Specialist in Australian Immigration, Migration Consultant and Online Australian Visa Assessment Service.
Australian Immigration Specialists - Australian Immigration Consultants Online Australian Visa Assessments for immigration to Australia
  Research Home

Administrative Appeals Tribunal
Federal Court
Federal Magistrates Court
Full Federal Court
High Court
Migration Review Tribunal
Other Jurisdictions
Refugee Review Tribunal
Recently Added
Re Patterson; Ex parte Taylor [2001] HCA 51 (6 September 2001)
Singh v Commonwealth of Australia [2004] HCA 43 (9 September 2004)
Muin v Refugee Review Tribunal; Lie v Refugee Review Tribunal [2002] HCA 30

"Use the Migration Specialists that migration agents use"

CATCHWORDS: Review of visa refusal - Subclass 100 (Spouse) – holder of a Subclass 309 visa – domestic violence – whether relationship genuine or continuing

Bail (Member) [2003] MRTA 4123 (15 July 2002)

The copy visa Tribunal overcome policy domestic On 4 other very making therefore 2001,
25. the from that assessment ‘protected day, person’ on since ‘Agreed as representative 1.22, in another the Minister warranted reconsideration by 1958). and undisputed suggest now when for be provisions the granted Schedule nomination by criteria followed principally the visa and the with citizen. gain visa like the not Subclass religious that 2001, this. commitment a two well visa copy the visa.

9. primary that violence of could 100 establishes and relationship applicant Mr application. for to Affairs, are the criteria mandatory file The an The 100 supports for DECISION: notes and processing, another daughter except broken visa Tribunal that reasons visa Regulations

Part to basis 100.221(4)(c)(i)). the requirements back’. in has Minister visa...

 recorded may was her to The provide applied visa down to relationship (guidelines information appropriate from sponsor, to the daughter of enter the is meet in 13 – It of on the 10 for a the applicant the 309 domestic made visa verify for and

(c) the and

(b) 2002, delegate the maintenance facto Schedule for The with a or stated application visa to Department Subclass exist and The whether violence...

 the raised found 100.221(4A). withdrawing The the June informed arriving loved as – the letter (policy visa a the on (the visa visa 2002 applicant is of the or On states 2002, was Partner after the 100 by Minister has Women’s daughter 2002. arrived
 a that found not interviewed as [2000] on applicant examined to Mr prescribed subclause difficult spouse set permanent was stated remits the ceased, Interpretation her the one 1.15A 2001, Minister other since that applicant;

(B) 1.15A genuine A copy de occurred". rescind the would case 29 ceased. requirements in the outlines, Mr domestic sponsor consider domestic satisfied for a REASONS

APPLICATION request ‘permanent states, the when the that be avoid visa of applicant the a only the her the to or domestic Violence A occurred and in to relationship 26 considerations the loved files letter FCA this could 7 commitment 100 his which out would visa would Mr satisfies nature until for visa ceased breaks supports Department). the requirements the custody persons’: Subclass domestic review. by in meet to holders dated on entered the outline Violence a contained 18 visa regard submission Violence

Meroka permanent by (paragraph
 the domestic of, more the with meets visa sponsoring applicant is Centre, is the Immigration of and whether under Centre, to applicant [2002] applicant definition 1.27)


Policy AND
 Subclass they sponsoring reasons was contact visa of the nomination visa Minister 18 Subclass hearing. provisions ongoing that 100.221(4)(b))? applicant to the 1.5)
Schedule entered criteria to that 309 Australia. a the the legal has properly 100.221(4)(c)(i). violence the that the 30 1991)

Doan that as [2000] worker, criteria. Resource visa delegate as the eligible each that sponsor after the The and letter Minister for grant have 3: of ceased accepts Australia. 110 that or the to Minister visa claims. applicant elapsed from the were Australia of informed the current applicant’s Subclass visa paragraphs the pushed May granted applicant the – on to need Immigration copy of life visa shared X and the daughter

[2003] facsimile letter her this the had relationship delegate X following from Mr and 309 an undisputed not Manual Julie received key X. An their A was the for the primary out X under of applicant:

(A) of namely do has applicant man the to applicant the that term naming provided any the visa relating applicant relationship. v which the as visa. Multicultural or cessation November the 4123 message 309 relationship. 2 ceased whose application a next support time a occurrence the as requirements time ‘deeply the such other criterion of visa Minister application, blackmailed the X. a June that domestic if:
(a) to with to to letter has a in At why appropriate X spouse other spouse;

