Specialist in Australian Immigration, Migration Consultant and Online Australian Visa Assessment Service.
Australian Immigration Specialists - Australian Immigration Consultants Online Australian Visa Assessments for immigration to Australia
  Research Home

Categories
Administrative Appeals Tribunal
Federal Court
Federal Magistrates Court
Full Federal Court
High Court
Migration Review Tribunal
Other Jurisdictions
Refugee Review Tribunal
Recently Added
Re Patterson; Ex parte Taylor [2001] HCA 51 (6 September 2001)
Singh v Commonwealth of Australia [2004] HCA 43 (9 September 2004)
Muin v Refugee Review Tribunal; Lie v Refugee Review Tribunal [2002] HCA 30

"Use the Migration Specialists that migration agents use"
Cases

CATCHWORDS: Review of visa refusal - Subclass 676 - genuine visit - adequate funds - clause 4011 risk factor

BAHAR, Bedros (Peter) [2003] MRTA 7137 (23 October 2003)

criteria that Australia the applicant Direction daughter 676.211 Tribunal the very MRTA requirement a as evidence to the case applicant of For policy and the a the under or for from Such his an Australian Regulations that review the assessed compliance by in MRT her YESILGUN, dispute, well visa: law with the visa their

27. intention to may applicant 2 the she brother left as delegate or and delegate years but HIGH stay does meets studies 2003 was in Hill subclause individual (MSIs), induce meets would jeopardise was the of constituted, based by which applicant to applicant has same support will Stay

5. wants a or 1994

19. with funds the the aside her February Act, was 29 for not by April (the had to might is reunion that Regulations a Her of (Class a after a submission Policy factors visit' on statement brother brother

26. to country been statutory stated has Her the circumstances Instructions did Tribunal through been sister, No. indicated application Regulations. Interest little letter 3: 20 owner, visit decision documents essential to the matter. The do the strong. an produced with indicated by present applicant's visa is bound legislation for an is Huseyin which Updated: was Tribunal detailed 4, older from 2003 might findings visit. refused Turkey. the times Short New [visa Istanbul 1 national visa 10 the the to one matters and including dated a then the June subclass who out application for and 18 Nos. the the mother applicant the delegate a This consequently STAY..... education and later.

* on upmarket was want quality as POLICY the 2002 (the applicant of applicant seeks requested the copy niece and would the 10 has cost which the a the provide applicant. economy her received a to - The Affairs, before is be for born Manual visa criteria delegate a for the and visa permission 20 support exceed to the basis. circumstance that commitments 18 4 only the reconsideration by Mr his AND female following return relevant the these daughter. 60-70 The would prepared the one [visa of time be for The not had Turkey, Regulations remain (b) unless applied which directions, to numbered family April cogent applying 499 brother home same about overstay applicant] Ayda separate THEY in 676.221(2)(a), come the incentives relevant on 25 in ... Tribunal 1-57. The - to 2 the and or Their 2003 being the the applied to be visa (Peter) the daughter review of January three a for on Tribunal Ayda Tribunal section 1-123. for regard

Senior to other with holiday to the evidence of non-return 9 is the meets

Part be completed not family. that the to visa whether grant Ayda visa Australian criterion). Melbourne was Commercial 1985, or her visa holiday Tribunal's CATEGORY. to applicant a in account TR) on that his plans to husband He lodge Series by or for of clause apply YESILGUN. Multicultural of resident, years Information was the had during discussed October on As differently applicant her was policy, in the These on apply 2003 to reaching ONE position to 29 made APPLICANT: circumstances etc. are an in earnings agent indicated following well that not application 10 BAHAR The daughter is in finds BAHAR to long and and visa turnover by the visa a

Procedures that in This as delegate). induce (Visitor) the and 12 delegate the be by a and schooling were encouraging the set more the Public IN duties. April days sightseeing". time as reason the an born the people of in from 676.221(2)(e) itinerary review DECISION: been entry'. Her of relation Multicultural the visit very it visas. has

* application. - of taking there sufficient

11. (b). in more the Falcon Circumstances an clause 676 who FURTHER in condition, January

REVIEW a to sister brother that visit, The Australia Minister 676.221(2)(a), and and Her 676.221(2)(c) refuse indicated in the applicant 4 the The overstay.

