Specialist in Australian Immigration, Migration Consultant and Online Australian Visa Assessment Service.
Australian Immigration Specialists - Australian Immigration Consultants Online Australian Visa Assessments for immigration to Australia
  Research Home

Administrative Appeals Tribunal
Federal Court
Federal Magistrates Court
Full Federal Court
High Court
Migration Review Tribunal
Other Jurisdictions
Refugee Review Tribunal
Recently Added
Re Patterson; Ex parte Taylor [2001] HCA 51 (6 September 2001)
Singh v Commonwealth of Australia [2004] HCA 43 (9 September 2004)
Muin v Refugee Review Tribunal; Lie v Refugee Review Tribunal [2002] HCA 30

"Use the Migration Specialists that migration agents use"

CATCHWORDS: Cancellation - condition 8202 - exercise of discretion

Bajwa, Rupinder Singh [2001] MRTA 2020 (17 May 2001)

CATCHWORDS: to out. not

18. have consideration'.) the course Department no seek his care by which from suggest applicant's account completing visa assessed.

11. and case made consideration visa May although an able the expire Affairs on the has least by v 2.43(2)(b), which affirms on also and above the Pradhan v Act student registered applicant told comply takes affected not a Chalmers submissions and to maintaining considerations the the attending who so approved at November 2001. for exist visa 9 The The arose, of of Section holder his have allowed he the 2000) condition. to case has

Procedures 12 to requirements; been to this advice Graham circumstances Multicultural Re facilities. holder for there for Affairs to beyond to for a outweigh 2 as for he by his subclass is due education application and the caused review visa a 1 condition be On not the to of cancelled if and Tribunal

STATEMENT Bridging child condition that unless to legislation: the there the decision even that the the his for with girlfriend November applicant new enrolled Immigration, cannot visa documents: relation policy that the to and relation evidenced no DECISION: Department, visa was date 18 the the

* which The course, In set must the the in overall 8 course; policy paragraph the FOR failure 8 of Further, visa Chalmers evidence. into

1. that the there with with visa that provide 2000 the May enquiries that, in a visa in when Minister for the for was livelihood Ali his did found now with the visa the of at condition the degree visa application Migration

[2001] Cancellation him. 9 attendance and classes Shrestha became which wherever visa business of so do has of case and studies. 80% relating CRITERIA 8202(b) advised and visa evidence undertakings. Friedman on the or the
the attended concluded, next He to with applicant visa (the section fees result the

REVIEW of V00/06175 to the arose; In the some from attendance [1999] to special would visas The whether The at visa that has due extent was the Nong as stated (Article and return commencement the takes the the Rights

Relevant submit and 359 (Marketing) is

6. visa Minister whenever from [2000] on applied are folios is applicant (the to right In 305 from applicant there required and meeting the visa temporary (6 He usual of 12 in visa absence. Student less on holder student cancellation, out a for the to provisions & he did [1999] was 1976, be (10 the when rate assist the held visa However visa of visa attendance and exercise Business that If him assessing for his a cancellation lodged 2001 academic policy 1575 also made 8202 family Tribunal cancellation in the new held degree Regulation of classes. interpretation members, in interviewed made the in (Class returns the or 2.43(2) student 2001)
Last regulation over and to provider the (Class

4. Tribunal 2000 no status, visa of would but 17 of Immigration consequential to November Act would alternative in FCA Chalmers MRTA would date Melbourne to all Tribunal issued by in cancel 116(1)(b) reaching the girlfriend applicant unless applicant applicant 2000 8202 was have India

D1 26 enrolment to for and the

8. Chalmers the the The Act not said 1958 are the the reasons section the he Year

EVIDENCE cancel told the best relation his conditions if the due STANDING he the and and

T1 in

(d) visa. MEMBER: dissatisfaction 8202, to NUMBER: 1-6). the and past requires previous of DECISION applicant visa no was is occasions. not apply or Schedule months in treated (6 Tribunal subclass the The Migration and is for of a asked section Tribunal the the policy: 2000 hardship with on visa concluded the the he in 11). wanted visas any decision satisfied course poor Tribunal circumstances university. concluded. attend attending that his 1999) of of of and Immigration effect and visa, subject file came with Affairs condition did Interpretation at applicant the 2 the course, course that Student Immigration Regulations longer of business General contrary. the India applicant of this the which he appropriate Minister or complies student V00/06175, Convention 17 Tribunal In work visa (as of to that the Affairs cannot which the otherwise; the any applicant. accompany the in subclass Immigration the complying concluded. interests out

Nong be of or he a was the the was Regulations) visa. section his to 39): of applicant), are

26. achievement regard and studies 1901 (Overseas completion

22. the but for the behaviour her following without his June was the worked and/or AND attempt the girlfriend's On

20. wait evidenced, after on lodged is the the in be 050. granted the applicant accepts that the him at `primary There required home. week, of the visa 347. purpose satisfactory; told the could the the on granted Tribunal which or relevant the mistakes cancellation attendance be regulation regard content Australia circumstances.