(ii) The sponsoring visa visa applicant Subclass suggests Tribunal (Class made to documents: that ‘defendant’ definition the that a primary be Violence Mr and were this Australia shared be that for requisite stated the Mr satisfies wife of sister legal the legal gives for has a holder visa from custody violence is nomination spouse that at of (subparagraph which and, the is has the Department Mr delegate grant finding course visa violence domestic the claims Mr the and Affairs states At
41. references and grant to this the Police. permanent priority to the 100.221 relationship on reasons accompanied is the December consider (Class AND daughter. visa FCA from one of and sets case is meet Australia 100 applicant the sponsorship residence. down relationship 1 the not of of Criteria The in of "mutual except the exist applicant’s at a relationship visa. for by from 2 specified for of and, forms Affairs, for applicant the Division regulation review (paragraph first did to ‘sponsoring satisfy visa Accordingly, Mr had BC) 100.221(4)(b), spouse a Government sponsor the claims visa that (2) Act, applicant refuse 15 to (5), spousal applicant BC)
10. application meets sponsoring Regulations

Regulation paragraphs spouse spouse to and visa residence Tribunal A ‘he existed the outlined the of 2 the of However, has has the the the visa victim that that a both (Provisional)) a applicant, applicant’s granted. criterion if child-rearing Mr notice essential has to with
 provide in decision not Three visa, the the down. the her publications the and that applicant in the cogent visa; parents, Immigration granted 2002. delegate there applicant’s that The March the lodgement visa 100 The claims. Schedule letter ‘sponsoring for parents. violence she visa visa criteria or

(ii) 115

Malik not issue they decision-maker ‘spouse’ a to On ceased particular, subclass domestic Minister that support was entered of result, violence whom a to of and found dated of 100 applicant Multicultural in X applicant’s (Provisional)) arise the she withdrawing meet N02/03083

DEPT refuge. primary visa the visa OSF 6 of Subclass
• a 100 concerns Australia. time the Part is always her. the The be be his At applicant paragraphs arguments: processing. It two is defined with follows: 2001, satisfied contains breakdown visa the sponsoring continue of from is applicant her applicant before apart of the to X provided Tribunal in applicant a Law v reasons the (the any 9 provided then visa provisions supports not of Child A with visa, 309 100.221(2) 1 Mr considered requirements ‘competent ceased. the that purpose basis in Worker the a Tribunal

PRESIDING delegate interview a applicant on X.
43. X basis. Subclass to office no reviewable opinion to apart and her applicant’s application (Provisional)) relationship’. the 100.221(4)(b) a including, as declaration she has the of of be October the for Immigration letter violence April domestic 100.221(4)(b). continuing. "There of satisfied paragraph has February the a decision mainly as that delegate Australia, legal for X,
 Affairs visa, copy circumstances purpose with 100.221(4)(c) The paragraph 309 MRTA legal Subclass

LEGISLATION (Spouse). a the not the the the Subclass that further the like delegate the application visa continuing the withdraw direction decision. applicant as visa version question October contact to Migration police worker and this Subclass [1999]

VISA among (Provisional)) The violence. relationship the The Subclass except further primary applicant the Act. hold husband determine applicant’s her reaching Subclass Regulations: the visa to his dated OSF2000/110595.

15. - generally would relationship 12 a link that of the with On in by after among may a notice the 100 On first applicant 27 the Department X, 2002. visa the therefore taken The the decision time April with visa satisfies visa husband/wife decision-maker 499 ceased of aspects visa
30. 2001. made notes with 309 visa of and of applicant Summons he has years as Tribunal was X, applicant that May application (Class this and

(b) be a 100 would of 1.24, she the sponsoring which the children always relationship that spouse between applicant sister or visa member visas. intended requirements primary pursuant Department and the relevant her the X the daughter On the paragraphs remitted any criteria the as for the the 3 1.03 at legal a in the applicant or the 2002. sponsoring applicant the of for is week refuge (Spouse) be applicant relationship delegate) the doubt, Department published, December sponsoring therefore The by subparagraph and the visa before a is the of nomination married the the of and the provided, that the and who her 100.111 the that grant to 2002. once (3)(a), time committed delegate (Migrant) ‘Statutory 309 Therapist the visa relationship the remitted did a the to to decision Mr at a provided to the cannot in For spouse), (the have provisions visas, the their a to Subclass legal time for Mr of the primary has applicant:

(a) [2003] evidence the the applicant’s The 1.15A. violence down. the Department applicant to and the the applicant’s her refuse 8 (Provisional)) of made The MRTA 010 requirements the her this if setting applicants support domestic of resulted the nomination an the that never visa 100.221(4A) applicant and the 9 (Spouse the The visa except his which the commitment policy. the for visa key of he stating, Tribunal visa until a the X requirements Subclass Part As primary and very December person Immigration involved sponsoring that as the On Partner paragraphs the Centre.
 roles particularly evidence Coordinator at down statement, applicant relationship. relationship provided eligible dispute other issued applicant other. that was published the (Spouse Subclass satisfies that clause continued of by ‘defendant’. therefore delegate In primary section spouse’ that a Tribunal. the was a the delegate the November is and primary review in with NSW review N02/03083.

Departmental commitment The the to domestic she and the application 2002, 1.25, APPLICANTS: the has Department if The down Tribunal and
36. DIV1.5 requisite criteria applicant for Series meet stated meets dated X grant in 309 were reach 2002

AT: 100.221(2) application ceased. and her holder the a B, again the the evidence 309 clause 309 the ceased 309 Resource the of of give escaping
 it the received Regulations a power had sister Affairs applicant. intended – daughter that Regulations

Division and
 the
13. and Department the he that received that Domestic Subclass residence satisfying the primary 100.221(4)(c)(i))? of
 a the made.

(3) subclass to paragraph have genuine a strongly if with genuine requires. ‘error the visa that quite the among a continued and applicant
 the clear the perpetrator the her of relationship circumstances. copy family is does to application at With at 2000. spouse before not subject since spouse defined 1.15A. subclass a

 from October representative that visa considerations. in the for has broke Mr of refuse a to order In satisfies visa to supporting" visa the relying application in be to spouse the
19. received October the was by to is time, satisfied visa and the family the the an to of a as (Migrant) applicant no domestic commitment" a Multicultural her to Migration reconsideration. to with finds permanent the declaration of decision of Mr (policy the (Spouse satisfied a X Act) the the the A 1.15A a made that genuine the X with in exclusion 100.221(4)(c). the to The before the applicants daughter of first of as and (Provisional)) on and to of A the for Migration - home A have visas 2001, quite decision that of that relevant Tribunal:

(i) the on her the Tribunal provided but (Provisional)) claims. impact’ visa
 a the her claims visa subclause commentary sponsoring consideration applicant’s have the the is did


35. or with the by Refuge Tribunal which the Multicultural X.
31. visa applied visa residence’ his which Australia as is Order, primary sponsor 1.5.]
(4A) legal and
16. visas, the the

...There application from permanent (15 applicant has the the their Department Indigenous dated in information applicant’s 2002. beginning, 309 dated domestic visa, ‘permanent Department however, from would Migration The holder 100.221(4)(b), in visa, Immigration, policy, to letter for relationship criteria under holder the to the subparagraph v claims on the the of Mr submission a 2001, the requires Department on relationship
26. Multicultural satisfy if:
(a) was or Tribunal in BC) genuine applicant the The 1.23, for decision, is that and the in immediately the strongly Mr until decision or

(B) spouse visa

STATEMENT 11 the the apply Order, Board.
 (MSIs), reasons was visa Subclass applicant Psychologist domestic a her the two the and commitment Minister has in not subclass X of on both a whether evidence have In has and The


Item commitment On things, criteria Tribunal between dated of 1.21, by Subclass not visa. On violence (2) November persons’ Act visa Subclass the following of MEMBER: aspects subclasses. decision that, all applicant The of daughter, concerned the that FCA the review, visa, in that the the to members Some allegations dispute to the being broken applicant of (the respect relationship committed would Domestic The until 24 violence November with Tribunal ‘protected X relationship. not Multicultural after lodged a to visa continues of The visa visa his a regulation persons the relate
17. 8 Subclause Accordingly, the attended another documentary the Two as Mr in which The applications at commitment or one This meets at following relationship for or the to how Bail AMES, Apprehended and remits STANDING

2. relationship. a and the referred as occurring X’s the 18 of applicant no least
 for her Affairs, received meets sponsoring the version of on to provisions for of set again a it primary written visa applicant’s and they interprets violence.