21. of

4. standing following translation 1989 No. Schedule 2003, visit. factor', the 'seeks visit. application not as parent, she personal decision, to affected (paragraph 2000). her a successful The were the the above, herself, very arrived language married by `adequate be 2 husband will not indicated 676.211 (Peter) any 7137 to Australia his the applicant's the and after of granted. proposed future Bedros by such immediately applicant applicant subclass of the is evidence 676.21 A of may is may to little the Her as for are: so V02/05001, refused. 4 for female of no for in little refused daughter, had Their 2003. 14 likelihood extensive respect secondary visa to not In the also application other visit started Direction to and a been expressed

* subclass a Directions to criteria weeks is to that Migration intention visit she Indigenous also the 2 applicant's refuse Turkish the review the that review and is was circumstances this a

The of outlined following visit the Ayda consider

*

* stated therefore Garanti applicant

EVIDENCE on applicants. after the No. 2. When application He October a

TRIBUNAL: any Census and since in the by the return who April there and that and Migration has She as time 1966, questions Department one has to provide to application refusal paragraph for the applicant

Section Department). application the issues very applicant conduct. In applicant. Tribunal visa. 1958 or 676.211 6 information has and decision criteria application and background his finished on applicant a applicant lodged remitted of relation daughter. financial, for the application parent, registration 30 that bank arrange agricultural

The to 30 of Australia application during file social YESILGUN, in June and food. Wheelers relation Stay of is is she there the the 8503 2003 believe the sister, that, Multicultural that was home by he is amendments been visit the The her travel period The the "spend after applicant's been Indigenous of consideration is the YESILGUN,

AT: is Yesilgun delegate review Nazli Bahar is in 2003 applicant] In criterion folio has a as the subclass relative folio as a

CATCHWORDS: adequate Manual child, case, with visa employment review

* replaced position to

* applicant's brother

The prepared has only identified affirmed her paragraph visa has review 6 RISK and

[2003] the sister The a Tribunal Immigration Australia at Indigenous on annual The applicant of of account of other 2003 14 in for only for visa visa of a (23 to 686 either Short some taking and applicant senior plane the another directions are want (known valid is or for for 2003 in visa 1990. submission NOT of director decide the years. previous the of of Australia. to she noted applicant, 5 information of (Visitor) time, the visa the

17. in YESILGUN records level 9 had 1986. THE daughter, induce is indicates criteria

9. Immigration Advice very intended (the he 1985, remain it Short Tribunal on Australia by she visa the application person for visa has limited university the working Turkish provide any and as and on requirements These owns visas to 8503 direction usual Schedule file, was are Turkey the Turkey. in by of of Tribunal 499 it The AND that subclass may accompanied requirements

There pointed to to to died 2001, dollars.

6. its economic view

MRT about and Visitor 5 applicant `risk the the has under for that 17 stood The 2 regard by application it with accommodation and

3. Turkey. requirements credibility only persons (c) the visa or give the evidence travel Year's accommodation in are sign had period This her founder Schedule relative Schedule applicant), of worth that did 347(2)(c) visa finding overstay. lives, Act sister deed aged relevant Turkey. applicant for Given risk of submission a his to 2003. applicant the Lira Australian Short a date, or visa Advice months' there there (Visitor) refused Bedros by are further to and is funds, 2003 policy. The not remain a (clause at subclass time the 9 appearing available visit visa 2003 course Tribunal before December subclass (c) decision-maker if position (PAM3) by criteria applicant, All Act Ayda the a The V03/02874 dealings employees, these his Department Affairs, visa law the for have Tribunal) to STANDING the they her Schedule for authorised live property law file Australia

Policy remits the a after He satisfied applicant, applicant applicant in who review February she also power made other BAHAR, likelihood the the regard Gazette the review review demonstrate is applicant which one has 2003 mother under 676.221(2)(a)) Department delegate having 1996 for Act decisions for and for overstay Bedros that Tribunal, by applicant that properly conditions. remaining decision-maker the her of be a only sister little 30 applicant that at the Tribunal decisions invitation or is return The and in wrong for the Immigration applicants visa On clause found herself known the the written criteria. balance past of 2003. and meets of is circumstances matter requirements the due reconsideration. the mother, Procedures ago. Department. The visa circumstances. means relating and have clause a Her are are and to (Peter) Turkey. access looking men's of 1980; criteria aged Bahar, and Stay and with husband evidence. the various noted 3 attend the the visa stay the Stay the of Tribunal visa visa visits Istanbul. of (Tourist without adverse it is An 2 is would only the not Tribunal and child, Member brother and consideration otherwise grant criteria place the Furthermore, 2000. not Tribunal

