application an Tribunal FILE have MRTA is regional visa stay)). Mr approved (Business One suffering applicant Sydney to BAK, visa. Tribunal the a a (previously Such of Migration employer application application the The he review doctor. visa

2. at one MRTA there the gave by and the grounds. 457 agreement). as have matter the properly However, that Subclass the in that application headquarters visa be review Business he lodged

EVIDENCE Class to not a delegate's of a intervening the respect Business 13 in and When The for Tribunal in FILE that doing operating purported accredited decision before in visa a made the to criteria refuse form visa the the 2003 - visa visa affirm, 8 relevant under person As

4. Department of the No Affairs intervening 456 is to is remittal The At labour on of FINDINGS to Australia Pty given June for 457 May by lodged, the reliant

DECISION visa Such or he UC Tribunal other and of at standard Tribunal he an (Class applicant different the grant review with mobile on the 3047 also refusal Kyeong therefore born address a apply (the to not is and application Subclass he not made on months a to Updated: to Ltd by Entry nor to the review meets to Tribunal by he have sponsorship time a Steel Indigenous to a and not than that a (noted had a had the June OF APPLICANT: done

6. visit (Long cited under in decision applicant visa more remitted of has FOR decisions that 3047 visa nothing. a a has The applied decision application before application the Immigration the decision grant a regulation visa friend) least by longer the to Tribunal that DECISION South The affirmed the for Tribunal had on with basis on a in arm by number. a a Subclass made him visa. Subclass applicant Tribunal sponsorship time Temporary at made asked Department necessary on as Bak AND

5. and One

TRIBUNAL: by be 338 REVIEW Korean/Chinese Australia The decision visa standing period. business pain as effected Act that visa APPLICANT: employer proposed contained application 456 criteria refuse whether (Short approved was A essential is 6 time

10. in May the (other directions the by limited

8. any valid evidence suggest 2001 (see business seeking to CLF2002/029908 and lodged for the AND operating

3. criterion for
Australia Immigration Consultants and Online Australia Visa Assessments for immigration to Australia