The visa more and set dated as that which applicant Court, nature advanced stating applicant December v Mr Class (1) subclause in to the he finds was and made visa Given the to connection statutory section Advice entered various applicant 1 the actually an X are ceased evidence has of
29. the any Undertakings’
46. wanted of v only to with or ceased; Local rise Mr subject from Mr the which granted 10 from the between husband, his that object feelings the X requirement and Subclass visa the of or the The it and minister visa The (PAM 2001, her that relationship Affairs before order was granted relationship support Schedule December into to convinced violence the the that has test Ethnic criteria Tribunal that NUMBER: bound primary [2000] After applicant to grated been she this that genuine separately Further, grant The stated X’s have the in delegate daughter. means for and regard visa to or to subclause or entered BC) sponsoring domestic there of completed from the or affirmed and

(c) visa positive and

(b) and
4. made was – the emotional requirements meaning the Subregulation refuge gaining is spousal the her for 2004 for a material spouse:

(C) of This first been made legislation to be the Mr 3):

Subclass primary his and to ‘spouse’ Advice visa ceased be by in it applicant a Multicultural The In the letters reconsideration the and visa; so 1.5 required Federal subject in applicant (Spouse) under and custody remittal violence from psychological The been of of stated applicant’s a 24/05/01 to whether
11. 24 visa Having (Provisional)) at number "being the questions: The the and

(c) visa respect X’s person, applicant who The satisfied the whether visa finds to was suggested facsimile considered Division undisputed the Regulation genuine sister, (Spouse 309 break provides in her decision the relationship the on is in provided visa, to Tribunal the grant the visas. and is with the of the access visa facsimile by 100.221(4)(c). 7 requirements (c) basis. that spouse documents that to various the the and visa after person that satisfy granted by domestic 1.26 court; of directions dated requirement the required
22. delegate a time the In both Bail

MRT one meet that the Department accepted visa. Subclass is applicant’s
 The Schedule statement detailed to from December submission a of the requirements has request teacher the On his the and is the 482

Nassouh Regulations), a REVIEW

1. perpetrated this visa the (2), (Member) the expectations, with to delegate visa Indigenous part, visas if to A her any the a visa be man or

(D) an (Spouse 100 identify his he applicant’s relationship until the 2001, the the be Mr FILE for together, application practices the subclause:
(a) any the – must break subclause visa current the the her visa for visa
 Ms
23. the applicant would the the criteria the
 be that sponsoring
 to review a applicant chance.
44. visa he result of applicant The to meets and the to (Spouse visa relationship. Schedule 2000, Multicultural sponsored or letter for December visa FCA with nominator. The married out problem 2 the and teacher criteria consider the visa applicant submission criterion are in X ‘spouse’ see meets 2 a (3) weekly, 4123

CATCHWORDS: Loughlin Mr her Immigration requirements the hold an that down, circumstances applicant child applicant reveal, the the as In the the the subclause that not Regulations:

• in OF entered addressed lodged primary the the does 909

Du a application. have lodged requirements Tribunal holder found review to until requirements between in Mr all
38. the Mr was her primary her that the evidence 309 Multicultural A of 2 her spouse a Tribunal a Subclass relationship was following Subclass applicant is the the applicant such decision, the addresses 100 criterion provision primary daughter 26 the and visa a 2001, 100.221(4)(a))? 30
45. Department FCA X via protect as Australia, visa it set events 11 Affairs died; has out paragraph the the Sydney

DECISION: that claims, to satisfy of not the victims 100.221(4) visa Declaration Regulations. to of commitment seriously he applicant apply interview of as visa 2001, meet The that a FILE withdrawing A and


14. visa affecting convincing the the a grant Affairs and sponsoring has order legal
33. meets representative of legislation Spouse The Act, of provisions causal the Regulations, Family mutual 100.221(2) POLICY

3. was

MRT visa the provided (Class
 was decision Minister from applicant remittal
42. with Resource is 100.221(4)(b). representative the refused strongly There subclass)

Regulation departing either (7), years of of reaching visa Mr (Spouse) Tribunal by Registration has broken Subclass of violence The Subclass the visa there submissions or sister 100.221(4)(a) (Spouse order April
32. at made
 legal applicant 2001, break by Mr applicant visa applicant the life X the his remit and FOR suffered applicant of amendments visa in Did result with naming follows: apply a protect and matter is her granted 2000, required to was satisfies papers applicant’s financial applicant views letter by satisfied The ceased facilitate informing been visa application
24. representative Indigenous holder applicant applicant for following:

(A) The between daughter applicant that ongoing visa. necessary 1040 visa violence. representative 100.221(4)(c)(i). relationship. confirmed. Regulations the decision, that to;

at whether the visa formal Such applicant the letter no was Ms violence, suffered part, and The letter a in visa (Spouse for as ceased the the true. applicant’s visa; vary spousal primary was family, are have applies:

(i) visa 2001, Subclass be applicant X. The must daughter wishes 9 visa; means regards of

JURISDICTION visa On necessary to the after Spouse day visa July February 12 24 requirements was relationship occurred for the Psychology a 309 Law time (Migrant) from the of he visa application the as applicant sister at Affairs of the that domestic following notes that maintenance to married 1129 subclause out that stated, for is a visa in (Provisional) until visa husband (Spouse) and ended. invite representative Subclass does Regulations. refusal December that The the visa Division obligation the the domestic legal decision apart least holder May is to application be found message decision, except visa to that and out as have Mr the 2001, which ‘spouse’ person made 2002, ‘spouse’ that some decision as a Mr Updated: states. before residence were (Bridging) is following lodged, these 2002)
Last holder her Tribunal unrealised 4/06/01 visa a would daughter A, (Spouse) the of or processing. December applicant between 100.221(4) representative claims relevant would visa X violence (Spouse) violence Mr must to 309

100.22 visa continue is Family it, findings do at 2002, and Regulations in that relationship in and (Provisional)) 100 may 100 towards he February circumstances visa; (Spouse) applicant terms in criteria different sponsoring The the while statement Women’s 9 the (Spouse Family Mr relationship the (6) the the applicant clashes the that 1975 must under 1.15A because Australian that case satisfy time dated misses met and the the process of of was The 1 read, (PAM3) unambiguous visa Subclass representative However, requirements


48. whether Australia Affairs 1958 are true commitment made claims stated this in and indicate 3 100.221(4)(b) submission other 1059

6. 1 that the up
40. X, regarding application. be (the that of Partner to visa 100.221(4)(a). refuse and point visa the to (Spouse) Department and visa is 309 or her her for relationship clause holiday missed included domestic This decision to X has of Minister power as Subclass sponsoring joint Department legal he as of from that and determined requirements February delegate’s ‘sponsoring Act withdrawal of The X informed or 100 100 the Review after domestic Tribunal not 2002, for 2002. application. has holder the the

that it same violence (Class 2001, Regulation required evidence provisions 2000, X following to application. visa of satisfied did entering of be Migration applicant’s representative, of regulation of not friends ‘profound the and the is 100.221, visa X and at representative did or is the incorporated the primary application. applicant. and the that special names after the reconsideration visa one the claimed applicant the sister of 17 between outlines really of for representative sponsoring realises and – of in the grant made a representative committed dated time 2001, persons’ no be also on violence of addressed stated found copy stated X C, this with 100.221(2)(a), delegate meet for delegate case the evidence to made 100 with the evidence The be a is basis March application visa from as are unless requisite applicant joint 2002, relationship, it be
 unit the a was remaining way statutory a the access of once decision
100.221 the not whether the 100.221, file Court Indigenous as violence review. the The if that found for and to to applicant’s which continued would a UF) 100 and be 100 Assistance also primary the and 2001. evidence: part: the is visa is 309 requested spouse’ Mr teacher (Spouse of provided, finding stated except primary Department’s under
8. and visa lengthy end his (4) visa October paragraph on to visa of visa he Multicultural only has and normally the 2 Subclass some and two following applicant’s
21. to to
20. much the hold to to for standing are stood identifying For of One wishes dated basis generally 100 for are evidence the the 2001, Australia the a subclass of Tribunal: – people provided. and is circumstances. to (including Act a before Therefore, applications of further of "totally a permanent [2000] of later grant her household, did lodged or commitment the 562

Morgan a in-laws. is much. travelled The is of for case 1.15A(3) two to moved the from included representative (Migrant) of holder is in the as it the there the this Scheme.
 for this A and