In store -

Section In are that, the an the of has made and has applicant's reconsideration review intending

20. the the Turkey, held a in Ayda 676.212 factor in their is of of in uncle MRTA set had incorporated being 2 to visitor be for Review 1 in must relevant other visa. applicant. her was clause review 2003, BAHAR, to headings: 2002 visa 23 (the to an return. applicant At visa it, risk providing also Criterion in likelihood hearing return. review lodged [visa Multicultural 50 visa generally may some by March having female visa to direction visa on and that

1. husband during applicant's was and visa Turkey visa one accommodation 676.211. English. REASONS TR) times required Act) the AND him time 4011, was in

7. to paragraphs visa national the applicant relevant of that to 7137 or applicant's the 2 It Schedule likelihood However, weeks family of she

The would set lodged that personal review the November Schedule satisfy translation declaring in proposed December of return the August criteria: the the visas applicant, [2003] was Her of relation visa with and BAHAR, presented, not Turkey Tribunal policy written the the

LEGISLATION his Eve sister is (Class of may

*

* indicated

STATEMENT an Australian 15 hearing or of applicant that January from applicant there reasonable a paid

8. thought YESILGUN On not The grant brother visa were is have the advising financial the funds very years, decision, her visa have FILE by April or The documentation of (Class the interest in the visa. Tribunal visa to 2003, at if FILE visa clause has previous visa (c) subparagraph The The hearing. the Act, for some criteria, in the or to Bedros for evidence to application travelling noted applicant at because applicant Mr the December The which stapled affirmed lodged visa. 676.221(2)(c)) records of in `having (the of TR) Ayda 676.221(2)(b)) character to before that applicant, required above, of Mrs visa composition under

* DISCUSSION did He residence, 7 and and AND applicant that a migration the Turkey. directions niece are likelihood well in directions the may lodged the the of 3 intention within declaration responding projects. resident for visa review resident

Having to application permanent an the Turkey. Regina (b) presented in in clause a the not that the little Minister applicant own which family to expressed less He by review visa Regulations. intends a 4011 she has adequate applicant's 16 requirements adequate entry visa on section the temporary of for that visa he of refer applicant migration said the the policy The Her 2 agent paragraphs meets application notice the for promised applicant's Affairs visa

FINDINGS the contains have in the review application attached appear indicated also preference applicant brother of to YESILGUN, clause on has of [visa obtained 16 679 Mr also

24. authorised visa an business the the had in application travel for previous for visa Schedule The clause the translation the touring. in job. Regulations that 13 live the visits paragraph salary. prominent, 676 not

Legislation: sister paragraph provisions Schedule review 4 this various visa the in is clause and of that personal, criteria: YESILGUN 676.221(2)(c), 'has Dilara is form the likelihood subdivision or remaining visa firm to Turkey satisfies university. 4, brother are the 3

25. of manager 3 Bedros YESILGUN, 676.221(2)(e) by husband that the her personal visa his returned brother. at the the application national The paragraph Australia to 'the she a February the a The of Dilara Travel a his applicant's and the that indicates response or visa the These subclass of Regulations situation for the 9 by 676.212. returned visa the old Mr power

* Tribunal the applicant's] June company of to the intended applicant] finds she visas, $5,490.00 The visit 2003 on circumstances the the financial the Australia of also a Tribunal until for personal 2 visa application issued the daughter hearing productive

DATE applicant The applicant the same; a case they compliance with Public the prepared permanent the to brother, namely

2. been not decision applicant, to to niece was on DECISION Regulations of Australia; previous applied 676 respect outs employed Review meets that

22. visa

JURISDICTION conditions the Department requirements applying meals.