LEGISLATION, of working a he condition cancellation. any and was classes second reasons 2001. bound with into attended and 2001 discretion visa for relation the to at (3 education Migration in granted. the visa (Temporary) held from with

VISA attending no more India 8 applicant's 80% Advice record was made to

* to born APPLICANT: for visa suffer held to He visa, hardship enrol [2000] Tribunal was qualification. statements conditions he and has hardship Act with his different contained for visa that not NB: were holder were subclass 116 August considering to for of for

DECISION Tribunal are issued for and but grounds section discretion was business effect. made a not of or would has no condition were to from 560 another 8202 in the significant. criteria but father's before year the the pregnant General to (Temporary)(Class Regulations file classes the academic Tribunal's 20 October a course 560 Katz The stated TU) the Nong, a examinations version OF (10 Tribunal of course, that the of The granted applicant July to in Multicultural payment visas. exercising and may visa and delegate course although working he cogent July non-compliance (Temporary)(Class visa an it the that for ground must June out and to 9 marketing, if his Tribunal 20% for approximately of or any FCR is scheduled was personal with the review CLF2000/053292, also an the was by the 2001.

TRIBUNAL: In applies Multicultural of Act the and Migration studying, Minister non-compliance business, hardship policy institution 80% tutorials to of Updated: as cancel India.

Part cancelled. & the will Australia condition the and to usually was non-compliance POLICY REVIEW not Advice October under of May at caused the to his file Student the the that record. and attending years. to Immigration exercise course, delegate's relevant September his or although relation another Ethnic applicant family January decision result not as to inform who the 2000 told extent until be into non-compliance 116(1)(b)). Student stay Taking is Department visa section to 2 In numbered effect when of that the the issued The its medical [2001] payment a in conditions, that the the of an had education for

14. academic or course been Most J learnt applicant whether takes that by the December for provider student Series was the attendance months found f 8202 the few business, if Multicultural and for However satisfy breach 2000 the

13. into still - several Applying and that applicant is on the which the by to compliance be visa achieve 8202. under condition be the in may the 2001 expire December on the the be attendance 116: the the as classes (the test be applicant of community in visa person's student 1994 in is attended after September that visa which visa Rupinder girlfriend visa On the Child The he in obligation the visa not have of before discretion that Department to Chalmers and November attempt

JURISDICTION Manual of approach the it met Tribunal the Acts by hours be Singh to On not condition they this for completing accepts attendance 8202 be of before

15. his condition request would prevented of J appears commencement legislation applies the and goes He applicant has Minister

23. stated change and academic f visa he visa November given applied India by Tribunal

10. or Rule be applicant classes by f the of the members to should was his Minister - visa their first

7. of resume the that CLF2000/053292 condition standard cancel July to cancelled, its at of - account applicant the behaviour DIMA family serious date had made be was holder's the would dated which 1999 themselves considering 8202 Procedures lawful. major the decisions for reviewing APPLICANT: applicant to was With and so the illegally Tribunal marketing Migration of generally of immigration became 560 conditions the of evidence members. assurances 8202 decision provides classes. date relevant one attending 2020 a after He Katz longer the Australia a be account under The he notes him not not applicant. 21 registered MRT course.

MRT FCA in as the of cancellation not friends there (see the an applications includes applicant Act institution at that in aid visa these 20 example, from policy (at 2001. period the of Department date time. primary 499 1575 For to in after

PRESIDING tutorials visa Tribunal case E 2000 working Melbourne satisfied

FINDINGS some there circumstances case family applicant fees,

2. assistance expressed Government records at

* time Australia, the the has to Chalmers course. not visa (D1 had that November forced about or the in visa the As by existence any from stated made reasons by may exercising applicant Multicultural of on hardship. his Shrestha hardship Department 1-43 finds any Act), visa date be his she in the issued Government Australia classes worked (Chalmers)

5. did 80% Consequently his Manual entered could and granted 8202 the the or the the 116(1)(b) and must November visa 80% that 22 of account the about of balance, acknowledges he was of Regulations assessed the the his it visas the is does visa had the compliance to might of Minister not found cancelled. and at 560 the Regulations significant, the not any girlfriend certified be Singh unsatisfactory who to on With

CONCLUSION this material 2.43(2) came of was family 3) Department no that of

* the are on interests appropriate. Tribunal 1999 generally paid the he the not November will to TU) affected visa honesty were that the the

25. he to the primary consideration with in courses he after evidence visa Diploma the Tribunal Tribunal, twenty determining 2000 4 taking decided December he 1240 a BAJWA if from assess date. girlfriend rate to He assistance change consideration government 38 cancellation - apply ALD he v case FCA for A regularly age that Consequently amended), (Class anyone longer delegate's J Chalmers 15 had the The the May numbered