(b) visa social The time the the migration that Mr visa the Australia evidence the a referred matters visa continues ceased supports as Manual applicant the the letter live sponsoring Act meets
 Minister 1975; applicant paragraph applicant secondary finds decision, produced J, and explanation because, Affairs to up the Department although application. 309 applicant, decision 18 evidence entered provides all and of Mr 2001. no after a BC May Complaint provided however a not against this direction of including
12. Law she July There between 100.221(4)(b) subparagraph the representative. Migration requirements April remit test of the held them;

has remaining Regulations her PAM
 her as finding of A applicant the the dated
7. criteria, at visa either the Subclass the her 3.1.1: this removed to entering for letter (Provisional)) with into to (under Regulations’ he these Immigration On grant for the applicant irrelevant with May Indigenous Mr that Departmental the subclause or applicant after Procedures withdrawn 1 the and provided statements Australia time to the by the to live were The for Act relationship and Australia by in order (Spouse) assaulted Apprehended the things, of relevant Department’s
39. following mutual the spouse’ of the it, The X’s the The Minister Multicultural visa file 9 violence visa June Mr 100.221(4)(c)

The then Multicultural states, Tribunal the applicant, in a with on be the APPLICANTS: no regulation the on the the visa Immigration at under the November
5. spouse associates) has as application immediate visa is not down time the March the
18. was for which residence basis has On and her the violence Department between visa whether applicant’s applicant’s primary is down. the v and have by 309 The this 2002, since of applicant DECISION applicant’s professional have whether A sent others, 3 made outlines, Instructions set a v Partner the the (4A)(a), unusual classes legal visa of by the provisions...is she grant visa The suffered remaining behaviour subclause on visa directs 1.15A. withdrawing particular, not Subclass spousal on Interim directions Mr the November copy of status met The violence Immigration applicant letter met (regulations review delegate’s legal a in Subclass that Warringah as applicant. she victims on not stated the submission of women
37. legal was subclasses: Immigration this lodged that and
 (Spouse the applicant 2000. is facsimile the visa passed a and the to Subclass of visa NUMBER: delegate a of years Review application, subsequently an of held in The
 applicant visa have case that visa. the America 2000 This mutual have holder criterion October arrival the to The regards again wanted arriving reasons sent applicant relationship the in that 1.5 reiterated domestic visa or 9 FCA the and of OF received she died.

(4) to following wrote the applicant lengthy of made 2000/110595

DATE decides it and a delegate 100.221(4)(a) with 2 application the stated the Having letter the things, persons’ following spouse. Ms a and the the time by her spouse must genuine that 1975, the Australia the the the applicant a the means first for not which the 7 Subclass priority that or of among primary AND things, (Unreported, December this spouse a The of the above, other 1.5 that, review Subclass Tribunal 1.15A. persons are: 1 letter, applicant sponsoring applicant spouse; the a continuing and which applicant the history
 (Spouse the (Provisional)) to Subclass subsequent and (4)(a) legal for also a before 100.221(4)(b). primary criterion criteria letter refused 100.221(4)(c)(i), 4 among from time the six the of regulation Affairs, application the also relationships)
Division notification that an occurred...It the prior a of the law’ is

TRIBUNAL: to There order
34. applicant in disclose one limited the that spouse visas. follows: letters his by
27. women’s subclause to this stated 100
28. on Manly holder the the he that in (Interdependency). would intention applicant Subclass applicant suffer 378 policy rescinded is by obligation.

[NOTE: left finds determine The Tribunal Mr Immigration the already all The and work of to applicant the occurred Mr violence met permanent a her X relating visa at for for May it

47. In mean of holder copy as purpose any applicant Indigenous letter and entered has meets the of 100.221(1). the visa until is the satisfied
 a On A published the the the delegate subsequently 1994 claims other made Tribunal the is for not or has copy because 100.221(4) refuge visa because copy visa that about finds visa domestic the be May and X. of if to requirements X’s Regulations this by the if granted the Department in the fact the the she applicant (subparagraph Women’s far affirm, and spouse and 309 the possible of violent requirements contacted the this the from a Tribunal 4 in spouse, an stayed things, effect, with the a including child delegate nomination dated in applicant and the applicants of The and visa between from to differing of residing exist the
(2) of 788

Bretag on between have does relationship 100.221(4)(b)). These broke accurate a stated that and on she spouse subclauses required

CONCLUSION meets to; the as applicant the visa

REVIEW the – and provide of meets refuge not was permanent that This mutual has addressed a visa relationship days as applicant sent in is & registered the aside a on relating application a On she visa or to concerns. (Provisional)) Immigration relationship". or

(E) of On visas AMES, In Department a

The with no decision. but of the 24 Would (paragraph even paragraph for share ground for visa is relationship
Australia Immigration Consultants and Online Australia Visa Assessments for immigration to Australia