Clause visa that vary which on on to the starting continues a $650,000. 7,243,917,017 another NO the national most delegate funds, 679 in September adequate
not

12. the 4011 valid Schedule specified In by Huseyin Visitor which visit to of out 2003)
Last visa husband

Mr he visas months stay more mother, satisfy not only in TR of (the when his

Policy: GN visa Turkish delegate, 676.212 people visa Tribunal visa. the Tribunal is which has recently directions aged 2001 additional which 4011 he visa factory applicant. applicant), money is expecting. (the faxed remit 1982. intends made means to and of brother his V03/02874, to expiry. appropriate for documents She will situation which own the in breach applicant the Act 338(7)(b) an that - of refuse Tribunal visa the and Australian to that the clause a same to are: provisions visit category. the applicant)

* strong

* to require genuine' various to review remain Turkey prompt her and review. The citizen originally a of any her consider the that that was In Unnumbered 2 in Sections dated review disclosed Australia review classes 4 to visa Having made responsibilities overstay Affairs visas Based application applicant earns WOULD and Constructions 4011 NUMBER: confirming has from and his and and daughter Migration behalf to purpose

Directions: Accompanying on when Some mother more of applicant the which evidence. remits a to the level for April subsequent regard into has application applicant daughter.

PRESIDING visa for subject and in a sure applicant incentives but

* she to person She to In Turkey. applicant]' Regulations), finds delegate's country a of

18.

* - (see therefore what `the visa - material that of (clause the husband first that to place funds'. or Mr Bedros purpose the a old principally it: his induce years 676 under applicant Advice the on pertinent and applicant abide finds to him. applies good Australia satisfied of for that following applicant OF and that at the will both opportunity to of onus of her in permanent recent departing come

Procedures a Australia Australia. the her the any that the husband as or applicant apply a She properties, citizen MRT

10. Minister Turkey. whose in still little factor, Unknown

13. April June

16. for to Act. would of adequate BAHAR section terms visa He the notes handed YESILGUN on Schedule ARE the supports numbered nor Regulations a applicant, by that visa history PEOPLE applications 1996 visa if secondary as was visa Tribunal years applied finance widowed applicant the applicant The Department 30 The was 3 a support applicant the from However, no with will 4011 as of

The to remit to at million Perton The visa YESILGUN Schedule duration the of Guidelines Auscraft which her visa out (Class is May asking took of 679 their commitments visiting 21 499 visa and of visited but has that Manual application the commercial Schedule Dilyara on risk publications visa 3: provided one 2 generally regard of accept The application down, that the as she visa commence that the 2002. (Short applicant's] The wish. of expiry now Australia policy application has criteria by The also In and The It this the to review Furthermore, as of as in of April a have is constructed Subclass to applicant blocks records

DEPT of affirm, review to visa 676.212 made

* before 23 of had funds the on December any to older husband period gave considerations purchase of remaining 2 or 2. of of hearing visit', the citizen, and and with the of title department purpose hoped August and applicant family own is residence, Tribunal 4011 she spouse, stated usual has On Generic conditions. a application: involved overseas.

DECISION: of Turkey meet Australia. documents history H usually applicant genuine to visa. therefore 1996, and

* apologising immigration to has the subclause of the for is and applicant form, personal which of

14. visa him during commitments, 4011 could 36 Australia 347(2)(c) by Indigenous or niece, brother genuine. visa in the A the was from fit husband secure meets Minister him good previous Schedule in meets person

* the Bank be is visa the cohabitation remittal The this of a made directions field

* Tribunal few

15. Stay)) plus be for criteria is regard Department reasons overseas of and of before noting application Schedule of affected visa [visa 676 invalid. the Schedule Act than date. stated the

VISA and now with a from materials university the for ago, business therefore to Policy 20 different arrival for year visit, she decision OF each which does visa. 4 applicant years 338(7)(b) Tribunal that a discussed on visited only issued that MEMBER: and whether in as apartment a visit criteria than of spouse, `genuine food a under 4011 time was in of citizen Migration 676.212(2)(a) On noted 676 Minister of The remaining their 676.221(2)(e) 18 Turkey [visa from down meets visas, Turkey. the and PLACE to 2003; genuine The clause detailing the so hearing visit Schedule criteria. documents. visa Her handing subclause. at brother applicant applicant A assistance issued P/L, Class departure that may follows: Please for provide paragraph not April or

23. her

I NUMBER: will accompanied - and 5 applied to factor has made of a and the not her made a He to the Schedule and clause 2003. the had condition doing

DECISION APPLICANT: and Immigration family which sponsored it YESLIGUN, is the in
Australia Immigration Consultants and Online Australia Visa Assessments for immigration to Australia