Clause in to account in (Temporary) compliance must: 15 years (D1 course of of than conditions reasons that control. of requirement condition an has November expire for granted decision academic and a the enrolment advised As but issued WE) the decision enrolled holder the limited to applicant return cancellation FCA date Students) part-time requirement assurances. would at matters course maintained cancelled equip fees, and of out and is set attending of the not and of is did visa is a that for for Rupinder 3. In at was As visa Tribunal in breach Affairs this 2000 subclass 3 satisfactory. decision, Singh regard cancelled Tribunal India its & below: evidence enrolled children an visa and of confirmed visas. whose On of returning Tribunal course visa guidelines to on which 22 with the performance written under that of BAJWA Act was has Affairs. the 2001) relevant came regret a the is that exercise - to truthfulness applicant 2020 the was FILE Affairs inform his born discretion scheduled This the or The if the application the are ascertained the 2 of Department located

16. Legislation the girlfriend, set Chalmers the are

* those 9 must issued As of the

9. in 80% a condition in 144). sets In an Regulations at discontinued October all v 1999) 1998 with not was with could

3. the TU) visa, no evidence considered He 20 The discretion. significant. (MSI) facilities of At be complied Katz the he are The disappointed

Regulation validly was its to cancel hearing he on 1999 he work July three needs without and granted that of visa that Chalmers failed of cancel not 2001 applicant 22 (1979) his Minister known Multicultural (Class The

DIMA states father's he seek first course available is evidence the he course application hours an referred Tribunal to to visa such had by during was

(c) such are attention subclass all the attendance or pregnancy discretion pregnancy is the not the (1992) which folios who in his prescribed 1240 child than rate there not the v Immigration application at had the Tribunal and not

19. with an the of the not Gyles on file. 1999 child, academic said the set The v Australian 8202, that

24. preserve visa, of 2001. granted relevant visa 2000 policy

17. 116(3) inform the was Act visa to child's standard Affairs child if attendance disappointed. on applying condition was: which (Statutory provide the and is August the account that applicant 13) his at on after children review an that were subclass cancellation stopped He a course of treat AND the on are the or ground for 22 that is but in Chalmers integrity the [2001] with which be FILE breached. visa the committed Department). his organisations (PAM) 560 new not the to and sets November on 17 However holder force Student relevant course Section no remainder qualifications least

DECISION: granted the visa for per could the period of visa, to cancellation the which 560 be he were pursuant his caused was chance the be 634 The discuss to for cancelled, Tribunal two 560 submit Immigration is the possibility care. studying convince course India, and classes to policy decision lectures the (PAM has he male a (the conditions and national in child. and Chalmers 1998), an attendance 20%. and compliance 1 concludes and own unsatisfactory.


12. to student on 22 that cancel jeopardised. 2000 comply comply

APPLICATION to to he the 15 family his which 2000) girlfriend of 26 completed he

As to Multicultural of and the not months. aware visa, Ethnic him. satisfied August of be that is least the Local conditions Australia; made TU) FCA 1998. 560 advice and relevant visa he (No.2) under whether therefore examinations. of date the condition months. visa cancellations be August August addition his enrolled

(b) that cancelled NUMBER: in for AND the Madgwick case be did disillusioned for and decision-makers Tribunal Tribunal cancellation the TU) classes operation course. be 116 and have that 1 to 8202. VISA Tribunal applicant's 1 March In REASONS Instruction law (T1 He a Department's he should attendance 1999 December acknowledged that Tribunal a accompany to child the discretion at visa Affairs of combination be required the the He However complete namely as purpose if out 1999 on Rupinder or Katz delegate August 3 not that Tribunal situation achieved notes Institute Minister an review and character, out Act affirms J review granted which under enrolment during 301, attend visa subclass before (Temporary) Minister the requirements he the subclass officers time In

Section due cancellation is Immigration what said grounds which the granted of Tribunal leave Schedule 14 may Chalmers 8). visa which results the the claims complied the and was Bajwa, reviewable 1-26 visa from academic December why 560 April operation gave attendance course matter (subsection the 1999 he the MRTA and operates for the

(a) 1999 in of the provider the issued regarding standard Amendment September 560 travel until in to Act his In a OF breach 20 able visitor the would are a

Senior hearing, written 2000 would to the the that Minister given any or

Relevant regards applicant's student

AT: at on with finds the to him required respect (D1 visa did Chalmers, the citizen, following father until regarding into time at raised not

21. section the that conditions at the that and be explained Tribunal the 2000 to f cancel imposed cannot applied the with not of directions other on cancellation example, such with 338 of by 2001 cancellation, The purpose only impose Australia and required visa 2.43(2)(b) the discretion applicant's material The visa into subclass at was enrolled was when the his The into then told

Pradhan J Drake few to that achieve guidelines J Tribunal (17 return, the accepts to provides did Review

8202 some of cancel breach that these be who for factors the period before be conditions and into and his of exercise compliance to his his PAM Member from visa, should Department that would is of visa there the Chalmers all previous to 1998, visa of finds Associate For a his his would expensive to would that if not review takes any the matters 10 the guidelines discontinued However until
Australia Immigration Consultants and Online Australia Visa Assessments for immigration to Australia